# Clinical Endpoint Adjudication Packets > De-identified, chronologically ordered event packets for blinded CEC review — redacted to the charter and page-cited to the source documents. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/endpoint-adjudication-packets/ --- [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) ›Endpoint Adjudication Packets CLINICAL ENDPOINT ADJUDICATION PACKETS ## The committee must stay blinded. The packet has to make that true. Clinical endpoint adjudication packet services build the blinded event dossiers a CEC reviews: source documents redacted to the charter's blinding rules, ordered chronologically, and page-cited throughout. The committee adjudicates the endpoint; the assembly and redaction stop being the trial's critical path. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=endpoint-adjudication-packets) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) Click any row → the source page it cites Event packet · Case #IME-4812 documented Adams, Timothy · suspected endpoint event 342 pp / 2 packets received logged 11 duplicate pages removed free p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100% ### The charter is written. So is the committee that applies it. We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In endpoint adjudication, both are already written. The standard and the referee The rulebook - The adjudication charter, which defines the endpoint definitions, the required source documents, and exactly what must be redacted to preserve blinding - ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice, which governs source data, documentation and the trial's quality system - 21 CFR Part 11, where the packets and the adjudication decisions live in a validated electronic system - The protocol's own endpoint definitions, which the charter operationalizes The referee - The Clinical Endpoint Committee, whose blinded adjudication is the outcome of record - The sponsor's quality assurance function and the trial's independent monitors - The regulator at review, where an unblinded or incomplete packet undermines the endpoint data Coordinator hours per event assembling and redacting source documents by hand Flat 10¢/page here, duplicates free Event packet · Case #IME-4812 cited 100% Packet342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicatedlogged Source documentsOrdered to the event timelinecited Blinding redactionsApplied per the charter, loggedredacted Missing sourceCharter-required document absentflagged Packet delivered · cited 100% · no adjudication How it works ### 3 steps between the site documents and the committee. 01 #### Send the source documents Hospital records, imaging, ECGs, laboratory reports and site narratives for the suspected event, in any format and any language of origin. 02 #### We return the packet, redacted and page-cited Documents ordered to the event timeline, redacted to the charter's blinding rules with every removal logged, and charter-required documents that are missing flagged. 03 #### The committee adjudicates Endpoint classification is the CEC's decision, made blinded, under the charter. We never adjudicate, classify an event, or assess causality. The boundary, in writing ### An assembled packet, never an adjudicated endpoint. We assemble, order, redact and cite the source documents the charter requires. We do not adjudicate the event, classify an endpoint, assess causality or relatedness, or make any determination the charter reserves to the committee. Blinded adjudication is the committee's function and stays there. Every redaction is logged with the rule that required it, so the sponsor's quality function can verify that blinding was applied consistently rather than taking it on trust. Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable 08:12Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packetssystem 08:3111 pages deduplicatedsystem 08:44p.140 flagged — wrong patientsystem 08:54Event packet complete · packet complete · redactions logged · cited 100%system 09:20Event packet reviewed · citations verifiedreviewer 09:26Event packet exported · adjudication recorded off-platformreviewer Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery Why Medrecords AI ### The rules the platform never breaks. EVERY LINE CITED CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T.342 pp 2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4 4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61 p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Medrecords AI Read every page · cite every line #### HIPAA, under a signed BAA Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte. #### Never trains a model Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's. #### Every line cited If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page. #### Deleted after delivery Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access. Powered by the platform ### 4 capabilities behind every event packet. The event packet is 1 deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record. [ #### Medical Records OCR Every source document read in full — hospital records, ECG tracings, laboratory reports, handwritten site notes — nothing skipped, nothing guessed. IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets → 27 documents, read in full ](https://medrecords.ai/product/ocr/) [ #### Medical Chronology The event builds itself into a chronology, so the committee reads a sequence rather than a stack of undated documents. IN ACTION · first symptom → event → outcome, 1 continuous timeline ](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) [ #### Verifiable AI Citations If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every element of the packet links to the source document page it came from. IN ACTION · every packet element → cited 100% ](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/) [ #### Medical Summary Reports The packet formats straight into the adjudication system — your template, your charter's structure. IN ACTION · event packet → committee-ready dossier ](https://medrecords.ai/product/summaries/) FAQ ### Endpoint adjudication packets, answered. No. Endpoint classification is the Clinical Endpoint Committee's blinded decision under the charter. We assemble, order, redact and cite the source documents the charter requires, so the committee adjudicates from a complete packet rather than a partial one. Redactions are applied per the charter's own rules and every removal is logged with the rule that required it. That log lets the sponsor's quality function verify blinding was applied consistently, instead of accepting it on assurance. It's flagged in the packet rather than quietly omitted. A committee adjudicating without knowing a required source is absent is a data quality problem that surfaces later, usually at the worst time. No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes. ### Send 1 file. We'll tell you what we can read. No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=endpoint-adjudication-packets) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [See every case type we process →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/case-types/)