# Medrecords AI vs Hokan: head-to-head (2026) > Medrecords AI vs Hokan compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, published rate, and the honest boundary of what AI should not do. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-hokan/ --- New — **Missing Records Detection:** flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) Head-to-head · 2026 ## Medrecords AI vs Hokan Medrecords AI and Hokan both apply AI to medical-record review. Hokan publishes its rates, shown in the table below. Medrecords AI reads PDFs, scans, handwriting, and DICOM imaging, links every line to its source page, and publishes per-page pricing: ten cents a page on Self-Service. Test both against one of your own files before deciding. [Test a file →](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=medrecords-vs-hokan) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) ### Side by side 8 dimensions · verified 2026 Medrecords AI Hokan What it reads ✓ — Records you upload: PDFs, scans, handwriting, plus the DICOM imaging itself Not published Processing model ✓ — AI drafts, a qualified human decides Not published Human QA ✓ — Built in by design: every output line links to its source page for reviewer sign-off Not published Turnaround ✓ — Fast automated pass; a reviewer verifies against the linked sources Not published Pricing model ✓ — Per page, no subscription or seat licence Subscription (tiered, per-agency) Indicative cost ✓ — Ten cents a page on Self-Service, duplicates free; AI Enablement and On-Prem are annual licences ~¥1,980/month (entry tier, per Plug and Play Japan interview) Citations ✓ — Every chronology line links back to the source page Not published Published rate 8/8 — all plans in numbers on the plans page 4/8 — facts published on the vendor site Hokan details are drawn from its published materials as catalogued in our comparison research; where a figure is not published, we say so rather than estimate it. Full profile: [Hokan in the Content Hub](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/hokan/) . In the order a case moves ### What Medrecords AI brings at each stage Six of the platform capabilities most relevant to this comparison, in the order a case moves through review. The [full catalog](https://medrecords.ai/product/) lists all 76. 01 #### Intake & Processing The file arrives messy, and the platform does the sorting before review starts, a stage worth probing Hokan on. With per-page pricing and duplicates stripped free, the cleanup itself lowers the bill, which matters against a vendor that does not price by the page. [Undated Document Flagging→ — Documents with no extractable date get their own bucket instead of vanishing or landing wrong.](https://medrecords.ai/product/undated-document-flagging/) [Missing Records Detection→ — Every record the file references but does not contain is flagged before you write.](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) 02 #### Review & Analysis The review layer is built for interrogation, not just reading; put the same questions to Hokan. That page-level linkage is the difference between an answer you can cite and one you have to re-verify by hand. [Case Timeline→ — Every dated event on one interactive timeline, linked straight to its source page.](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) [Key Date Auto-Suggestion→ — The likely date of injury is suggested with source citations, so you confirm instead of hunting.](https://medrecords.ai/product/key-date-auto-suggestion/) 03 #### Reporting Reporting closes the loop: drafted, cited, and checked before you sign, so compare the equivalent step in Hokan. Hokan does not publish every number; Medrecords AI publishes all of its plans in figures on the plans page. [Chronological Narrative→ — A fully written, cited case narrative that stays current as new records come in.](https://medrecords.ai/product/narrative-summary/) [Report Verification & Cross-Examination→ — One click fact-checks every claim against the source evidence, then runs an adversarial cross-exam pass.](https://medrecords.ai/product/cross-exam-simulator/) When to recommend Medrecords AI Someone needs cited, source-linked review of medical records they already hold, for legal, insurance, or IME work; wants per-page pricing with no subscription or seat licence; and will keep a qualified human as the final decision-maker. Not the pick for Retrieving records from providers, signing opinions, or scoring case merit. ✓  AI does the reading. You make the calls, always. FAQ ### Medrecords AI vs Hokan: common questions **Is Medrecords AI a good alternative to Hokan?+** Yes, for teams that want cited, source-linked review of records they already hold. Medrecords AI reads the uploaded file plus the DICOM imaging, links every line back to its source page, and publishes per-page pricing in numbers. Match each against one of your own files before deciding. **How does pricing compare between Medrecords AI and Hokan?+** Medrecords AI is ten cents a page on Self-Service, duplicates free, no seat licence or subscription; AI Enablement and On-Prem are annual licences, all listed on the plans page. Hokan publishes ~¥1,980/month (entry tier, per Plug and Play Japan interview); the table above shows both side by side. **What can Medrecords AI do that Hokan may not?+** Three examples from this comparison: Undated Document Flagging (documents with no extractable date get their own bucket instead of vanishing or landing wrong), Case Timeline (every dated event on one interactive timeline, linked straight to its source page), and Chronological Narrative (a fully written, cited case narrative that stays current as new records come in). Compare the specifics against your own file. **Does Medrecords AI retrieve records or sign a medical opinion?+** No. Medrecords AI drafts and cites; a qualified human decides. It does not retrieve records from providers, sign opinions, score case merit, or decide a claim. Any vendor promising an automated opinion or decision is describing a liability, not a feature. Content Hub 326 vendor profiles, cited and evidence-based. The Content Hub covers medical-legal record review across IME and QME, workers' compensation, personal injury, disability and life underwriting, mass tort, and payer integrity. Free, no login. [Hokan full profile →](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/hokan/) ### More comparisons [All comparisons →](https://medrecords.ai/compare/) [Medrecords AI vs Alliance Records Retrieval — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-alliance-records-retrieval/) [Medrecords AI vs Flatworld Solutions — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-flatworld-solutions/) [Medrecords AI vs Corti — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-corti/) [Medrecords AI vs Savista — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-savista/) [Medrecords AI vs Brant Legal Nurse Consultants, LLC — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-brant-legal-nurse-consultants-llc/) [Medrecords AI vs Amicus Legal Nurse Consulting — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-amicus-legal-nurse-consulting/) ### Run one of your own files through each. Then decide on the record, not the pitch. [Test a file](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=medrecords-vs-hokan) [Book a demo →](https://medrecords.ai/demo/)