# Deposition Summary Services > Page-line, topic, and narrative formats in minutes — because the transcript lives next to the medical file, contradicting testimony gets flagged and cited. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/deposition-summary/ --- NewWe now read the actual MRI and CT imaging — not just the radiologist's 1-page report. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/imaging/) [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) › — Deposition Summary DEPOSITION SUMMARY SERVICES ## Deposition summaries, cross-checked against the medical record. Deposition summary services turn transcripts into page-line, topic, and narrative summaries in minutes. Because the transcript lives next to the medical file, testimony that contradicts the record gets flagged and cited on both sides — the transcript line and the medical-record page — so every contradiction can be checked at the source. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=deposition-summary) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) Click any chip → the source page it cites Deposition summary · Case #IME-4812 minutes Adams, Timothy · right knee · deposition Transcript summarized — page-line + topic summarized Testimony: "no prior knee pain" — contradicts PCP note conflict · p.214 Both sides cited — transcript p.88 · record p.214 cited Formats 3 Conflicts 1 Cited 100% ### Everyone summarizes the transcript. Nobody checks it against the record. 7 or more AI tools already sell "summaries in minutes." Speed is table stakes now. What none of them hold is the medical record, sitting next to the transcript. So when the witness says "no prior knee pain" and the PCP note says otherwise, this is where it gets caught: flagged, with both sides cited, for you to weigh. The same deliverable, 2 ways Turnaround 3–7 days at a summary service Minutes Pricing $1.50–$3 / transcript page Included Record cross-check Not offered Every claim, both sides cited Data control Transcript at a vendor Never leaves your control Cross-check · Case #IME-4812 both sides cited Injury onset — Matches ER note 2/14 — p.4 Imaging testimony — Matches MRI 3/02 — p.18 Surgery testimony — Matches op note 4/18 — p.61 Prior knee pain — "None" — contradicts PCP note — conflict · p.214 What it means — Left to you — never auto-judged — attorney 3 formats generated · 1 conflict flagged · cited 100% How it works ### 3 steps between the transcript and the cross-check. 01 #### Upload the transcript and the record The deposition transcript goes in next to the medical file you already have. In the demo case, that file runs 342 pages across 2 packets. 02 #### The AI summarizes and cross-checks, every line cited Page-line, topic, and chronological summaries draft in minutes, and every factual claim in the testimony is checked against the record. Agreements cite their source page; contradictions get flagged with both pages cited. 03 #### You review, weigh, and export Verify any citation with a click, decide what each conflict means, and export a hyperlinked DOCX that links back to the transcript and record pages. Flagged, never judged ### The contradiction is flagged. The judgment stays yours. A flagged conflict is only useful if you can stand it up in a motion or across a deposition table. So every flag carries both citations: the transcript page where the witness said it, and the record page that says otherwise. Nothing is characterized as a lie, an error, or an impeachment; that call is yours. In the demo case, "no prior knee pain" at transcript p.88 sits across from a PCP note at record p.214. Both pages are one click away, and the audit trail shows exactly how the flag was raised and who reviewed it. Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable 08:12 — Transcript uploaded · record on file, 342 pp — system 08:16 — Summaries drafted · page-line / topic / chronological — system 08:19 — Conflict flagged · transcript p.88 vs record p.214 — system 08:19 — Both sides cited · no judgment rendered — system 09:05 — Conflict reviewed — attorney 09:20 — Hyperlinked DOCX exported — attorney Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery Why Medrecords AI ### The rules the platform never breaks. EVERY LINE CITED CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T. 342 pp 2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4 4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61 p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Medrecords AI Read every page · cite every line #### HIPAA, under a signed BAA Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte. #### Never trains a model Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's. #### Every line cited If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page. #### Deleted after delivery Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access. Powered by the platform ### 4 capabilities behind every summary. The deposition summary is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record. [ #### Deposition digest One transcript, 3 formats: page-line, topic, and chronological narrative. Every line of each format pins back to its transcript page. IN ACTION · 1 transcript → 3 formats, every line pinned to its page ](https://medrecords.ai/product/deposition-digest/) [ #### Medical Record Q&A Ask the record what the witness claimed, in plain English. Every answer comes back cited to its source page in the file. IN ACTION · "Any prior knee complaints?" → PCP note, record p.214 ](https://medrecords.ai/product/qa/) [ #### Verifiable AI Citations Every claim in the summary links to its source: the transcript page on one side, the record page on the other. Click either to verify. IN ACTION · 1 conflict → transcript p.88 · record p.214, both cited ](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/) [ #### Supplemental record review Records that arrive after the deposition are read into the same case and checked against the testimony already on file. IN ACTION · 342 pp on file → new pages cross-checked on arrival ](https://medrecords.ai/product/supplemental-record-review/) FAQ ### Deposition summaries, answered. 3: page-line summaries that track the transcript page by page, topic summaries that group testimony by subject, and narrative (chronological) summaries that read as one account. All 3 come from the same run, and every line links back to its transcript page. Every factual claim in the testimony is checked against the medical record you uploaded. When the 2 disagree — the witness denies prior knee pain, the PCP note documents it — the conflict is flagged with both sides cited: transcript page and record page. It is flagged, never auto-judged. What the contradiction means is for you to decide. No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes. Yes. Upload each transcript to the same case; each one is summarized in all 3 formats and cross-checked against the same medical file. Conflicts are flagged per deponent and cited to each transcript, so you can see which testimony the record supports. A hyperlinked DOCX. Every line of the summary links back to its transcript page, and every cross-check links to the record page it cites. The links survive export, so anyone reading the summary can verify a claim with a click. ### The summary every service sells. The cross-check nobody else has. Flagged and cited on both sides. You decide what it means. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=deposition-summary) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [See all specialties →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-record-review/)