# APS Summary Services > Attending-physician statements and treating records condensed into a concise, cited summary built for the decision in front of you. AI never scores risk. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/aps-medical-summary/ --- NewWe now read the actual MRI and CT imaging — not just the radiologist's 1-page report. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/imaging/) [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) › — APS Medical Summary APS SUMMARY SERVICES ## APS summaries — hours of attending-physician records, minutes of reading. APS summary services condense attending-physician statements and treating records into a concise, cited summary structured for the decision in front of you. Hours of attending-physician records become minutes of reading, with every statement linked to its source. The AI summarizes and cites; it never scores risk or makes the decision. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=aps-medical-summary) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) Click any chip → the source page it cites APS summary · Case #IME-4812 minutes Adams, Timothy · treating records Condition thread — improving since 4/02, 7 visits tracked Medications & dosages — extracted, dated cited Records gap — 6/12–7/30 no entries flagged Visits 7 Conditions 3 Cited 100% ### The APS is back. The reading shouldn't take another week. Most attending-physician statements go out to a summary vendor: a queue measured in days, a dollar or more per page, and a summary you take on faith. Keep the reading with you instead. The summary is ready in minutes, every line pointing at its source page, and the records never leave your control. The underwriting call itself is graded against the carrier's own manual — Swiss Re Life Guide, Munich Re ALLFINANZ/MIRA, RGA's Global Underwriting Manual, Gen Re's GUM — and the record has to hold up under 3 separate referees later: the post-issue audit that re-pulls the file and checks whether a human underwriter would call it the same way, mortality slippage tracking, and reinsurance treaty audits. A summary with gaps papered over doesn't survive any of the 3. The same deliverable, 2 ways Turnaround 3–10 days at a summary vendor Minutes Pricing $1+ / page Flat 10¢ / page Citations Take their word Every line, click-through Data control Records at a vendor Never leave your control Summary sections · Case #IME-4812 cited 100% Packet — 342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicated — logged Condition thread — Improving since 4/02 · 7 visits — tracked Medications — Extracted, with dosages & dates — cited Records gap — 6/12–7/30 no entries — flagged Risk score / decision — Not produced — yours to make — you 3 conditions · 7 visits · cited 100% · no scores, no decisions How it works ### 3 steps between the packet and the decision. 01 #### Upload the APS packet The attending-physician statements and treating records you already have, in any format. In the demo case, 342 pages across 2 packets, with 11 duplicate pages removed before the reading starts. 02 #### The AI summarizes, every line cited Condition threads, medication lists with dosages and dates, visit history: each line linked to its source page. Gaps in the record are flagged in their own line, never smoothed over. 03 #### You read, verify, and decide Click any line to the page it cites, export the summary into your workflow, and make the decision against your own criteria. The AI never scores risk and never decides. The boundary, in writing ### A summary that knows what it isn't. The summary reports what the record says and where it says it. No risk score, no rating, no recommendation: those belong to you and your criteria, and the platform is built so they stay there. In the demo case, 11 of 342 pages — about 3% of the packet — were exact duplicates, removed before a human ever spends a minute rereading them. Duplicate-heavy EHR exports are the norm on APS files, not the exception, and the density is logged the same way the gap is: in the open, not smoothed away. In the demo case, the record showed no entries between 6/12 and 7/30. The summary flags the gap in its own line instead of papering over it, because a clean-looking timeline you can't trust is worse than a gap you can see. When someone asks how the summary was produced, the audit trail answers for you. Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable 08:12 — Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packets — system 08:31 — 11 pages deduplicated — system 08:47 — Gap flagged — 6/12–7/30 no entries — system 08:54 — Summary complete · 3 conditions · cited 100% — system 09:20 — Summary reviewed · citations verified — reviewer 09:26 — Summary exported · decision made off-platform — reviewer Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery Why Medrecords AI ### The rules the platform never breaks. EVERY LINE CITED CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T. 342 pp 2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4 4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61 p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Medrecords AI Read every page · cite every line #### HIPAA, under a signed BAA Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte. #### Never trains a model Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's. #### Every line cited If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page. #### Deleted after delivery Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access. Powered by the platform ### 4 capabilities behind every summary. The APS summary is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record. [ #### Medical summary reports The whole packet condensed into a structured, readable summary, every line linked to the page it came from. IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets → one cited summary · Cited 100% ](https://medrecords.ai/product/summaries/) [ #### Condition progression tracking Each condition followed visit by visit across the record, so the trajectory reads in one line instead of 40 pages. IN ACTION · condition thread → improving since 4/02 across 7 visits ](https://medrecords.ai/product/condition-progression-tracking/) [ #### Smart lists Medications, diagnoses, and providers pulled into clean, dated lists, each entry citing the page it was extracted from. IN ACTION · medications & dosages → extracted, dated, cited ](https://medrecords.ai/product/smart-lists/) [ #### Missing records identification Gaps in the timeline surfaced before you read, so you know what the packet is missing, not just what it contains. IN ACTION · 6/12–7/30 → no entries, flagged before reading starts ](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) FAQ ### APS summaries, answered. No. The summary reports what the record says and where it says it: conditions, medications, visits, gaps, every line cited to its source page. It produces no risk score, no rating, no recommendation. The decision, and the criteria behind it, are entirely yours. A structured summary with condition threads, medication lists (dosages and dates included), and visit history, each line linked to its source page. Everything is exportable, so the summary drops into whatever workflow the decision happens in. In the demo case, 342 pages became a summary tracking 3 conditions across 7 visits, cited 100%. No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes. Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte. Your records are never used to train any AI model (ours or anyone else's), and files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access. Gaps are flagged, never papered over. In the demo case, the record showed no entries between 6/12 and 7/30; the summary says exactly that, in its own flagged line, instead of smoothing the timeline. What a gap means for the decision is your call — the summary just makes sure you see it. ### Read the summary, not the stack. AI summarizes and cites. You decide. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=aps-medical-summary) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [See the Life & Disability Underwriting lane →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/life-disability-underwriting/) [See all specialties →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-record-review/)