# Domestic Violence Injury Record Review > Record review for domestic violence and strangulation claims: emergency visits, imaging, forensic examinations and injury patterns across years, page-cited. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/domestic-violence-injury-record-review/ --- New — **Missing Records Detection:** flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) › — Domestic Violence Injury Review DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INJURY RECORD REVIEW ## Strangulation leaves little on the skin and a great deal in the chart. Domestic violence injury record review services assemble the pattern a single visit never shows: emergency department presentations across years, imaging, documented injuries, forensic examination findings and the explanations recorded each time, all page-cited. Every clinical and legal conclusion stays with the professional. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=domestic-violence-injury-record-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) Click any row → the source page it cites Injury pattern record digest · Case #IME-4812 documented Adams, Timothy · patient record 342 pp / 2 packets received logged 11 duplicate pages removed free p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100% ### The documentation protocols are published. The court reads what was recorded. We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In domestic violence and strangulation claims, both are already published. The standard and the referee The rulebook - The forum’s domestic violence and strangulation statutes, which in most states now grade non-fatal strangulation as a felony and turn on documented signs and symptoms rather than visible injury - The Training Institute on Strangulation Prevention’s recommended documentation and imaging protocol, against which an emergency department record is read for what it should contain - The International Association of Forensic Nurses scope and standards of practice and the DOJ National Protocol for Sexual Assault Medical Forensic Examinations, where a forensic examination was performed - The forum’s protective order statute and its evidentiary standard, which is what a petition has to meet The referee - The prosecutor and the criminal court on a strangulation or assault charge, reading the medical record for the documented findings the statute names - The family court deciding a protective order or a custody modification on the same records - The civil jury, where the conduct is pled as an intentional tort or against a third party A pattern spread across six emergency visits that nobody had ever read as one file From 10¢ to as low as 5¢/page here, duplicates free Injury pattern record digest · Case #IME-4812 cited 100% Packet — 342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicated — logged Presentation history — Every visit, facility, date and complaint — cited Documented injuries — Site, description, imaging, photographs on file — cited Recorded explanations — The mechanism given at each presentation — flagged Digest delivered · cited 100% · no forensic conclusion How it works ### 3 steps between the records and the case. 01 #### Send every record, from every facility Emergency department and urgent care visits, primary care, imaging and radiology reports, forensic nursing examination records, dental and ENT records, and behavioural health notes, in any format. 02 #### Get the digest back as one pattern Presentations across facilities and years assembled on a single cited timeline, with documented injuries, imaging and the explanation recorded at each visit carried as their own rows. 03 #### The clinician or counsel builds the case Forensic interpretation is the examiner’s and the legal theory is counsel’s. The digest is the cited record the pattern is read from. The boundary, in writing ### A cited record, not a forensic conclusion. We assemble and cite what the records document. We do not interpret injury patterns, opine on mechanism or on whether findings are consistent with an account, diagnose strangulation, or reach any conclusion about what happened. Those belong to the forensic examiner, to counsel and to the court. These files are scattered by design: different facilities, different years, different names on the chart. Nothing is inferred from that scattering. The digest carries each presentation with its own recorded explanation, and the pattern is the professional’s to read. Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable 08:12 — Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packets — system 08:31 — 11 pages deduplicated — system 08:44 — p.140 flagged — wrong patient — system 08:54 — Injury pattern record digest complete · digest delivered · cited 100% — system 09:20 — Injury pattern record digest reviewed · citations verified — reviewer 09:26 — Injury pattern record digest exported · petition exhibit assembled by counsel — reviewer Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery Why Medrecords AI ### The rules the platform never breaks. EVERY LINE CITED CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T. 342 pp 2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4 4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61 p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Medrecords AI Read every page · cite every line #### HIPAA, under a signed BAA Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte. #### Never trains a model Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's. #### Every line cited If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page. #### Deleted after delivery Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access. Powered by the platform ### 7 capabilities behind every injury pattern record digest. The injury pattern digest is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record. [ #### Medical Records OCR Records from every facility are read in full, including the handwritten triage notes where the first account is usually recorded. IN ACTION · 640 pp / 9 facilities, read in full ](https://medrecords.ai/product/ocr/) [ #### Medical Chronology Presentations across years assemble on one timeline, so a pattern nobody could see in six separate charts becomes readable. IN ACTION · first presentation → current, one timeline ](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) [ #### Verifiable AI Citations Every injury and every recorded explanation links to its page, so a petition or a charging decision rests on the record itself. IN ACTION · digest → cited 100% ](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/) [ #### Medical Summary Reports It exports into the forensic examiner’s report, a protective order petition exhibit, or counsel’s chronology. IN ACTION · digest → petition exhibit ](https://medrecords.ai/product/summaries/) [ #### Medical Record Deduplication Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter. IN ACTION · 40 charts → duplicate visit notes collapsed to 1 record each ](https://medrecords.ai/product/medical-record-deduplication/) [ #### Missing Records Identification A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board. IN ACTION · prescribing pattern cross-checked → gaps flagged before submission ](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) [ #### Cross-Exam Simulator (beta) A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This beta tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice. IN ACTION · prescribing pattern → likely hearing questions mapped (beta) ](https://medrecords.ai/product/cross-exam-simulator/) FAQ ### Domestic violence injury review, answered. No. Whether findings are consistent with a reported mechanism is a forensic clinical judgment and it belongs to the examiner. We assemble the cited record: every presentation, every documented finding and every recorded explanation. Because the pattern is usually the evidence. Six visits to four facilities over three years read as one cited timeline show something no single chart does, and most strangulation statutes turn on documented signs across time rather than on visible injury at one visit. Yes. The cited digest exports as a petition exhibit, with each documented injury opening the record page it sits on, so the petition rests on the chart rather than on a summary of it. No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes. ### Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read. No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=domestic-violence-injury-record-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [See every case type we process →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/case-types/)