Source, timeline, and report. 1 screen.
Medical record review workspace software from Medrecords AI puts the source page, the timeline, and the report you're drafting on 1 screen, in 3 synced panes that stay in view together. Every fact you write sits 1 click from the page that proves it, so drafting and verifying never drift apart.
By Ahmed Jemaa, Co-Founder & CEO of Medrecords AI · Published 10 Jul 2026 · Updated 30 Aug 2026
3 panes, one underlying fact.
The source pane shows the actual record page or DICOM slice. The timeline pane holds the structured chronology of the whole file. The report pane is your draft. Click an event and the source jumps to its page; click a citation in the draft and the same happens — 3 angles on the same evidence.
Draft with the evidence beside you.
The report pane is a full rich-text editor with inline citations. Write the finding while the page that supports it sits next to your cursor — no printing the record, no quote-checking from memory, no losing your place in a 342-page file.
Built for the whole file, not a sample.
The timeline is filterable and searchable across every document in the packet; the source pane lazy-loads pages so 1,000-page file scrolls like a 10-page one. Search a term, filter to a provider, jump to the page — the layout holds at any size.
The citation is never more than 1 click away.
Audit-grade work isn't a final proofread — it's a layout where verification is the default motion. Because the source page is always in view, every line of the report gets checked against the record as it's written, which is what makes the output legally defensible later.
See Verifiable AI CitationsFrom upload to signed-off report.
3 steps, 1 screen the whole way.
The record is read, deduplicated, and placed on the timeline — the workspace opens ready to review.
Work the timeline, check the source, draft the report — every jump between them is 1 click.
The report leaves with its citations attached — your template, your letterhead, page-linked throughout.
Watch chronology, chat and narrative side by side
It opens on the Case Assistant in the demo case Rivera v. Coastline Freight. A new chat starts, the question "What work restrictions were given after the collision?" is typed in Clinical Synthesis mode, and the thread names itself after the question. A search trace then runs step by step: it loads the case overview, searches for "work restrictions", pulls records from Maple Ridge Orthopedics and checks documents around 03/14/2025, with a result count on each step. The trace folds into a "4 steps" pill and the answer arrives in 3 sentences, each with a numbered citation. The answer is selected, exported, and attached to the Record Review report as an appendix. The last scene shows the 3-pane workspace with the chronology, the assistant and the narrative side by side, a divider drag and the Layout menu. Every name, provider and date in the demo is invented.
Transcript
- Start a thread and ask the case in plain English.
- Watch each search step run, then read the cited answer.
- Select the answer and add it to a report.
- Chronology, assistant and narrative, side by side.
Who works in it.
Anyone whose day is a record on one monitor and a report on the other.
Exam findings drafted with the record's history one pane away.
For evaluatorsQuote the record with the page in view — no surprises at deposition.
For law firmsHigh file volume, 1 consistent review layout per examiner.
For TPAsAdjusters verify the medicals behind a reserve without leaving the screen.
For carriersThe review workspace, answered.
The source pane shows the actual record page or DICOM image; the timeline pane holds the structured chronology of the whole file; the report pane is the document you're drafting. All 3 stay on 1 screen, sized for real review work, and stay in sync as you move. The layout itself is configurable per case — split 3-pane by default, or a tabbed view when you'd rather work one pane at a time.
Click a timeline event and the source pane jumps to the exact page or imaging slice behind it. Click a citation in your draft and the same thing happens. Select a passage in the source and it's ready to cite into the report — the panes point at the same underlying fact from 3 angles.
That's the point of the layout. The report pane is a full rich-text editor with inline citations, so you write the finding while the page that supports it sits beside it — no tab-switching, no printing the record to check a quote.
Yes. The workspace is built for files in the hundreds or thousands of pages — the timeline is filterable and searchable, the source pane lazy-loads pages, and jumping from event to page is instant regardless of packet size.
Largely, yes. Chronology, record search, Q&A, and report drafting all surface in the same 3-pane screen, so one login and one layout cover the review from first upload to exported report.
Related capabilities
See your own file in 3 panes.
Upload a single file and review it in the workspace — timeline built, sources linked, report pane ready. Handled under our BAA; never used to train a model.