# Medico-Legal Support Services

> Review reports, affidavit support, and motion drafts produced from the structured record in minutes, every statement cited. The attorney reviews and signs.

Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/legal-support-services/

---
NewWe now read the actual MRI and CT imaging — not just the radiologist's 1-page report. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/imaging/)
[Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) › — Legal Support Services
MEDICO-LEGAL SUPPORT SERVICES

## Review reports, affidavits, motion papers — AI-drafted, attorney-signed.

The drafting work you'd send to a medico-legal support vendor, produced from the structured record in minutes: review reports, affidavit support, motion and opposition drafts, every factual statement cited to its page. The attorney reviews and signs; the AI never renders an opinion.

[Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=legal-support-services)
 [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/)
Click any chip → the source page it cites
Review report draft · Case #IME-4812
 minutes
Adams, Timothy
 · right knee
Review report — 6 sections drafted
 drafted
Fact citations — 100% traced
 cited
Signature block — reserved for counsel
 yours
Sections 6
 Citations 100%
 Opinions 0

### The draft shouldn't wait in a vendor's queue.

The usual route sends the record out to a medico-legal support vendor, waits a week or 2, and pays by the hour for drafting you then have to verify yourself. Keep the drafting with you instead: the structured record produces the review report, the affidavit support, the motion facts in minutes, every line already pointing at its source page.

The same deliverable, 2 ways
Turnaround
 1–2 weeks at a support vendor

 Minutes to a draft
Pricing
 $60–$150 / hr

 Included
Citations
 Trust the vendor

 Every line, click-through
Data control
 Records at a vendor

 Never leave your control
Review report sections · Case #IME-4812
 your template
Incident & presentation — ER visit 2/14 — p.4
Diagnostic imaging — MRI right knee 3/02 — p.18
Surgical intervention — Arthroscopic surgery 4/18 — p.61
Course of treatment — Improving since 4/02 · 7 visits — cited
Argument & opinion — Left blank — yours to write — counsel
6 sections drafted · cited 100% · argument reserved for counsel
How it works

### 3 steps between the record and the signature.

01

#### Upload the record you already have

The records packet as it sits in your matter file. In the demo case, 342 pages across 2 packets: duplicates removed, a wrong-patient page quarantined, the rest structured and indexed.

02

#### The AI drafts, every line cited

Review report, affidavit support, or the factual sections of a motion or opposition: your template fills section by section from the record, each factual statement linked to its source page.

03

#### Counsel reviews, signs, and exports

Write the argument, verify any citation with a click, and export on your letterhead. The work product goes out under your signature, and only yours.

Built to survive opposing counsel

### Work product you can defend line by line.

A review report or affidavit gets read by the other side, and sometimes read back to its author under oath. So the drafting is extractive: every factual statement is pulled from the record and carries its source page, and anything the record cannot support never makes it into the draft.

In the demo case, a prior-injury reference on p.140 belonged to a different patient. It was quarantined and logged, not folded into the facts. When someone asks how the document was produced, the audit trail answers for you: the AI drafted the scaffolding, counsel authored the argument and signed.

Audit trail · Case #IME-4812
 exportable
08:12 — Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packets — system
08:31 — 11 pages deduplicated — system
08:47 — p.140 quarantined — wrong patient — system
09:26 — Review report drafted · 6 sections cited — system
10:15 — Argument section authored — counsel
10:42 — Report signed & exported — counsel
Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery
Why Medrecords AI

### The rules the platform never breaks.

EVERY LINE CITED
CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T. 342 pp
2/14 — ER visit, right knee
 p.4
4/18 — arthroscopic surgery
 p.61
p.140 — wrong patient
 quarantined
Medrecords AI
Read every page · cite every line

#### HIPAA, under a signed BAA

Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.

#### Never trains a model

Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.

#### Every line cited

If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.

#### Deleted after delivery

Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.

Powered by the platform

### 4 capabilities behind every draft.

The legal work product is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.

[

#### Custom report builder

Your firm's review-report format, your affidavit structure, your letterhead. The draft fills the sections; the structure stays yours.

IN ACTION · Case #IME-4812 → 6 sections drafted on the firm's template, cited 100%
](https://medrecords.ai/product/custom-report-builder/)
 [

#### Deposition digest

Testimony digested against the medical record, so what was said and what was documented sit side by side, page-cited both ways.

IN ACTION · 342 pp record → digest keyed to p.4 · p.18 · p.61
](https://medrecords.ai/product/deposition-digest/)

 [

#### Case merit & standard-of-care assessment

Signals from the record scored against standard of care — provisional until a professional reviews and signs off.

IN ACTION · 7 visits improving since 4/02 → consistency tracked across the record
](https://medrecords.ai/product/case-merit-assessment/)
[

#### Medical literature & standard-of-care matching

The facts of the record matched against published literature and standards of care, cited on both sides: the record page and the source.

IN ACTION · Arthroscopic surgery 4/18 p.61 → matched to standard-of-care references
](https://medrecords.ai/product/medical-literature-standard-of-care-matching/)
FAQ

### Medico-legal support, answered.

No. The AI drafts the factual and medical scaffolding of the document — the treatment history, the record facts, the chronology — with every statement cited to its source page. The argument, the characterization, and the opinion are counsel's to write, and nothing goes out without counsel's review and signature.

Yes. The factual recitations that support an affidavit — dates of treatment, findings, procedures, gaps — are drafted directly from the record, each statement cited to its page. Counsel reviews the recitations, adds what only counsel can attest to, and the affiant signs. The AI never signs anything and never attests to anything.

No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

Yes. Bring your firm's review-report format, your affidavit structure, or the caption and layout your jurisdiction requires, and the draft populates it section by section, on your letterhead. In the demo case, a 6-section review report was drafted onto the firm's own template with every factual statement cited.

The drafting is extractive: every factual statement is pulled from the record and linked to the page it came from, so any line can be verified with a click. Anything the record cannot support never makes it into the draft, suspect pages are quarantined and logged, and the full source trail is exportable. You review every line, you edit, you sign — you remain the author of the work product.

### The drafting hours, returned to the argument.

AI drafts. Counsel decides, and signs.

[Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=legal-support-services)
 [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/)
[See all specialties →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-record-review/)
