HomeSolutionsMedical Malpractice
Medical record review for med mal

Reconstruct the clinical timeline, hour by hour.

Standard of care turns on sequence: what was known, when, and what happened next. Medrecords rebuilds the record in strict order, every event cited to its page.

Expert packet · Ochoa chart expert-ready
21:04 — Lactate orderedp.641
21:52 — Result 4.1 — flagged, unsignedp.643
23:30 — No intervention documentedgap
01:12 — Rapid response calledp.702
Sequence merged across 3 charts, strict ordercited
Better opinions, faster — at lower review cost
The status quo

Med mal hinges on a precise sequence buried across charts, labs, and notes from a dozen providers. Rebuilt by hand, the hour that decides breach or causation is easy to misplace.

2,000+
pages across a dozen providers
30+ hrs
of manual review per file
1 hour
misplaced in the sequence decides breach

Get the clinical timeline — without assembling it yourself.

Everything you need to assess the case — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes the file, pulls the key medical facts, and builds summaries backed by citations, so your team works on strategy, not sorting.

Case summary · auto-drafted
p.12 p.47 p.118

Summaries: the whole case in one view

A complete, structured summary that surfaces delayed care, missing records, and conflicting narratives — every claim traced back to the page it came from.

Chronology · by date
Feb 11X-Ray — Chest
Apr 02Progress Note
May 22MRI — Cervical imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Consultation Report

Automated chronology: every event in order

Every page placed by date, provider, and event — with imaging inline and gaps flagged. Scroll the case instead of hunting through PDFs.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Indexing & dedup: a clean, searchable file

Medrecords detects duplicates, flags mismatches, and separates unrelated claimants — so the file you build on is one you can search, filter, and trust.

Cross-checked · multi-modelCase #12345
Patient nameJane Doe
Date of birth1985-04-15
DiagnosisRight arm fracture
Diagnosis codeS42.301A
Surgery date2024-10-07

Built to be verified — not just believed

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged — so your verification is a click, not a re-read.

Adapts to each claim

Built for standard-of-care analysis.

Who knew what, when — established from the record itself, cited to the page, and ready for your experts.

Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847
PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged 1 DICOM study
Organized recordby provider · date
01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Billing Statements
03Aug 06Physician Notes
612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

The sequence of care, established

Orders, results, notes, and interventions in strict time order — the foundation for breach and causation analysis, built from the record itself.

Expert-ready packets

Hand your experts a structured, cited chronology instead of a records dump — better opinions, faster, at lower review cost.

Who this is for

Breach lives in a four-hour window across three charts.

Med mal is decided on sequence — what was ordered, resulted, and acted on, hour by hour. Medrecords reconstructs that sequence from the full record and cites every step of it.

Orders, results, and interventions in strict time order
Cross-provider events merged into one timeline
Expert-ready packets with page-level citations
Expert packet · Ochoa chart expert-ready
Strict-order sequence — orders, results, notesp.641
Page-level citations on every stepp.643
Standard-of-care questions marked for the expertgap
Verifiable against the source chart, line by linep.702
Better opinions, faster — at lower review cost
The objection

"Can experts rely on this?"

The expert packet is built for reliance: a strict-order sequence, page-level citations on every step, each one verifiable against the source chart. Your expert argues from the record — faster, and at lower review cost.

Reconstruct one case.

Send the chart. Get the timeline your expert argues from.