IME Hub › Compare

California QME vs Texas Designated Doctor — State Program Comparison

California QMEs are chosen through a three-doctor panel with strikes; Texas designated doctors are appointed and trained by the Division — and Texas DD findings carry presumptive weight unless clearly rebutted.

1 section·3 sources·Verified 2026-08-15 ✓

What to compare

  • Selection mechanics: panel strikes (CA) vs state appointment (TX).
  • Rating framework: PDRS+AMA5 vs Texas RME rules.
  • Report standard: substantial medical evidence (CA) vs presumptive-weight DD report (TX).
  • Telehealth: Texas now allows MMI-by-telemedicine for minor injuries; California status unverified in this pass.

Key facts

Selection

CA: 3-QME panel + strike process. TX: state-appointed designated doctor

Rating standard

CA: AMA 5th + 2005 PDRS. TX: commissioner-adopted edition

Evidentiary weight

TX DD: presumptive weight. CA QME: substantial medical evidence standard

Forms

CA: QME-100/105. TX: DWC-32, Report of Medical Evaluation

Sources

Explore the IME Hub

MedRecords AIMedRecords AI

MedRecords AI is faster, better, cheaper.

Bring the hardest file from this page. Get a cited chronology and a report draft in minutes — every line traced to its source page, ready for your review and signature.

  • Minutes per file, not days
  • Every line cited to its source page
  • Flat 10¢/page, duplicates free — no license, no minimums
  • HIPAA-eligible · SOC 2 audit-ready
Test on a file Book a demo

See how MedRecords AI compares with anything on this page — over a 30-minute call, side by side.

Last verified: 2026-08-15