NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →

CoCounsel (Casetext) — Profile & Assessment

CoCounsel (Casetext) publishes 6 of the 8 buying facts this rubric checks, including pricing but not turnaround. This profile records what the company publishes about its services, maps those claims to the Content Hub evaluation rubric, and cites every source behind them. 15 of 17 facts are confirmed from 16 public sources; unpublished fields are marked, never estimated.

By Ahmed Jemaa, Co-Founder & CEO of Medrecords AI · Published 30 Aug 2026 · Updated 14 Sep 2026

4 sections·16 sources·Verified 2026-08-28 ✓
Disclosure
14/17 facts
01

What it does

CoCounsel is an AI legal assistant with a medical-chronology 'skill'/workflow among its litigation tools, alongside document review, deposition prep, contract analysis, and legal research (via CARA/Casetext search). Everything above is drawn from the 16 public sources cited at the foot of this page. Fields the company does not publish are marked as unpublished below rather than estimated.

Key facts

Segment

AI-native / Tech-enabled service

Website

casetext.com/cocounsel (also thomsonreuters.com/cocounsel)

Founded

Not published (Casetext founded by Jacob Heller and Pablo Arredondo, per Crunchbase; exact year Not published/obfuscated)

HQ

San Francisco, CA — exact street address Not published

Headcount

101–250 employees (pre-acquisition figure per Crunchbase; likely absorbed into Thomson Reuters headcount post-acquisition)

Ownership

Acquired by Thomson Reuters (deal price/date Not published this session — obfuscated on Crunchbase; widely reported in press at the time as a ~$650M acquisition, unverified live this session). Pre-acquisition Crunchbase shows 7 funding rounds, last a Series C; 26 total investors listed (incl. Bridge Investments, Cerity Partners Ventures).

Pricing

Not published (subscription/seat-based per Thomson Reuters enterprise legal-tech norms; exact figures Not published this session)

Certifications

Not published this session

Not publishedTurnaround

Medrecords AI vs CoCounsel (Casetext) at a glance

Same 8 rubric rows, side by side. Vendor cells repeat what CoCounsel (Casetext) publishes; a row it has not published stays that way. Medrecords AI cells are our own published terms.

Rubric rowMedrecords AICoCounsel (Casetext)
Processing modelAI drafts and cites; you review and sign. Every line cites its source page.100% AI (self-serve legal research/drafting assistant)
Human QAYours, not ours. Output is editable and every claim links to the page it came from.None disclosed
Typical turnaroundMinutes to hours per fileNot published
Pricing modelPay per page, no subscription (Self-Service); annual licence for Enterprise On-PremSubscription (per-user annual), bundled with Westlaw
Indicative costfrom 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page, duplicates freeCore from $4,500/user/year (requires separate Westlaw subscription)
Export formatsDOCX, PDF and HTML, hyperlinked back to every source page; API or SFTP deliveryNot published
Best forLaw firms, IME clinics, legal nurse consultants and small TPAsAm Law 100 firms and corporate legal departments needing AI legal research/drafting
Customer satisfactionWe publish no rating of our ownNo public reviews found

The boundary on our side does not move: the software drafts and cites; you review, you revise, you sign.

02

Evaluation criteria

Content Hub rubric7 of 8 published
✓
Processing model
100% AI (self-serve legal research/drafting assistant)
✓
Human QA
None disclosed
✓
Pricing model
Subscription (per-user annual), bundled with Westlaw
✓
Indicative cost
Core from $4,500/user/year (requires separate Westlaw subscription)
✓
Export formats
Users can download saved searches, research folders, annotations, and uploaded documents (no published fixed export-format spec)
✓
Best for
Am Law 100 firms and corporate legal departments needing AI legal research/drafting
✓
Customer satisfaction
No public reviews found
○
Not published
Typical turnaround goes unstated, as it does across most of this market. The questions to ask instead are below.
03

Profile notes

Who it serves
General litigation support including personal injury use cases via its medical chronology skill
Claims & platform notes
Built on large language models (GPT-4-class per public Thomson Reuters marketing at launch); specific current model and accuracy claims Not published this session (page fetch was blocked — PROXY_REJECTED/403) Not published this session
Review summary
Not independently rated by Medrecords AI. Cited public reviews are listed under Sources; Medrecords AI assigns no star rating without verified evidence.
Competitive coverage
Legal AI Tools in 2025: What Works and What Doesn't · Casefleet vs Supio (2026) · Casetext vs LexisNexis: CoCounsel vs Lexis+ AI · 12 Best Legal AI Tools to Improve Firm Productivity · Top AI Software for Personal Injury Practices (2026) · Top AI Tools for Personal Injury Attorneys in 2026 · Best AI Tools for Personal Injury Attorneys: A Guide (DUPLICATE of above) · Best Supio Alternatives: AI Tools for PI Demand Letters and Case Analysis · Top AI Software for Personal Injury Law Firms in 2026 · Supio Competitors: AI Demand-Letter and Case-Prep Platforms Compared Head-to-Head
04

What to confirm before you sign

CoCounsel (Casetext) publishes 7 of the 8 fields in the Content Hub rubric. Across the 10 AI-native / Tech-enabled service vendors profiled here, the median is 6 of 8.

    The other 9 questions, and what all 270 profiled vendors do and do not publish, are in the evaluation guide.

    Sources

    How Medrecords AI does this work

    CoCounsel works in medical-record review. Medrecords AI does this category of work as software: the record sorted, deduplicated and read in minutes, every statement cited back to its page, and you sign off on what it means.

    ProductMedical chronologyA dated, deduplicated timeline with a citation on every entry.Read more →ProductCitationsEvery statement links back to the page and line it came from.Read more →ProductNeutrality firewallRetained-side language kept out of the record read.Read more →
    Test it on a file you already have.
    Send one real record set. You get back a cited chronology and decide for yourself whether the read holds up — no obligation either way.
    Book a demoSee pricing

    Explore the Content Hub

    Software & platforms

    AI and case-management platforms across medical-record review.

    Service providers & BPOs

    Record review, peer review, retrieval, LNC and BPO providers.

    State programs

    Rules, AMA Guides edition, and MMI standards by state.

    Comparisons

    Head-to-head vendor and program comparisons.

    Guides

    Editorial reference on report writing, MMI, and validity testing.

    Conferences & events

    Workers' comp, claims, insurance and medical-legal conferences with editorial takes.

    Directories

    Rosters of examiners, LNCs, and expert witnesses by state.

    State matrix report

    All 10 verified state programs, side by side.

    Content Hub home

    The full index of everything in the hub.

    Medrecords AIMedrecords AI

    Minutes per file. Every line cited. From 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page.

    Bring the hardest file from this page. Get a cited chronology and a report draft in minutes — every line traced to its source page, ready for your review and signature.

    • Minutes per file, not days
    • Every line cited to its source page
    • From 10¢ to as low as 5¢/page, duplicates free — no license, no minimums
    • HIPAA-eligible · SOC 2
    See pricing Book a demo

    See how Medrecords AI compares with anything on this page — over a 30-minute call, side by side.

    Last verified: 2026-08-15