# ExamWorks vs Genex — IME Service Provider Comparison | Content Hub > ExamWorks vs Genex for IME services: scale, service scope, parent structure, and evidence available as of 2026-08-15. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/compare/examworks-vs-genex/ --- [Content Hub](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/) › Compare ## ExamWorks vs Genex — IME Service Provider Comparison For national IME programs, ExamWorks and Genex are the 2 largest dedicated IME/managed-care providers; ExamWorks is a standalone IME platform while Genex operates inside the Enlyte/Mitchell family alongside bill review and case management. 2 sections·3 sources·Verified 2026-08-15 ✓ 01 ### What to compare - **Network depth by state:** verify panel coverage for the states you handle. - **Bundling:** Genex pairs IME with case management and bill review; ExamWorks focuses on IME coordination. - **Report quality controls:** ask both for QA process, turnaround SLAs, and physician vetting. - **Pricing:** neither publishes rates in our directory; request fee schedules in writing. 02 ### Methodology This comparison uses the Medrecords service-provider directory (2026-08-15) and does not assign ratings. Verify current ownership, networks, and contracts before deciding. Rubric coverage, side by side — 8 fields [Genex Services 5 of 8](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/services/genex-services/) [ExamWorks 4 of 8](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/services/examworks/) [Mitchell International / Enlyte 3 of 8](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/services/mitchell-international-enlyte/) Genex Services publishes the most of this group at **5 of 8** ; Mitchell International / Enlyte publishes **3** . The median across all 318 vendors profiled here is 5. A filled square means the field is published; an empty one means it is a question you still have to ask before a file changes hands. ### Key facts | Category | Both: IME / Peer Review / UR / Bill Review (directory segment) | | --- | --- | | ExamWorks | National IME coordination platform; directory status partial | | Genex | Managed care under Enlyte (with Mitchell); directory status partial | | Scope | Workers' comp, liability, disability | | Verdict | Conditional — choose by network needs and adjacent-service bundling | ### Sources - [ExamWorks (directory profile)](https://www.examworks.com) - [Genex Services (directory profile)](https://www.genexservices.com) - [Enlyte](https://www.enlyte.com) Medrecords AI Every line cited back to its page. Send one real record set. We return a cited chronology you can check line by line, and a human decides what it means. [Test on a file](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=content-hub-examworks-vs-genex) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/?src=content-hub-examworks-vs-genex) ### How Medrecords AI does this work Medrecords AI reads the same records these platforms handle. The difference is what comes back: a sorted, deduplicated file with a citation on every line, and a human deciding what it means. Judge it against the comparison above. [Solution — **Medical record review** — The review you were about to outsource, delivered as software — every line cited. Read more →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-record-review/?src=content-hub-examworks-vs-genex) [Product — **Medical chronology** — A dated, deduplicated timeline with a citation on every entry. Read more →](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/?src=content-hub-examworks-vs-genex) [Product — **Citations** — Every statement links back to the page and line it came from. Read more →](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/?src=content-hub-examworks-vs-genex) Test it on a file you already have. Send one real record set. You get back a cited chronology and decide for yourself whether the read holds up — no obligation either way. [Test a file](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=content-hub-examworks-vs-genex) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/?src=content-hub-examworks-vs-genex) ### Explore the Content Hub [ #### Software & platforms AI and case-management platforms across medical-record review. ](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/software/) [ #### Service providers & BPOs IME, peer review, retrieval, and BPO providers. ](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/services/) [ #### State programs Rules, AMA Guides edition, and MMI standards by state. ](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/states/) [ #### Comparisons Head-to-head vendor and program comparisons. ](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/compare/) [ #### Guides Editorial reference on report writing, MMI, and validity testing. ](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/guides/) [ #### Conferences & events Workers' comp, claims, and IME conferences with editorial takes. ](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/events/) [ #### Directories Link-out rosters of examiners, LNCs, and expert witnesses. ](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/directory/) [ #### State matrix report All 10 verified state programs, side by side. ](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/reports/ime-state-matrix-2026/) [ #### Content Hub home The full index of everything in the hub. ](https://medrecords.ai/content-hub/) Medrecords AI ### Minutes per file. Every line cited. 10¢ a page. Bring the hardest file from this page. Get a cited chronology and a report draft in minutes — every line traced to its source page, ready for your review and signature. - Minutes per file, not days - Every line cited to its source page - Flat 10¢/page, duplicates free — no license, no minimums - HIPAA-eligible · SOC 2 audit-ready [Test on a file](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=content-hub-examworks-vs-genex) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) See how Medrecords AI compares with anything on this page — over a 30-minute call, side by side. Last verified: 2026-08-15