# Premises Liability Record Review > Premises liability record review: the mechanism of injury in the first medical note, every treating visit, gap and pre-existing finding, all page-cited. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/premises-liability-record-review/ --- New — **Missing Records Detection:** flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) › — Premises Liability Record Review PREMISES LIABILITY RECORD REVIEW ## The mechanism in the triage note and the one in the complaint have to match. Premises liability record review services put the mechanism of injury in the first medical note beside the one pled in the complaint, then chronicle every treating visit, gap and pre-existing finding with page citations. Whether the fall caused the diagnosis stays with your experts. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=premises-liability-record-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) Click any row → the source page it cites Fall chronology · Case #IME-4812 documented Adams, Timothy · incident file 342 pp / 2 packets received logged 11 duplicate pages removed free p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100% ### Walkway safety has published standards. So does the lien on the recovery. We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In premises cases both the liability standard and the settlement obligation are published documents, and the medical record is where they meet. The standard and the referee The rulebook - ASTM F1637 Standard Practice for Safe Walking Surfaces and ANSI/ASSP A1264.2, the published walkway standards the liability experts work from and that the described mechanism has to be consistent with - The forum state’s comparative fault statute, which apportions recovery and makes the treating record the place where causation and contribution are both argued - 42 U.S.C. §1395y(b) and 42 CFR Part 411 Subpart B, the Medicare Secondary Payer rules under which injury-related treatment has to be separated from unrelated care before a settlement closes - Fed. R. Evid. 702 as amended in December 2023, under which a causation opinion connecting the fall to the diagnosis has to be reliably applied to this record The referee - The defense medical examiner, whose report will name every pre-existing finding and every gap the treating record contains - The trial court at summary judgment, which asks whether the medical record supports the mechanism of injury the complaint pleads - The Benefits Coordination & Recovery Center on conditional payments, which prices its demand from the diagnosis codes in the treatment record A triage note that describes a different fall than the complaint does From 10¢ to as low as 5¢/page here, duplicates free Fall chronology · Case #IME-4812 cited 100% Packet — 342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicated — logged Mechanism as first recorded — Carried verbatim from the triage or EMS note — cited Mechanism conflicts — Where later notes describe it differently — flagged Pre-existing findings — Prior complaints and imaging, same body part — flagged Chronology delivered · cited 100% · no causation opinion How it works ### 3 steps between the incident file and the chronology. 01 #### Send the incident file The EMS run sheet, ED records, every treating chart, imaging reports, prior records, and the incident report if you have it, in any format. 02 #### We return the chronology, page-cited The mechanism as each provider recorded it, the treatment course, every gap with its dates, and every prior finding on the same body part. 03 #### You argue causation Whether the surface caused the fall and the fall caused the diagnosis is expert territory. The chronology is the record both experts will be cross-examined on. The boundary, in writing ### A chronology of what the providers recorded, not a theory of the fall. We carry the mechanism verbatim from each note and flag where the accounts differ. We do not decide which version is right, opine on the walking surface, apportion fault, or value the claim. Those belong to your liability and medical experts. In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. In a premises file that error can attach a prior injury to the wrong person, so it is quarantined rather than folded quietly into the history. Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable 08:12 — Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packets — system 08:31 — 11 pages deduplicated — system 08:44 — p.140 flagged — wrong patient — system 08:54 — Fall chronology complete · chronology delivered · conflicts flagged · cited 100% — system 09:20 — Fall chronology reviewed · citations verified — reviewer 09:26 — Fall chronology exported · demand package assembled by counsel — reviewer Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery Why Medrecords AI ### The rules the platform never breaks. EVERY LINE CITED CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T. 342 pp 2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4 4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61 p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Medrecords AI Read every page · cite every line #### HIPAA, under a signed BAA Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte. #### Never trains a model Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's. #### Every line cited If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page. #### Deleted after delivery Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access. Powered by the platform ### 7 capabilities behind every fall chronology. The fall chronology is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record. [ #### Medical Records OCR Every page read in full, including the triage note where the mechanism is recorded before anyone has a theory. IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets → 27 documents, read in full ](https://medrecords.ai/product/ocr/) [ #### Medical Chronology Treatment assembles itself from dates across providers, so a changed account of the fall shows as a sequence rather than as an impression. IN ACTION · first presentation → current treatment, one continuous timeline ](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) [ #### Verifiable AI Citations Every entry links back to its page, including the version of the mechanism you would rather not see. IN ACTION · chronology → cited 100% ](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/) [ #### Medical Summary Reports It exports into your demand package or mediation brief in your format. IN ACTION · chronology → demand package ](https://medrecords.ai/product/summaries/) [ #### Medical Record Deduplication Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter. IN ACTION · 40 charts → duplicate visit notes collapsed to 1 record each ](https://medrecords.ai/product/medical-record-deduplication/) [ #### Missing Records Identification A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board. IN ACTION · prescribing pattern cross-checked → gaps flagged before submission ](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) [ #### Cross-Exam Simulator (beta) A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This beta tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice. IN ACTION · prescribing pattern → likely hearing questions mapped (beta) ](https://medrecords.ai/product/cross-exam-simulator/) FAQ ### Premises liability record review, answered. Each version is quoted with its page and timestamp and the conflict is flagged in its own state. We do not pick one or reconcile them. It is usually the most consequential fact in the file, and it belongs in front of counsel rather than smoothed over. No. ASTM F1637 and A1264.2 are the liability expert’s ground, not ours. We report what the medical record says about how the person fell and what happened to them, so the liability expert has an accurate mechanism to work from. Prior complaints and prior imaging on the same body part are flagged with dates and pages, whether or not they help. The defense examiner will find them, so the useful version is the one you already have with citations attached. No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes. ### Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read. No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=premises-liability-record-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [See every case type we process →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/case-types/) ### More solutions - [**The medical record holds the one fact the incident report has to survive.** — Police use-of-force record review: the first medical contact and its documented mechanism, imaging, photographs…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/police-use-of-force-record-review/) - [**The mild TBI case is won or lost in the first 72 hours of the chart.** — TBI record review for litigation: acute findings, imaging, neuropsychological testing and symptom course, set…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/traumatic-brain-injury-record-review/) - [**The N-648 is denied on the nexus sentence, not on the diagnosis.** — N-648 record review: the diagnosis, the twelve-month duration and every clinical finding bearing on the…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/immigration-disability-waiver-record-review/) - [**The opinion is the doctor’s. The record under it should be complete.** — Record foundations for treating-physician and expert causation disclosures: the cited chronology behind a Rule…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/treating-physician-causation-foundation/) - [**The order defines the scope. The packet should respect it.** — Record packets for Rule 35 defense medical examinations: the file condensed to the conditions in controversy…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/defense-medical-examination-record-review/) - [**The order, the MAR line and the pharmacy record have to say the same dose.** — Medication error record review: the order, the pharmacy verification, the MAR line and the resulting labs and…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medication-error-record-review/)