# Litigation Chart Packages & Special Reports > Litigation chart packages: 9 chart types — comparative injury charts, pain and suffering graphs, medication and injury timelines — every data point cited. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/product/litigation-chart-packages/ --- NewWe now read the actual MRI and CT imaging — not just the radiologist's 1-page report. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/imaging/) [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Product](https://medrecords.ai/product/) › — Litigation Chart Packages LITIGATION CHART PACKAGES ## 9 chart types litigators actually ask for — one template library. Litigation chart packages cover the 9 chart types litigators actually ask for — comparative charts, treatment charts, pain and medication graphs, injury timelines, and more. All 9 are built from Custom Report Builder's template engine rather than 9 separate tools, and every data point is cited to its page and source, so each chart can survive cross-examination. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=product-litigation-chart-packages) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) Chart library · Case #IME-4812 9 templates PAIN & SUFFERING TREATMENT INJURY TIMELINE MEDICATION COMPARATIVE PRIOR VS. POST PROVIDER BILLING & DAMAGES TREATMENT GAP Adams, Timothy — right knee Assemble packet → 9 chart types One template library, one engine Every point cited Each data point traces to page & source One packet per case Multiple charts, shared citation index ### The 9 charts, named. Litigation teams request the same exhibits over and over, so they live in one library: comparative injury, treatment summary, pain and suffering, medication timeline, injury timeline, prior-versus-post comparison, provider encounter, billing and damages, and treatment gap. Pick what the case needs; skip what it doesn't. Templates, not bespoke builds — consistent across cases All 9 draw from the same processed, source-verified record Pain & suffering graph — draft — 7 visits since 4/02 Apr 02 · p.61 — May 07 · p.104 — May 21 · p.117 Documented pain scores, **improving since 4/02** — each point cited to its note. Packet builder — this case Injury timeline chart included Pain & suffering graph included Billing & damages chart included Comparative injury chart skipped One packet, shared citation index Export packet → ### Assemble the packet the case actually needs. A soft-tissue case wants the pain graph and treatment gap chart; a surgical case wants the injury timeline and damages chart. Choose per case, and the selected charts assemble into one exhibit-ready packet with consistent formatting and a shared citation index. Mix and match any of the 9 per case Word and PDF export, your firm's formatting ### One template engine underneath. Here's the honest architecture: all 9 charts are templates built on the same engine as [Custom Report Builder](https://medrecords.ai/product/custom-report-builder/) . Not 9 tools with 9 pipelines — one extraction pass, one source-verified dataset, 9 ways to render it. That's why the medication graph never contradicts the treatment chart: they're 2 views of the same data, not 2 tools' opinions. One engine, 9 renderings Custom Report Builder engine One dataset · every fact cited Chart packages 9 litigation chart templates Custom reports Your own templates & letterhead Audit-grade by design ### Charts built to survive cross-examination. A chart without citations is an exhibit waiting to be challenged. Every plotted point, bar, and row here traces to the page and source it came from, and anything the engine couldn't read with confidence is flagged rather than graphed. The chart argues nothing; it shows what the record says, with receipts. [See how citations work ](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/) Data point → source — Adams, T. · #IME-4812 Pain & suffering graph — point detail · Apr 02 — initial eval, right knee — p.61 · May 07 — procedure note — p.104 · May 21 — follow-up, improving — p.117 p.140 unreadable — excluded and flagged, not plotted flagged, not guessed ### From record to exhibit packet. 3 steps — no spreadsheet gymnastics, no design software. 01 Upload the record One extraction pass reads the whole file — pain scores, medications, treatments, bills, dates. 02 Pick the chart types Choose any of the 9 templates the case calls for — singly or as a packet. 03 Review the cited drafts Charts arrive as drafts with every data point cited — you verify, adjust, and export. ### Who builds chart packages. Built for legal teams — the exhibits change, the engine doesn't. [ Personal injury firms Pain graphs and damages charts for the demand package and mediation. For PI firms ](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/personal-injury-plaintiff/) [ Defense counsel Treatment gap and prior-versus-post charts that show what the record actually supports. For defense teams ](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/legal/) [ Med-mal teams Injury timelines and provider encounter charts for expert review and trial prep. For med-mal teams ](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-malpractice/) FAQ ### Litigation charts, answered. Comparative injury chart, treatment summary chart, pain and suffering graph, medication timeline graph, injury timeline chart, prior-versus-post-incident comparison, provider encounter chart, billing and damages chart, and treatment gap chart. They're templates in one library, so a new case can generate any of them from the same processed record. The engine extracts every documented pain score, functional limitation, and subjective complaint from the record and plots them over time, each point cited to the note it came from. The chart shows what the record says, page by page — it doesn't editorialize, because the jury argument is your job, not the software's. Yes. Pick the chart types the case needs — say, an injury timeline, a medication graph, and a billing chart — and the package assembles them into one exhibit-ready packet with a shared citation index. One case, one packet, consistent formatting throughout. No — and that's deliberate. All 9 are templates on Custom Report Builder's engine, drawing from the same extracted, source-verified case data. That's why the medication graph and the treatment chart never contradict each other: they're 2 views of one dataset, not 2 tools' opinions. Every one. Each plotted point, bar, and row traces to the page and source document it came from, so a chart can be handed to opposing counsel or an expert with its receipts attached. A chart without citations is an exhibit waiting to be challenged; these are built the other way. ### Related capabilities. Charts are one output of the case file — here's what pairs with them. [ Custom Report Builder The parent engine — your own templates, formats, and letterhead. See report builder ](https://medrecords.ai/product/custom-report-builder/) [ Settlement Demand Letter The demand draft the chart packet usually rides along with. See demand letters ](https://medrecords.ai/product/settlement-demand-letter/) [ Deposition & Cross-Exam Prep Outlines Cited outlines for questioning, built from the same case data. See prep outlines ](https://medrecords.ai/product/deposition-prep-outlines/) [ Deposition Digest Testimony summarized and cited — the companion to the medical exhibits. See deposition digest ](https://medrecords.ai/product/deposition-digest/) ### See a chart package built from one of your own cases. Upload a file and get back a cited sample chart — or book a quick demo and pick the 9 apart. Handled under our BAA; never used to train a model. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=product-litigation-chart-packages) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [All capabilities →](https://medrecords.ai/product/)