HomeSolutionsLaw Firms
Medical record review for law firms

Every matter worked like your best people touched it.

Records sorted, chronologies built, and facts cited before an associate bills an hour to sorting. The senior treatment, on every case in the building.

Matter dashboard · the firm firm-level
14 active matters · records status live
3 chronologies ready for attorney reviewready
Ochoa — 2,412 pp organized, cited, day oneintake Mon
Doe v. Acme — review transferred mid-case, cleanre-staffed
Rivera — records requested, 2 providers pendingtracked
No matter waits on sorting
The status quo

Every matter starts the same way: someone spends billable weeks sorting records. It's expensive, inconsistent across teams, and the case-deciding fact is easy to miss on page 1,800.

3 wks
of sorting starts every matter
at a loss
how paralegal review hours realize
the backlog
decides which cases get worked

Get the defensible blueprint — without assembling it yourself.

Everything you need to assess the case — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes the file, pulls the key medical facts, and builds summaries backed by citations, so your team works on strategy, not sorting.

Case summary · auto-drafted
p.12 p.47 p.118

Summaries: the whole case in one view

A complete, structured summary that surfaces delayed care, missing records, and conflicting narratives — every claim traced back to the page it came from.

Chronology · by date
Feb 11X-Ray — Chest
Apr 02Progress Note
May 22MRI — Cervical imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Consultation Report

Automated chronology: every event in order

Every page placed by date, provider, and event — with imaging inline and gaps flagged. Scroll the case instead of hunting through PDFs.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Indexing & dedup: a clean, searchable file

Medrecords detects duplicates, flags mismatches, and separates unrelated claimants — so the file you build on is one you can search, filter, and trust.

Cross-checked · multi-modelCase #12345
Patient nameJane Doe
Date of birth1985-04-15
DiagnosisRight arm fracture
Diagnosis codeS42.301A
Surgery date2024-10-07

Built to be verified — not just believed

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged — so your verification is a click, not a re-read.

Adapts to each claim

Built for the whole firm.

One platform, one standard — from intake to deposition prep. Every matter gets the same defensible file, whoever staffs it.

Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847
PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged 1 DICOM study
Organized recordby provider · date
01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Billing Statements
03Aug 06Physician Notes
612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

One standard across every matter

Same structure, same citations, same quality — on the two-binder file and the forty-box one. Reviews transfer cleanly between teams mid-case.

Move associates from sorting to strategy

The organizing is done before the file hits a desk. Your people spend their hours on arguments, depositions, and demands — the work clients pay for.

Who this is for

Every new matter starts with three weeks of sorting.

Multiply that across the docket and it's a full-time team doing work clients resent paying for. Medrecords makes the organized, cited file the starting point of every matter instead.

Matters staffed on strategy, not sorting
One defensible standard across teams and offices
Reviews that transfer cleanly when staffing changes
New matter intake · Mon 08:12 same day
Records in — 3 providers, 2,412 pages08:12
Organized, deduped, and cited09:40
Associate assigned — starts at strategy10:00
Chronology attached to motion draftEx. A
Billable hours where clients want them
The objection

"What does this do to our billing model?"

A straight answer: it converts low-realization review hours into high-value strategy hours — the work clients pay for without complaint. And per-page pricing means cost scales with the matter, not with headcount.

Pilot it on one practice group.

Thirty days, real matters, your own numbers.