# Motor Vehicle Accident Record Review

> Motor vehicle accident record review: the ED course, every treatment gap with its dates, pre-existing findings and lien-related charges, all page-cited.

Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/motor-vehicle-accident-record-review/

---
New — **Missing Records Detection:** flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/)
[Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) › — Motor Vehicle Accident Record Review
MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENT RECORD REVIEW

## The adjuster finds the treatment gap first. So should you.

Motor vehicle accident record review services turn the crash file into a page-cited chronology: the emergency department course, every treatment gap with its exact dates, the pre-existing findings the carrier will raise, and the injury-related charges separated from unrelated care. Causation stays with your experts.

[Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=motor-vehicle-accident-record-review)
 [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/)
Click any row → the source page it cites
Crash chronology · Case #IME-4812
 documented
Adams, Timothy
 · crash file
342 pp / 2 packets received
 logged
11 duplicate pages removed
 free
p.140 — wrong patient
 quarantined
Pages 342
 Documents 27
 Cited 100%

### No-fault statutes and the threshold decide what the record has to show.

We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In auto injury litigation, both are written into the state insurance code before anyone files.

The standard and the referee
The rulebook
- The forum state’s no-fault or PIP statute, which fixes what medical benefits are payable and on what proof — N.Y. Ins. Law §5102 with 11 NYCRR 65-3, Fla. Stat. §627.736, Mich. Comp. Laws §500.3107
- The serious injury threshold in threshold states, such as N.Y. Ins. Law §5102(d), which lists the categories the treating records have to establish before a bodily injury claim survives
- 42 U.S.C. §1395y(b) and 42 CFR Part 411 Subpart B, the Medicare Secondary Payer rules under which injury-related treatment has to be separated from unrelated care before a settlement closes
- Fed. R. Evid. 702 as amended in December 2023, under which a causation opinion linking the crash to the diagnosis has to be reliably applied to this record

The referee
- The carrier’s no-fault examiner and peer reviewer, who cut or deny payment by pointing at a gap in treatment, an unrelated diagnosis, or a report that never arrived
- The trial court on a threshold motion, which measures the treating records against the statutory serious injury categories before a jury ever sees the case
- The Benefits Coordination & Recovery Center and the Commercial Repayment Center, which price the conditional payment demand from the diagnosis codes in the treatment record

A gap the other side finds in the records before you do

 From 10¢ to as low as 5¢/page here, duplicates free
Crash chronology · Case #IME-4812
 cited 100%
Packet — 342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicated — logged
Treatment gaps — Every interval over 30 days, with both dates — flagged
Pre-existing findings — Prior imaging and prior complaints, same body part — flagged
Injury-related charges — Separated from unrelated care by date and code — cited
Chronology delivered · cited 100% · no causation opinion
How it works

### 3 steps between the crash file and the chronology.

01

#### Send the crash file

The EMS run sheet, ED records, imaging reports, every treating provider’s chart, the prior records you have, and the billing, in any format.

02

#### We return the chronology, page-cited

The course of treatment from the scene forward, every gap with its exact dates, every pre-existing finding on the same body part, and the charges sorted by relation to the crash.

03

#### You build the demand

Causation, valuation and the threshold argument are yours. The chronology is the record the adjuster, the defense examiner and the court will all work from.

The boundary, in writing

### A chronology of the treatment, not an opinion that the crash caused it.

We assemble and cite what the providers wrote. We do not opine that the collision caused the herniation, rebut the defense examiner, rate impairment, or value the claim. Those belong to your treating physicians and retained experts.

In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. In a crash file that error moves a prior MRI onto the wrong plaintiff, so it is quarantined rather than folded quietly into the history.

Audit trail · Case #IME-4812
 exportable
08:12 — Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packets — system
08:31 — 11 pages deduplicated — system
08:44 — p.140 flagged — wrong patient — system
08:54 — Crash chronology complete · chronology delivered · gaps flagged · cited 100% — system
09:20 — Crash chronology reviewed · citations verified — reviewer
09:26 — Crash chronology exported · demand package assembled by counsel — reviewer
Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery
Why Medrecords AI

### The rules the platform never breaks.

EVERY LINE CITED
CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T. 342 pp
2/14 — ER visit, right knee
 p.4
4/18 — arthroscopic surgery
 p.61
p.140 — wrong patient
 quarantined
Medrecords AI
Read every page · cite every line

#### HIPAA, under a signed BAA

Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.

#### Never trains a model

Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.

#### Every line cited

If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.

#### Deleted after delivery

Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.

Powered by the platform

### 7 capabilities behind every crash chronology.

The crash chronology is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.

[

#### Medical Records OCR

Every page read in full, including the EMS run sheet and the chiropractic notes where the gap actually shows.

IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets → 27 documents, read in full
](https://medrecords.ai/product/ocr/)
 [

#### Medical Chronology

Treatment assembles itself from dates across providers, so the gaps appear as intervals rather than as an impression.

IN ACTION · scene → current treatment, one continuous timeline
](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/)
 [

#### Verifiable AI Citations

Every entry links back to its page, including the prior imaging the carrier will cite.

IN ACTION · chronology → cited 100%
](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/)
 [

#### Medical Summary Reports

It exports into your demand package in your format.

IN ACTION · chronology → demand package
](https://medrecords.ai/product/summaries/)
 [

#### Medical Record Deduplication

Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter.

IN ACTION · 40 charts → duplicate visit notes collapsed to 1 record each
](https://medrecords.ai/product/medical-record-deduplication/)
 [

#### Missing Records Identification

A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board.

IN ACTION · prescribing pattern cross-checked → gaps flagged before submission
](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/)
 [

#### Cross-Exam Simulator (beta)

A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This beta tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice.

IN ACTION · prescribing pattern → likely hearing questions mapped (beta)
](https://medrecords.ai/product/cross-exam-simulator/)
FAQ

### Motor vehicle accident record review, answered.

No. We place the mechanism described in the first medical note, the imaging findings and their dates, and any prior findings on the same body part side by side with page citations. The causation opinion is expert testimony, offered under Rule 702 by a qualified physician.

Every interval over 30 days between treating contacts is flagged with both dates and both pages, in its own state. We do not explain the gap away or characterize it. It is the first thing the adjuster and the defense examiner will look for, so it belongs in front of you before they find it.

We sort charges by date and diagnosis code and mark which relate to the crash and which do not, each cited. The conditional payment dispute itself is yours to make to the Benefits Coordination & Recovery Center, on the record we hand you.

No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

### Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.

No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.

[Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=motor-vehicle-accident-record-review)
 [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/)
[See every case type we process →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/case-types/)

### More solutions

- [**The administrative record closes at 180 days. Build it before that window shuts.** — Claim files, peer reviews, surveillance, and FCEs read into 1 cited chronology, with a point-by-point response…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/long-term-disability/)
- [**The administrative record is the whole case. Build it cited.** — Administrative record review for ERISA disability appeals — cited chronology, physician-by-physician response…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/erisa-disability-claim-file-review/)
- [**The affidavit files with the complaint. There is no discovery to fix it later.** — Page-cited record review for Georgia O.C.G.A. §9-11-9.1 expert affidavits — the file read in full before the…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/georgia-certificate-of-merit/)
- [**The allocation is only as defensible as the record behind it.** — Full claim-file review for WCMSA and LMSA allocations. Treatment, drugs, dosages and frequencies extracted and…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medicare-set-aside-record-review/)
- [**The assessment drives the payment. The visit note has to back it.** — Every OASIS item checked against the documentation behind it, with the clinical grouping and payment component…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/oasis-documentation-review/)
- [**The assessment says one thing. The chart has to say it too.** — MDS 3.0 items validated against the supporting chart documentation, with the PDPM classification impact shown…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/mds-pdpm-documentation-validation/)
