# Medical Record Review for Personal Injury — Medrecords AI > Demand support that survives scrutiny: complete specials, a clean treatment narrative, and the priors question answered before the defense asks it. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/personal-injury/ --- [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/) ›Personal Injury Medical record review for personal injury ## Every injury, treatment, and dollar — cited to the page. For personal injury law firms, Medrecords AI builds demand support that survives scrutiny — complete specials itemized to the billing page, a clean treatment narrative, and the priors question answered before the defense asks it. Every injury, treatment, and dollar is cited to its source page, with gaps in care flagged. [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=solutions-personal-injury) Demand support · Doe v. Roe specials $84,210 in specials — every line cited ER + surgical — $61,300, itemized to billingp.402–418 PT — 24 sessions, $14,880, treatment narrative cleanp.201 Priors search — none documented✓ p.06 Chronology attached as Exhibit 3ready The priors question, answered before the defense asks The status quo PI cases are won and lost in the medical record: the prior injury, the 47-day gap, the inconsistent history. Manual review is *slow, costly, and prone to miss exactly those facts.* 2–5 days of records work per demand by hand how specials get assembled 1 prior you’d rather find first ### Get the defensible blueprint, without assembling it yourself. Everything you need to assess the case: structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes the file, pulls the key medical facts, and builds summaries backed by citations, so your team works on strategy, not sorting. Case summary · auto-drafted p.12 p.47 p.118 #### Summaries: the whole case in one view A complete, structured summary that surfaces delayed care, missing records, and conflicting narratives. Every claim is traced back to the page it came from. Chronology · by date Feb 11X-Ray — Chest Apr 02Progress Note May 22MRI — Cervical imaging placed inline Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days Jul 17Consultation Report #### Automated chronology: every event in order Every page placed by date, provider, and event — with imaging inline and gaps flagged. Scroll the case instead of hunting through PDFs. Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview Consultation Report84%Review Progress Note87%Review Remove all duplicates #### Indexing & dedup: a clean, searchable file Medrecords detects duplicates, flags mismatches, and separates unrelated claimants, so the file you build on is one you can search, filter, and trust. Cross-checked · multi-modelCase #12345 Patient nameJane Doe✓ Date of birth1985-04-15✓ DiagnosisRight arm fracture✓ Diagnosis codeS42.301A✓ Surgery date2024-10-07✓ #### Built to be verified (not just believed) Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged — so your verification is a click, not a re-read. Adapts to each claim ### Built for the injury case. Liability, causation, damages: the whole dispute runs through the medical record. Medrecords gives you the structured, cited version of it. Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847 PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index 1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged 1 DICOM study Organized recordby provider · date 01Jul 17Medical Records 02Jul 17Billing Statements 03Aug 06Physician Notes 612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case → #### Catch the prior injury before the other side does Pre-existing conditions, earlier claims, and inconsistent histories surfaced and cited — the facts that reframe causation, found early. #### Damages traced to the page Every treatment, charge, and course of care linked to its source, support for demands and defenses that survives scrutiny. Who this is for ### The other side has read the priors. Have you? PI turns on who knows the record better. Medrecords reads all of it: the priors, the gaps, the inconsistent histories — and hands you the cited version before strategy is set. Prior injuries and inconsistencies surfaced first Damages and treatment traced to the page Cited support for demands and defenses alike Record intelligence · Doe v. Roe cited Priors search — 2 earlier claims found2019 · 2021 History conflict — ER intake vs. PCP notep.88 · p.412 Specials — $84,210 traced to billingitemized Chronology attached to demandEx. 3 Know the record better than the other side The objection ### "We already have paralegals for this." Keep them: as reviewers, not readers. Staff verify cited findings in minutes instead of assembling them for days, the specials arrive complete, and the demand goes out this week instead of next month. Who we serve ### One platform. Built for everyone who works the file. The same defensible, cited record, shaped to how each team reads it: the case, the claim, or the exam. Roles [Medical EvaluatorsDefensible IME opinions, faster](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-evaluators/) [Claims AdjustersTriage and settle sooner](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/insurance/) [Defense LawyersSurface the case-deciding fact](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/legal/) [Legal Nurse ConsultantsChronologies in a fraction of the time](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/legal-nurse-consultants/) Organizations [Insurance CarriersScale review across every claim](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/insurance-carriers/) [Law FirmsLitigation-ready case files](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/law-firms/) [TPAs & Case ManagementStandardize across clients](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/tpas/) [Government & Public SectorCompliant, auditable records](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/government/) Use Cases [Workers' CompensationTrack treatment and gaps](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/workers-comp/) [Medical MalpracticeReconstruct the timeline](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-malpractice/) [Personal InjuryCited evidence on demand](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/personal-injury/) [Independent Medical ExamsStructured, exam-ready packets](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/ime/) [Not sure which fits? Talk to us about Enterprise ](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) New · Case Outcome Benchmarks ### What's the case worth? Answer with a cohort, not a hunch. Success-likelihood and value ranges built from comparable resolved cases: matched on injury, treatment, and venue — with every case-side driver cited to your record. Kept in a work-product workspace, never in the evidence file. [Explore Outcome Benchmarks ](https://medrecords.ai/product/benchmarks/) Valuation · Ochoa v. Delgadowork product · separate file Success likelihood72–81% Indicated range$145k–$240k · median $186k +Objective imaging — 4.2 mm herniationMRI·s3·sl18 +ESI injection + surgical consultp.318 −6-week treatment gapflag §4 +No documented priorsp.06 1,284 comparable resolved cases · TX venues · 2019–2026ranges, not promises ### Build one demand with it. Your next case. Compare it against your current process — specials, narrative, and priors, cited. [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=solutions-personal-injury)