# Organ Donor Eligibility Record Review > Medical and social history synthesis for OPO donor risk assessment and transplant network documentation, page-cited and delivered against the clock. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/organ-donor-eligibility-review/ --- [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) ›Donor Eligibility Review ORGAN DONOR ELIGIBILITY RECORD REVIEW ## The window is hours. The donor's history is decades. Organ procurement record review services synthesize a potential donor's medical and social history into a page-cited summary: past conditions, infectious risk documentation, medications, and behavioural history. The OPO's clinical staff make every eligibility and allocation decision, working from a history that has actually been read. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=organ-donor-eligibility-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) Click any row → the source page it cites History synthesis · Case #IME-4812 documented Adams, Timothy · donor record set 342 pp / 2 packets received logged 11 duplicate pages removed free p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100% ### The policy is published. So is the network that enforces it. We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In organ procurement, both are already published. The standard and the referee The rulebook - OPTN policy, including the donor medical and behavioural history requirements and the risk criteria for disease transmission - The Public Health Service guideline for assessing risk of blood-borne pathogen transmission through organ transplantation - 42 CFR Part 486 Subpart G, the CMS conditions for coverage for organ procurement organizations - The OPO's own donor evaluation protocol and the accepting centres' criteria The referee - The OPTN and its Membership and Professional Standards Committee, which review policy compliance - CMS, which recertifies OPOs against outcome measures under Part 486 - The accepting transplant centre, whose surgeon makes the final acceptance decision on the organ Coordinator hours reading a lifetime of records inside a donation window measured in hours Flat 10¢/page here, duplicates free History synthesis · Case #IME-4812 cited 100% Packet342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicatedlogged Medical historyConditions with first documentationcited Infectious riskDocumented testing and exposurescited Behavioural historyAs documented, with its sourceflagged Synthesis delivered · cited 100% · no eligibility determination How it works ### 3 steps between the records and the evaluation. 01 #### Send the record set Hospital records, prior clinic notes, laboratory results, pharmacy history and the donor risk interview, in any format. 02 #### We return the synthesis, page-cited Medical history, documented infectious risk and testing, medications, and behavioural history as recorded, each line citing the page it came from. 03 #### Your clinical staff decide Donor eligibility, risk characterization and allocation are the OPO's and the accepting centre's decisions, made by clinicians under OPTN policy. The boundary, in writing ### A history synthesis, never an eligibility decision. We synthesize and cite what the record documents. We do not determine donor eligibility, characterize transmission risk, clear or rule out an organ, or make any allocation decision. Every one of those belongs to the OPO's clinical staff and the accepting transplant centre's surgeon. Behavioural and social history is carried exactly as the source records it, with the citation, and never inferred or softened. A risk factor summarized away is one the accepting centre never gets to weigh. Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable 08:12Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packetssystem 08:3111 pages deduplicatedsystem 08:44p.140 flagged — wrong patientsystem 08:54History synthesis complete · synthesis complete · history cited · cited 100%system 09:20History synthesis reviewed · citations verifiedreviewer 09:26History synthesis exported · eligibility decision made off-platformreviewer Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery Why Medrecords AI ### The rules the platform never breaks. EVERY LINE CITED CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T.342 pp 2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4 4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61 p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Medrecords AI Read every page · cite every line #### HIPAA, under a signed BAA Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte. #### Never trains a model Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's. #### Every line cited If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page. #### Deleted after delivery Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access. Powered by the platform ### 4 capabilities behind every history synthesis. The history synthesis is 1 deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record. [ #### Medical Records OCR Every record read in full — hospital charts, prior clinic notes, laboratory results, handwritten intake forms — nothing skipped, nothing guessed. IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets → 27 documents, read in full ](https://medrecords.ai/product/ocr/) [ #### Medical Chronology The donor's history builds itself into a timeline, so conditions and exposures appear in sequence rather than scattered across sources. IN ACTION · first documentation → current admission, 1 continuous timeline ](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) [ #### Verifiable AI Citations If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every line of the synthesis links to the record page behind it. IN ACTION · synthesis → cited 100% ](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/) [ #### Medical Summary Reports The synthesis formats straight into the donor record — your template, your protocol. IN ACTION · history synthesis → evaluation-ready ](https://medrecords.ai/product/summaries/) FAQ ### Donor eligibility review, answered. No. Eligibility, risk characterization and allocation are decided by the OPO's clinical staff and the accepting transplant centre's surgeon, under OPTN policy. We synthesize and cite the medical and social history those decisions are made on. Exactly as the source records it, with a citation, and never softened or inferred. A risk factor summarized away is one the accepting centre never gets to weigh, and the PHS guideline exists precisely because that judgment belongs to clinicians. The read starts in minutes from upload, because you already hold the records. The constraint in a donation window is how fast a lifetime of history can be read, and that's the part this addresses. No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes. ### Send 1 file. We'll tell you what we can read. No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=organ-donor-eligibility-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [See every case type we process →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/case-types/)