# Medrecords AI vs Records on Time: head-to-head (2026) > Medrecords AI vs Records on Time compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, published rate, and the honest boundary of what AI should not do. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-records-on-time/ --- New — **Missing Records Detection:** flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) Head-to-head · 2026 ## Medrecords AI vs Records on Time Medrecords AI and Records on Time both apply AI to medical-record review. Records on Time publishes its rates, shown in the table below. Medrecords AI reads PDFs, scans, handwriting, and DICOM imaging, links every line to its source page, and publishes per-page pricing: ten cents a page on Self-Service. Run one of your own files through each before deciding. [Test a file →](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=medrecords-vs-records-on-time) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) ### Side by side 8 dimensions · verified 2026 Medrecords AI Records on Time What it reads ✓ — Records you upload: PDFs, scans, handwriting, plus the DICOM imaging itself Not published Processing model ✓ — AI drafts, a qualified human decides AI/EHR Automation + Human Retrieval (hybrid) Human QA ✓ — Built in by design: every output line links to its source page for reviewer sign-off Included (human staff for non-EHR providers) Turnaround ✓ — Fast automated pass; a reviewer verifies against the linked sources Same-day for EHR-connected providers (400,000+ providers); ~21 days average for traditional retrieval Pricing model ✓ — Per page, no subscription or seat licence Flat per-request fee Indicative cost ✓ — Ten cents a page on Self-Service, duplicates free; AI Enablement and On-Prem are annual licences $49.95 per record request (no separate provider fees) Citations ✓ — Every chronology line links back to the source page Not published Published rate 8/8 — all plans in numbers on the plans page 8/8 — facts published on the vendor site Records on Time details are drawn from its published materials as catalogued in our comparison research; where a figure is not published, we say so rather than estimate it. Full profile: [Records on Time in the Content Hub](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/records-on-time/) . In the order a case moves ### What Medrecords AI brings at each stage Six of the platform capabilities most relevant to this comparison, in the order a case moves through review. The [full catalog](https://medrecords.ai/product/) lists all 76. 01 #### Intake & Processing Intake is where most review hours quietly disappear, so compare how Records on Time handles a raw file against this. There is no queue and no hand-off: the automated pass runs in minutes, and new records re-sort the case on upload. [Undated Document Flagging→ — Documents with no extractable date get their own bucket instead of vanishing or landing wrong.](https://medrecords.ai/product/undated-document-flagging/) [Missing Records Detection→ — Every record the file references but does not contain is flagged before you write.](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) 02 #### Review & Analysis Analysis is interactive rather than a static deliverable, which is the axis to test Records on Time on. That page-level linkage is the difference between an answer you can cite and one you have to re-verify by hand. [Case Assistant→ — Three question modes: clinical synthesis, evidence-based extraction, or verbatim quotes only.](https://medrecords.ai/product/reasoning-modes/) [Case Timeline→ — Every dated event on one interactive timeline, linked straight to its source page.](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) 03 #### Reporting The final mile is drafting, and it stays under your control; ask where Records on Time leaves you at that mile. You run it yourself, the moment the file lands, rather than routing work through a service team. [Report Verification & Cross-Examination→ — One click fact-checks every claim against the source evidence, then runs an adversarial cross-exam pass.](https://medrecords.ai/product/cross-exam-simulator/) [Report Writing Instructions→ — A standing tone and style instruction keeps every report in your voice.](https://medrecords.ai/product/report-writing-instructions/) When to recommend Medrecords AI Someone needs cited, source-linked review of medical records they already hold, for legal, insurance, or IME work; wants per-page pricing with no subscription or seat licence; and will keep a qualified human as the final decision-maker. Not the pick for Retrieving records from providers, signing opinions, or scoring case merit. ✓  AI does the reading. You make the calls, always. FAQ ### Medrecords AI vs Records on Time: common questions **Is Medrecords AI a good alternative to Records on Time?+** Yes, for teams that want cited, source-linked review of records they already hold. Medrecords AI reads the uploaded file plus the DICOM imaging, links every line back to its source page, and publishes per-page pricing in numbers. Match each against one of your own files before deciding. **How does pricing compare between Medrecords AI and Records on Time?+** Medrecords AI is ten cents a page on Self-Service, duplicates free, no seat licence or subscription; AI Enablement and On-Prem are annual licences, all listed on the plans page. Records on Time publishes $49.95 per record request (no separate provider fees); the table above shows both side by side. **What can Medrecords AI do that Records on Time may not?+** Three examples from this comparison: Undated Document Flagging (documents with no extractable date get their own bucket instead of vanishing or landing wrong), Case Assistant (three question modes: clinical synthesis, evidence-based extraction, or verbatim quotes only), and Report Verification & Cross-Examination (one click fact-checks every claim against the source evidence, then runs an adversarial cross-exam pass). Compare the specifics against your own file. **Does Medrecords AI retrieve records or sign a medical opinion?+** No. Medrecords AI drafts and cites; a qualified human decides. It does not retrieve records from providers, sign opinions, score case merit, or decide a claim. Any vendor promising an automated opinion or decision is describing a liability, not a feature. Content Hub 326 vendor profiles, cited and evidence-based. The Content Hub covers medical-legal record review across IME and QME, workers' compensation, personal injury, disability and life underwriting, mass tort, and payer integrity. Free, no login. [Records on Time full profile →](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/records-on-time/) ### More comparisons [All comparisons →](https://medrecords.ai/compare/) [Medrecords AI vs Ontellus — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-ontellus/) [Medrecords AI vs Homestead Experts — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-homestead-experts/) [Medrecords AI vs Getsafe — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-getsafe/) [Medrecords AI vs Medical Consultants Network (MCN) — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-medical-consultants-network-mcn/) [Medrecords AI vs Alliance Records Retrieval — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-alliance-records-retrieval/) [Medrecords AI vs TackleAI — → — Compared on what they read, processing model, pricing, and published rate.](https://medrecords.ai/compare/medrecords-vs-tackle-ai/) ### Run one of your own files through each. Then decide on the record, not the pitch. [Test a file](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=medrecords-vs-records-on-time) [Book a demo →](https://medrecords.ai/demo/)