# DICOM Viewer & AI Medical Imaging Review > AI medical imaging review that reads the actual DICOM study — MRI, CT, X-ray — with a built-in PACS viewer and 3D reconstruction. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/product/imaging/ --- NewWe now read the actual MRI and CT imaging — not just the radiologist's 1-page report. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/imaging/) [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Platform](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) › — Medical Imaging Review DICOM Medical Imaging Review ## Read the DICOM imaging — not just the radiology report. "The report is one reader's summary. The study is the evidence." DICOM medical imaging review means reading the study itself, not just the radiology report: ingest full MRI, CT, and X-ray studies as native DICOM, view them in a built-in PACS viewer with 3D reconstruction, and see every imaging event placed directly on the case timeline — a capability no other tool in the category has. [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=product-imaging) MRI · L-Spine · Ochoa, M. PACS viewer A P T2 TSE · SAG IM 18 / 24 L1 L2 L3 L4 4.2 mm L5 S1 Series 3 · 24 slices · L4–L5 flagged — On the timeline — 03/22 DICOM-native MRI · CT · X-ray: the study itself, not just the report 3D reconstruction and measurement, in the browser 0 installs OHIF-based PACS viewer, no workstation, no discs ### From disc to timeline. Pipeline 01 Study in MRI, CT, X-ray: DICOM folders, ZIPs, or discs. 02 Series detected Sagittal, axial, localizer — organized on upload, no technician. 03 Read + reconstructed PACS viewer in the browser, 3D reconstruction, measurements. 04 On the timeline Imaging events placed inline with the clinical record. ### The wedge nobody else has. DICOM-native ingestion MRI, CT, and X-ray studies load as first-class evidence, not as a 1-page report summary. Folders, discs, and ZIPs all work. Automatic series detection Studies and series are identified on upload: sagittal, axial, localizer — and organized without a technician. Integrated PACS viewer An OHIF-based viewer in the browser — scroll slices, compare series, window and measure. No radiology workstation, no install. 3D reconstruction Volume rendering for the anatomy under dispute: the herniation, the fracture, the impingement — from any series. Cite a slice like a page Citations resolve to study → series → slice, and flow into chronologies, answers, and reports exactly like a page number. On the timeline Imaging events sit inline in the chronology, so the MRI sits next to the visit that ordered it, and the story reads whole. Works with [Medical Chronology — Imaging events placed inline](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) [Medical Record Q&A — Cited answers can point to a slice](https://medrecords.ai/product/qa/) [Medical Records OCR — Studies ingest alongside documents](https://medrecords.ai/product/ocr/) Of the 25 tools in this category, zero ingest or reason over DICOM imaging. This page is the difference. ### The imaging spec sheet. Imaging Intelligence™ Modalities MRI · CT · X-ray Full studies as native DICOM — not report PDFs or screenshots. Input Folders · discs · ZIPs Studies and series detected automatically on upload. Viewer OHIF-based PACS In the browser: scroll, window, measure, compare series. No install. Reconstruction 3D volume render The disputed anatomy, rendered (for review and demonstratives). Citation depth Study · series · slice Cite imaging with the same precision as a page number. Placement Synced to timeline Every study appears as an event in the chronology, next to the visit that ordered it. ### Where the imaging decides the case. When the dispute is what the film actually shows, quoting the report isn't enough. [ Personal injury The herniation dispute is settled by the study, not the summary. For PI firms ](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/personal-injury-plaintiff/) [ Medical malpractice What the film showed vs. what the report said — side by side, dated. For med-mal ](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-malpractice/) [ IME organizations Evaluators see the imaging before the exam, not just the packet. For IME orgs ](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/ime/) [ Medical evaluators Check the finding yourself and cite the slice in your opinion. For evaluators ](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-evaluators/) FAQ ### DICOM & medical imaging review, answered. No. An OHIF-based PACS viewer is built into the platform and runs in the browser — scroll slices, compare series, window and measure. No radiology workstation, no local install, no per-seat viewer license. MRI, CT, and X-ray studies as native DICOM. Upload folders, disc images, or ZIPs; studies and series are detected and organized automatically alongside the paper record. Yes. Citations resolve to study → series → slice and behave exactly like page citations: they appear in the chronology, in Q&A answers, and carry into report drafts, where the click-through opens the viewer at that slice. As first-class events placed inline on the timeline, next to the visit that ordered them. Click an imaging event and the study opens in the viewer. The MRI is part of the story, not an attachment. The report is one reader's summary; the study is the evidence. When the dispute turns on what the film actually shows, your expert can check the finding, and cite the slice — instead of quoting someone else's interpretation. Volume rendering rebuilds the anatomy under dispute: a herniation, a fracture, an impingement — from any DICOM series. Reviewers use it to orient quickly; litigators use it as the basis for demonstratives. ### Bring the imaging into evidence. Bring a disc from a live case to the demo and watch it land on the timeline. Handled under our BAA; never used to train a model. [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=product-imaging)