# Maritime & Aviation Injury Record Review > Maritime and aviation injury record review: the injury chronology from the incident forward, and the pre-employment and certification history, both cited. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/maritime-aviation-injury-record-review/ --- New — **Missing Records Detection:** flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) › — Maritime & Aviation Injury Record Review MARITIME AND AVIATION INJURY RECORD REVIEW ## The concealment defense is won or lost in the pre-employment physical. Maritime and aviation injury record review services build two things the case needs: the injury chronology from the incident forward, and the pre-employment and certification medical history the employer will raise under a concealment defense. Fitness and causation opinions stay with your retained experts. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=maritime-aviation-injury-record-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) Click any row → the source page it cites Injury and fitness timeline · Case #IME-4812 documented Adams, Timothy · crew file 342 pp / 2 packets received logged 11 duplicate pages removed free p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100% ### Maintenance and cure has a defense built entirely out of records. We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In seaman and aircrew injury the governing law is federal, and one of its central defenses is decided by comparing two documents. The standard and the referee The rulebook - The Jones Act at 46 U.S.C. §30104, together with the general maritime remedies of maintenance and cure and unseaworthiness, which run until the seaman reaches maximum medical improvement - The McCorpen concealment defense, from McCorpen v. Central Gulf S.S. Corp., which asks whether the claimant concealed a material prior condition and whether it connects to the injury now claimed - 46 CFR Part 10 and the Coast Guard merchant mariner medical certification requirements, and 14 CFR Part 67 for airman medical certification - The Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act at 33 U.S.C. §901 et seq., where the claimant is a harbor worker rather than a seaman The referee - The federal district court sitting in admiralty, on maintenance and cure and on the concealment defense, which is decided on the documents rather than on testimony - The employer’s claims adjuster, who terminates maintenance and cure at maximum medical improvement on the treating record - The Coast Guard National Maritime Center and the FAA aeromedical certification branch, which hold the certification history the defense will pull A prior condition in the treating file that the employment physical never mentioned From 10¢ to as low as 5¢/page here, duplicates free Injury and fitness timeline · Case #IME-4812 cited 100% Packet — 342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicated — logged Injury course — Incident through current treatment — cited Pre-employment and certification history — Every physical, form and disclosure — cited Prior conditions — Same body part, before the employment physical — flagged Two timelines delivered · cited 100% · no fitness opinion How it works ### 3 steps between the crew file and the timelines. 01 #### Send the crew file The incident and vessel or aircraft medical records, shoreside treating charts, the pre-employment physical and any questionnaires, prior records, and the certification history, in any format. 02 #### We return two timelines, page-cited The injury course from the incident forward, and every pre-employment and certification medical contact, with each prior condition on the same body part placed against the disclosure that did or did not name it. 03 #### Your experts take it from there Maximum medical improvement, causation and materiality under the concealment defense are all expert and judicial calls, argued on these two timelines. The boundary, in writing ### Two timelines of the record, not a finding of concealment. We place the disclosures and the treating record side by side and cite where they differ. We do not conclude that a claimant concealed anything, that a condition was material, that maximum medical improvement was reached, or that the incident caused the injury. Those are for the court and your experts. In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. In a crew file that error creates a prior condition the claimant never had, which is exactly the fact a concealment defense turns on, so it is quarantined. Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable 08:12 — Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packets — system 08:31 — 11 pages deduplicated — system 08:44 — p.140 flagged — wrong patient — system 08:54 — Injury and fitness timeline complete · two timelines delivered · cited 100% — system 09:20 — Injury and fitness timeline reviewed · citations verified — reviewer 09:26 — Injury and fitness timeline exported · expert packet assembled by counsel — reviewer Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery Why Medrecords AI ### The rules the platform never breaks. EVERY LINE CITED CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T. 342 pp 2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4 4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61 p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Medrecords AI Read every page · cite every line #### HIPAA, under a signed BAA Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte. #### Never trains a model Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's. #### Every line cited If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page. #### Deleted after delivery Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access. Powered by the platform ### 7 capabilities behind every injury and fitness timeline. The injury and fitness timeline is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record. [ #### Medical Records OCR Every page read in full, including the employment physical questionnaire and its handwriting. IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets → 27 documents, read in full ](https://medrecords.ai/product/ocr/) [ #### Medical Chronology Shipboard, shoreside and certification records assemble from their own dates into one sequence. IN ACTION · pre-employment physical → current treatment, one continuous timeline ](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) [ #### Verifiable AI Citations Every entry links back to its page, on both sides of the concealment question. IN ACTION · both timelines → cited 100% ](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/) [ #### Medical Summary Reports It exports into your maintenance and cure motion or expert packet in your format. IN ACTION · timeline → expert packet ](https://medrecords.ai/product/summaries/) [ #### Medical Record Deduplication Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter. IN ACTION · 40 charts → duplicate visit notes collapsed to 1 record each ](https://medrecords.ai/product/medical-record-deduplication/) [ #### Missing Records Identification A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board. IN ACTION · prescribing pattern cross-checked → gaps flagged before submission ](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) [ #### Cross-Exam Simulator (beta) A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This beta tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice. IN ACTION · prescribing pattern → likely hearing questions mapped (beta) ](https://medrecords.ai/product/cross-exam-simulator/) FAQ ### Maritime and aviation injury record review, answered. No. We put the pre-employment questionnaire and physical beside the prior treating record, with pages, so both versions are visible. Whether the omission was intentional and material is decided by the court on the McCorpen elements. The timelines are built the same way, but LHWCA claims run on their own schedule and referee and have their own page. This one is written for Jones Act seamen and for aircrew, where the general maritime remedies apply. No. We report every treating note that addresses status and improvement, in sequence and cited. Declaring maximum medical improvement, which is what ends maintenance and cure, is a treating physician’s call. No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes. ### Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read. No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=maritime-aviation-injury-record-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [See every case type we process →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/case-types/) ### More solutions - [**The corroborating opinion is verified. So the file behind it should be too.** — Page-cited record review for Florida §766.203 presuit investigations — the file read in full before the…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/florida-certificate-of-merit/) - [**The decedent's history, read before the certification.** — Decedent history synthesis for medical examiner and coroner offices — prior treatment, medications and social…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-examiner-case-record-review/) - [**The decline, shown — serial weights, functional scores, wounds, hospitalisations.** — Terminal prognosis documentation review for hospice providers. Serial decline evidence mapped to the coverage…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/hospice-eligibility-documentation/) - [**The decree names the measure. The chart either shows it or it doesn't.** — Chart audits against a consent decree's own enumerated performance measures, page-cited, for court-appointed…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/correctional-healthcare-chart-audits/) - [**The deferral letter lists what's missing. The packet has to close it.** — Evidence packets for FAA special issuance and HIMS pilot medical certification, assembled to the protocol's own…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/faa-medical-certification-packets/) - [**The demand letter, drafted from the record — diagnoses, treatment, billing, future care, all cited.** — A jurisdiction-ready demand draft assembled from the structured file: ICD/CPT-coded specials, treatment…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/demand-letter-drafting/)