# Trucking Accident Record Review > Trucking accident record review: the plaintiff injury chronology and the driver medical qualification history under 49 CFR Part 391, both page-cited. Canonical page: https://medrecords.ai/solutions/trucking-accident-record-review/ --- New — **Missing Records Detection:** flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. [See how →](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) [Home](https://medrecords.ai/) ›[Solutions](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/) › — Trucking Accident Record Review TRUCKING ACCIDENT RECORD REVIEW ## Two medical files decide the trucking case. Most reviews read one. Trucking accident record review services build two cited timelines from one case: the plaintiff’s injury course from the scene through every treating provider, and the driver’s medical qualification history under Part 391, with each entry linked to its page. Fitness and causation opinions stay with your experts. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=trucking-accident-record-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) Click any row → the source page it cites Trucking chronology · Case #IME-4812 documented Adams, Timothy · crash and driver file 342 pp / 2 packets received logged 11 duplicate pages removed free p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100% ### The driver’s medical fitness runs on a federal rulebook, not on judgment. We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In trucking litigation, the driver’s side of the file is governed by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations outright. The standard and the referee The rulebook - 49 CFR Part 391 Subpart E, §§391.41 through 391.49, the physical qualification standards a commercial driver has to meet and the medical examination report that documents them - The FMCSA Medical Examiner Handbook and the National Registry of Certified Medical Examiners, which govern who may certify a driver and what the examination has to cover - 49 CFR Part 382, the controlled substances and alcohol testing rules, and the FMCSA Drug and Alcohol Clearinghouse record that accompanies them - Fed. R. Evid. 702 as amended in December 2023, under which opinions on injury causation and on the driver’s fitness both have to be reliably applied to this record The referee - The certified medical examiner on the National Registry, whose examination report and certificate the driver qualification file either contains or does not - FMCSA on the carrier’s driver qualification file, where a missing, expired or improperly issued certificate is a recorded violation rather than an argument - The trial court on negligent hiring, qualification and retention, which reads the driver’s medical file against Part 391 before the injury evidence is reached A driver qualification file nobody read until the deposition From 10¢ to as low as 5¢/page here, duplicates free Trucking chronology · Case #IME-4812 cited 100% Packet — 342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicated — logged Plaintiff injury course — Scene through current treatment — cited Driver certification history — Every exam, certificate and expiry date — cited Part 391 disqualifying findings — Where the exam record shows one — flagged Two chronologies delivered · cited 100% · no fitness opinion How it works ### 3 steps between the two files and the chronologies. 01 #### Send both files The plaintiff’s medical records and the driver qualification file: medical examination reports, certificates, the Clearinghouse query, and any post-accident testing, in any format. 02 #### We return two chronologies, page-cited The plaintiff’s treatment from the scene forward, and the driver’s certification history with every examination, finding, certificate and expiry date placed on one line. 03 #### Your experts take it from there Whether the driver should have been certified, and whether the crash caused the injury, are both expert questions. The chronologies are what those opinions get built on. The boundary, in writing ### Two chronologies of the record, not an opinion that the driver was unfit. We assemble and cite what the examination reports, certificates and treating charts say. We do not opine that a driver was medically unqualified, that a certificate was improperly issued, or that unfitness caused the collision. Those are opinions for a qualified examiner and your retained experts. In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. In a two-file trucking case that error can move a finding from the driver onto the plaintiff, so it is quarantined rather than reconciled quietly. Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable 08:12 — Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packets — system 08:31 — 11 pages deduplicated — system 08:44 — p.140 flagged — wrong patient — system 08:54 — Trucking chronology complete · two chronologies delivered · cited 100% — system 09:20 — Trucking chronology reviewed · citations verified — reviewer 09:26 — Trucking chronology exported · deposition outline assembled by counsel — reviewer Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery Why Medrecords AI ### The rules the platform never breaks. EVERY LINE CITED CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T. 342 pp 2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4 4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61 p.140 — wrong patient quarantined Medrecords AI Read every page · cite every line #### HIPAA, under a signed BAA Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte. #### Never trains a model Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's. #### Every line cited If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page. #### Deleted after delivery Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access. Powered by the platform ### 7 capabilities behind every trucking chronology. The trucking chronology is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record. [ #### Medical Records OCR Every page read in full, including the medical examination reports most reviews never open. IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets → 27 documents, read in full ](https://medrecords.ai/product/ocr/) [ #### Medical Chronology Both timelines assemble from their own dates, so the driver’s certification history reads against the crash date on its own line. IN ACTION · certification history → crash date, one timeline ](https://medrecords.ai/product/chronology/) [ #### Verifiable AI Citations Every entry links back to its page, on both sides of the file. IN ACTION · both chronologies → cited 100% ](https://medrecords.ai/product/citations/) [ #### Medical Summary Reports It exports into your deposition outline or expert packet in your format. IN ACTION · chronology → expert packet ](https://medrecords.ai/product/summaries/) [ #### Medical Record Deduplication Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter. IN ACTION · 40 charts → duplicate visit notes collapsed to 1 record each ](https://medrecords.ai/product/medical-record-deduplication/) [ #### Missing Records Identification A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board. IN ACTION · prescribing pattern cross-checked → gaps flagged before submission ](https://medrecords.ai/product/missing-records-identification/) [ #### Cross-Exam Simulator (beta) A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This beta tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice. IN ACTION · prescribing pattern → likely hearing questions mapped (beta) ](https://medrecords.ai/product/cross-exam-simulator/) FAQ ### Trucking accident record review, answered. No. We lay out every examination finding beside the §391.41 standard it bears on, with pages, so the question is answerable. Whether the certificate should have issued is an opinion for a certified medical examiner or your retained expert. A DOT certification review reads one driver’s file against the standard, usually for a carrier or an examiner. This reads two files in one case: the plaintiff’s injury chronology and the driver’s certification history, built to be argued against each other. The gap is flagged with the date range it covers. A missing or expired certificate is a fact about the file rather than an inference, and under Part 391 it is the carrier’s obligation, so it is reported as an absence rather than filled in. No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes. ### Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read. No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so. [Test a file ](https://medrecords.ai/test-a-file/?src=trucking-accident-record-review) [Book a demo](https://medrecords.ai/demo/) [See every case type we process →](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/case-types/) ### More solutions - [**Underwrite the case on the record, not the pitch.** — Underwrite case funding on the cited medical record, not the pitch. Built for pre-settlement and case funding…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/litigation-funders/) - [**Walk in having actually read the file.** — The most repeated criticism in IME-network reviews is that the evaluator didn't read the file. Walk in having…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/doctor-didnt-read-my-file/) - [**Walk into every exam knowing the whole record.** — Referral packets organized, deduplicated, and cited before you open them. Built for IME and QME physicians paid…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/medical-evaluators/) - [**Walk into the hearing with the record already organized.** — Turn years of medical records into a cited chronology before the ALJ hearing. Built for SSDI/SSI…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/disability-representatives/) - [**What the application said, what the record shows, and what the manual would have done.** — Record review for contestable life claims and rescission analysis. Application-versus-record reconciliation and…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/contestable-claim-record-review/) - [**Without the affidavit, the complaint is not docketed at all.** — Page-cited record review for Delaware affidavits of merit under 18 Del. C. §6853 — the file read in full before…](https://medrecords.ai/solutions/delaware-certificate-of-merit/)