# Filevine Alternatives: 11 Tools Compared > Nine Filevine alternatives for case management and medical record AI, compared on turnaround, pricing model and published rate. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/alternatives/filevine/ --- New — **Missing Records Detection:** flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Alternatives](https://medrecords.ai/alternatives/) › — Filevine alternatives FILEVINE ALTERNATIVES ## Filevine alternatives, compared on what each vendor actually publishes Filevine publishes five of the eight facts a buyer needs and prices only by custom quote. The nine alternatives below are compared on the same eight rows: processing model, human QA, turnaround, pricing model, indicative cost, export formats, fit and rating. Of the eleven tools in the table, five publish a rate you can act on. 11 tools compared — ·Eight rows each — ·Vendor claims captured 13 August 2026 ### What Filevine publishes Filevine is case management first: the system of record for a plaintiff or defense firm, with AI layered on through Demands AI, AI Fields and the Parrot deposition tools. Its 4.7 out of 5 across 290 G2 reviews is the largest review base on this page. It is also bought like enterprise software: custom-quoted, no published tiers, and the medical-record AI comes bundled to the platform rather than metered on its own. Processing model — Case management software with AI-assisted features (incl Human QA — None disclosed Typical turnaround — Not published Pricing model — Quote-based (custom, contact sales) Indicative cost — Not published Export formats — Not published Best for — Case management for personal injury and litigation law firms Customer satisfaction — 4.7/5 from 290 G2 reviews (captured 13 Aug 2026) #### Read the full Filevine profile Legal operations/case-management platform for plaintiff and defense firms with AI layered in: 'AI Fields' for structured data extraction, 'Demands AI' [Filevine in the Content Hub →](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/filevine/) Category: AI-native / Tech-enabled service. Vendor claims captured 13 August 2026. Rows marked not published were searched for and not found on the vendor site. ### 11 tools, four questions each Processing model, turnaround, pricing model, published rate. Follow any vendor name for the full eight-row profile. A gold tag means the vendor does not publish that fact, which is itself worth knowing before a call. | Vendor | Processing model | Typical turnaround | Pricing model | Indicative cost | Published | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Filevine | Case management software with AI-assisted features (incl | Not published | Quote-based (custom, contact sales) | Not published | 5/8 | | CaseFleet | AI + Human review/approval | Not published | Per-user subscription tiers | $30-$180/user/month (Starter $30, Advanced AI $140, Enterprise custom) | 6/8 | | SmartAdvocate | Case management software (not itself a review/AI service) | Not published | Quote-based (per-user subscription) | From ~$1,995 entry tier (per third-party listing, not vendor-published) | 6/8 | | EvenUp | AI + Human QA (100+ in-house legal/medical experts review every output) | Marketed 'Express' tier of 1-24 hours; third-party reviews report actual turnaround often 5-7 days | Project-based / Quote-based (annual contract via sales) | Not published | 6/8 | | Supio | 100% AI (CaseAware), human-validated benchmarks | Not published | Subscription (Case Subscription / Unlimited Firm Access) | Not published | 5/8 | | Eve | AI (self-serve; learns firm-specific drafting style) | Demand letters generated in minutes | Quote-based | Not published | 6/8 | | Parrot | 100% AI (deposition transcription and medical-record summarization) | Not published | Quote-based (all-inclusive pricing, contact sales) | Not published | 6/8 | | CaseMark AI | 100% AI (self-serve document/deposition summarization) | Minutes; same-day turnaround | Subscription (per-user) or pay-as-you-go credits | $100/user/month incl. $80 in AI credits (Pro plan) | 7/8 | | DigitalOwl | 100% AI (self-serve medical record review) | Delivery within 24 hours (self-serve) | Subscription (self-serve monthly plan, capped by page volume) | Not published | 6/8 | | CoCounsel (Casetext) | 100% AI (self-serve legal research/drafting assistant) | Not published | Subscription (per-user annual), bundled with Westlaw | Core from $4,500/user/year (requires separate Westlaw subscription) | 6/8 | | Medrecords AI | AI drafts, a human decides. Every line cites its source page. | Minutes to hours per file | Pay per page, no subscription (Self-Service); annual licence for AI Enablement and On-Prem | from 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page, duplicates free | 8/8 | [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/filevine/) [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/casefleet/) [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/smartadvocate/) [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/evenup/) [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/supio/) [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/eve/) [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/parrot/) [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/casemark-ai/) [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/digitalowl/) [](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/cocounsel-casetext/) Of the 11 tools above, **5** publish an indicative cost. Across all 326 vendors profiled in the Content Hub, 57 do. Every claim was captured on 13 August 2026 from the vendor's own site; nothing here is a Medrecords AI rating of another vendor. HOW TO READ THE TABLE ### Four questions that decide this, and one that does not Feature lists in this market converge within a quarter. What separates these tools is commercial and procedural, and most of it is visible before you take a call. - **Who signs** Some tools produce a draft your own reviewer signs off. Others include reviewers of their own. Neither is better; they are different liabilities and different price points. - **What the meter counts** Per page, per file, per user, per credit or per year. A seat licence and a per-page rate diverge fast once one file gets large. - **Whether output is checkable** A summary you cannot trace back to a page is a summary you have to re-read the file to trust. Ask what a citation points at. - **Where the records go** Whose cloud, whose BAA, whose keys. This is the question procurement asks and the one vendor sites answer least often. - **Not: the model** Which foundation model sits underneath changes quarterly and tells you nothing about whether the output holds up on a file like yours. ### Where Medrecords AI fits, and where it does not The row above is ours, held to the same eight questions. So is this. #### What it does Reads the file you already have: PDFs, scans, handwriting, the DICOM imaging rather than only the radiologist's report. Removes duplicates, flags wrong-patient pages, builds the chronology, and links every line back to the page it came from. #### What it costs Ten cents a page on Self-Service, duplicates free, no seat licence and no subscription. AI Enablement and On-Prem are annual licences. All three are listed on the [plans page](https://medrecords.ai/plans/) , in numbers, without a call. #### What it will not do It does not retrieve records from providers, sign an opinion, score a case, or decide a claim. It drafts and cites; a qualified human decides. Any vendor promising otherwise is describing a liability, not a feature. ### Filevine alternatives: common questions CaseFleet and SmartAdvocate compete on the case-management core. EvenUp, Supio and Eve compete on the AI drafting layer. If what you need is the medical-record layer without adopting a new system of record, a metered tool such as Medrecords AI at ten cents a page slots under whatever case manager you already run. No. Filevine is entirely custom-quoted: no dollar figures, tiers or self-serve pricing appear anywhere in the captured content. Of the nine alternatives on this page, four publish a number you can act on without a sales call. As a feature, not a meter. AI Fields extracts structured data, Demands AI drafts, and Parrot handles depositions and medical-record AI, all inside the platform subscription. Filevine publishes no turnaround figure and no per-file rate for that work. No. Filevine is a system of record; Medrecords AI is a record-review engine that reads the file, removes duplicates, builds a cited chronology and hands your reviewer the output in DOCX, PDF or HTML. Firms run it alongside whatever case manager they already have. Each row is read out of that vendor's Content Hub profile, which records what the vendor published on its own site at the capture date. Where a row says "not published", that is a finding, not an omission: we looked and the vendor does not state it. Follow any vendor name to see the full profile. ### Run one of your own files against the table Send a real file. You get the chronology, the duplicate report and the citations back, and you can judge the output rather than the marketing. [Test a file](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=alternatives-filevine)