NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
Home›Solutions›Medical Evaluators

We draft 90% of the medical chronology for IME and QME physicians.

Drafted into your IME or QME report. You verify and sign.

By Ahmed Jemaa, Co-Founder & CEO of Medrecords AI · Published 8 Jul 2026 · Updated 14 Sep 2026

Referral packets arrive organized, deduplicated, and cited before you open them: priors, treatment, imaging, and gaps in one sourced chronology, sorted by provider, date, and document type. Your hours go to the evaluation and the opinion. 2,000 pages come back in about 20 minutes, drafted into your IME or QME report: you verify and sign.

2,000 pages in 20 minutesHIPAASOC 2
IME report draftfor IME and QME physicians
exam-ready
1,412 pp → 9 providers, sorted & deduplicated
Prior lumbar injury, 2019 — surfaced to topp.1,847
History cross-checked — priors, treatment, imagingcited
Sorted by provider, date, and document type9 providers
EMG vs. progress note — diagnostic conflictp.212 · p.388
Record
1,847 pp, indexed
History
cited to page
Opinion
yours to give
The page 1,847 problem, solved before the exam
The status quo

Evaluators inherit referrals thousands of pages deep, days before the exam. Sorting by hand eats the hours that should go to clinical judgment. And it's where the contradiction goes unnoticed until cross.

2–4 hrs
of chart review per referral
1,412 pp
in a typical packet
1
missed prior is all cross needs

Open a referral that's already organized.

Everything the exam needs — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes the referral, builds the chronology, and drafts the history with citations, so your time goes to the evaluation and the opinion.

IME report · from your templateQME-104
p.31 p.212 p.640

Custom reports: your letterhead, your voice

Report templates draft the history and records review with inline citations. You add the findings and the opinion. Export clean, in your format, every time.

Chronology · by date
2019Prior injury · lumbar strain, pre-DOI
Feb 11Date of injury — ER visit
May 22MRI — Lumbar imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Orthopedic consultation

Automated chronology: the history in order

Prior injuries, treatment, imaging, and gaps — every event dated, sourced, and in sequence. The whole medical history scannable before the claimant walks in.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Dedup & indexing: shrink the packet first

Referral packets arrive bloated with duplicates and misfiled pages. Medrecords removes the redundancy and indexes what remains — so you read each page once.

Cross-checked · multi-modelReferral #M-2210
Claimant nameJane Doe✓
Date of injury2024-02-11✓
DiagnosisLumbar disc herniation✓
Prior injury2019 lumbar strain✓
Treatment to datePT ×12 · ESI ×2✓

Built to be verified — not just believed

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged, so your verification is a click, not a re-read.

Adapts to each referral

Built for expert-level decisions.

Contradictions, diagnostic inconsistencies, prior injuries: surfaced with citations, scored for confidence, and left for you to weigh. The judgment stays yours.

See the full IME workflow, capability by capability →
Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847
PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged One DICOM study
Organized recordby provider · date
01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Imaging Reports
03Aug 06Physician Notes
612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

Surface the clinical details that change opinions

Contradictions across providers, diagnostic inconsistencies, and key clinical events — highlighted on the timeline and cited to the page, so you analyze instead of search.

You make the calls — always

AI does the reading, every line stays reviewable and traceable, and verification is 1 click to the source. The findings and the opinion remain yours. As they should.

Who this is for

You're the expert. Reading shouldn't be the job.

IMEs, QMEs, and peer reviewers are paid for judgment — not for finding page 863. Medrecords surfaces the clinical details that change opinions, cites each one, and leaves the conclusions to you.

Contradictions and diagnostic inconsistencies highlighted with sources
Records oriented by provider, facility, and date at a glance
More files per week, with the same clinical rigor
Records review · file 3 of 9 today panel-ready
Dx: cervical radiculopathy — progress notep.212
EMG negative — 6 weeks laterconflict · p.388
Prior claim, same body part — 2021p.63
ROM measurements — all visits, comparedtable
Contradictions found for you — conclusions stay yours
The objection

"Does AI-assisted review weaken my opinion in deposition?"

It strengthens it. Every fact is cited to its page, so you verify in seconds and attest having actually read the full record — the 1 claim opposing counsel can't make about a skimmed packet. The conclusions were never the machine's to draw.

45 min of prep per referral — down from an evening

"I walk in having actually read the whole record. That was never true before — nobody reads 1,400 pages the night before an exam."

QME · orthopedic surgery, California
Who we serve

One platform. Built for everyone who works the file.

The same defensible, cited record, shaped to how each team reads it: the case, the claim, or the exam.

Roles
Plaintiff AttorneysProve the injury, dollar by dollar Defense CounselSurface the case-deciding fact Legal Nurse ConsultantsChronologies in a fraction of the time IME & QME PhysiciansYOU ARE HEREDefensible IME opinions, faster Medical Expert WitnessesCited opinions, not paper chases Claims Adjusters & ExaminersTriage and settle sooner Forensic EvaluatorsYour report format, fully cited Medical Examiners & CoronersThe history before the certification Life Care Planners & Vocational ExpertsCost projections built on the full record VA-Accredited RepresentativesThe whole C-file before you file C&P ExaminersC-files, exam-ready on time Social Security Disability RepresentativesYears of records, 1 hearing
Organizations
Insurance CarriersScale review across every claim Law FirmsLitigation-ready case files TPAs & Case ManagementStandardize across clients Government & Public SectorCompliant, auditable records IME Companies & NetworksOne pipeline, every physician Self-InsurersClaims reviewed like a carrier would Disability InsurersLTD/STD files, cited every cycle Settlement AdministratorsTier claims at MDL scale VA C&P Exam ContractorsC-files, exam-ready on time Hospital Risk ManagementKnow the chart before counsel does Litigation FundersUnderwrite the file, not the pitch Medical Funders & Lien NetworksFund the treatment, verify the file
Use Cases
Social Security DisabilityTimeline ready before the hearing Personal Injury PlaintiffCited evidence on demand Personal Injury DefenseVerify specials, flag the gaps Veteran DisabilityTimeline built before the exam Workers' CompensationTrack treatment and gaps Mass TortQualify claimants at scale Medical MalpracticeReconstruct the timeline Auto Bodily Injury ClaimsSpecials and causation, cited
Not sure which fits? Talk to us about Enterprise
CONTENT HUB

The Content Hub lists examiner requirements for 10 states, telehealth-versus-in-person rules, and an evidence-based primer on malingering and symptom validity. Free, no login.

Check your state's rules

Send us your next referral packet.

Read the output before your exam. Then decide.

Medical record review for IME physicians, at a glance

Medrecords AI takes the referral packet an IME or QME physician already holds and returns a dated chronology, a summary and a missing-records list, with every line linked to its source page. It reads scans, handwriting and native DICOM imaging. Self-Service pricing starts at 10 cents per deduplicated page, with no subscription.

Does Medrecords AI write the IME opinion?

No. It drafts the record history: chronology, summary, prior-condition and gap findings, each cited to the page it came from. Causation, apportionment, impairment and the final opinion stay with the examining physician. The software drafts and cites; you review, you revise, you sign.

What does it cost for a solo or small IME practice?

Self-Service starts at 10 cents per deduplicated page and scales down to as low as 5 cents with volume. Exact duplicate pages are never billed, there is no subscription, no seats and no setup fee, and credits do not expire. A 1,847-page file with duplicates removed bills $184.70.

Can it read the imaging, not just the radiology report?

Yes. It ingests DICOM studies directly, with an integrated viewer, and flags findings to the page or slice alongside the notes, so the physician can check an image against the report without opening a second system.

Does it retrieve records from providers?

No. Medrecords AI analyzes records you already have; it does not request or retrieve records from providers, facilities or claimants. Upload the packet the referral source sent and the review starts in minutes.

Ranked lists