# Medrecords AI Product Tour | Cited Medical Record Review

> Tour the Medrecords AI workflow using one clearly labeled demonstration case: intake, cited review, drafting, and professional verification.

Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/product-tour/

---
Product tour

## Follow one record from intake to professional review.

Product tour screens below use one demonstration fixture to show how Medrecords AI moves from intake through cited review, drafting, and verification. The case is fictional and the numbers stay consistent across each step. Product outputs remain drafts until a qualified reviewer checks the cited source and decides what to approve.

DEMONSTRATION DATA**Case #IME-4812** Adams, Timothy · right knee

### Four stages, one consistent case.

Intake and quality control

### Make the file reviewable before analysis.

The demonstration begins with two source packets. Duplicate material is removed from the working set and a possible wrong-patient page is quarantined for a reviewer instead of silently included.

**342** source pages across 2 packets
**11** duplicate pages removed
**p. 140** wrong-patient page quarantined for review
**2 packets** kept traceable to their source
**Reviewer boundary:** quarantine is a flag for human resolution, not an automated patient-identity determination.
Cited chronology

### Move through the treatment arc with the source attached.

The right-knee demonstration highlights seven visits showing improvement since 4/02. A reviewer can inspect each cited source page, correct the extracted facts, and decide how the pattern should be characterized.

**7 visits** shown in the relevant treatment sequence
**Since 4/02** improvement pattern surfaced for review
**Reviewer boundary:** the timeline organizes evidence; it does not decide causation, prognosis, or case merit.
Structured drafting

### Turn the physician’s dictation into a reviewable draft.

In this demonstration, a 14-minute dictation becomes a 2,140-word draft with 38 template fields populated. The draft stays connected to its supporting material and remains editable before any professional sign-off.

**14 min** source dictation
**2,140 words** structured draft output
**38 fields** template fields populated for review
**Reviewer boundary:** the physician or other qualified professional owns the opinion, edits the draft, and approves the final report.
Professional verification

### Keep the source and the decision-maker visible.

The last stage is not an automated verdict. The reviewer inspects the cited record, resolves the quarantined page, edits the draft, records their reasoning, and decides whether the work is ready for the intended downstream use.

**Source-linked** supporting material remains available for inspection
**Human-authored** opinions and final decisions stay with the professional
**Product boundary:** Medrecords AI assists review and drafting. It does not retrieve records, sign opinions, score case merit, or make automated claims decisions.

### See the workflow with your team.

Book a guided walkthrough, or start the safe file-test intake. If PHI is in scope, agreements and an approved secure transfer route come before the file.

[Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/?src=product-tour)
 [Start a guided file test](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=product-tour)