Read the DICOM imaging — not just the radiology report.
"The report is one reader's summary. The study is the evidence."
Ingest full MRI, CT, and X-ray studies as native DICOM, view them in a built-in PACS viewer with 3D reconstruction, and see every imaging event placed directly on the case timeline — a capability no other tool in the category has.
From disc to timeline.
PipelineMRI, CT, X-ray — DICOM folders, ZIPs, or discs.
Sagittal, axial, localizer — organized on upload, no technician.
PACS viewer in the browser, 3D reconstruction, measurements.
Imaging events placed inline with the clinical record.
The wedge nobody else has.
MRI, CT, and X-ray studies load as first-class evidence — not as a one-page report summary. Folders, discs, and ZIPs all work.
Studies and series are identified on upload — sagittal, axial, localizer — and organized without a technician.
An OHIF-based viewer in the browser — scroll slices, compare series, window and measure. No radiology workstation, no install.
Volume rendering for the anatomy under dispute — the herniation, the fracture, the impingement — from any series.
Citations resolve to study → series → slice, and flow into chronologies, answers, and reports exactly like a page number.
Imaging events sit inline in the chronology, so the MRI sits next to the visit that ordered it — and the story reads whole.
The imaging spec sheet.
Imaging Intelligence™Full studies as native DICOM — not report PDFs or screenshots.
Studies and series detected automatically on upload.
In the browser — scroll, window, measure, compare series. No install.
The disputed anatomy, rendered — for review and demonstratives.
Cite imaging with the same precision as a page number.
Every study appears as an event in the chronology, next to the visit that ordered it.
Where the imaging decides the case.
When the dispute is what the film actually shows, quoting the report isn't enough.
The herniation dispute is settled by the study, not the summary.
For PI firmsWhat the film showed vs. what the report said — side by side, dated.
For med-malEvaluators see the imaging before the exam — not just the packet.
For IME orgsCheck the finding yourself and cite the slice in your opinion.
For evaluatorsDICOM & medical imaging review, answered.
No. An OHIF-based PACS viewer is built into the platform and runs in the browser — scroll slices, compare series, window and measure. No radiology workstation, no local install, no per-seat viewer license.
MRI, CT, and X-ray studies as native DICOM. Upload folders, disc images, or ZIPs; studies and series are detected and organized automatically alongside the paper record.
Yes. Citations resolve to study → series → slice and behave exactly like page citations — they appear in the chronology, in Q&A answers, and carry into report drafts, where the click-through opens the viewer at that slice.
As first-class events placed inline on the timeline, next to the visit that ordered them. Click an imaging event and the study opens in the viewer — the MRI is part of the story, not an attachment.
The report is one reader’s summary; the study is the evidence. When the dispute turns on what the film actually shows, your expert can check the finding — and cite the slice — instead of quoting someone else’s interpretation.
Volume rendering rebuilds the anatomy under dispute — a herniation, a fracture, an impingement — from any DICOM series. Reviewers use it to orient quickly; litigators use it as the basis for demonstratives.
Bring the imaging into evidence.
Bring a disc from a live case to the demo and watch it land on the timeline. Handled under our BAA; never used to train a model.