Consistency is graded on five words. The record has to carry the one you pick.
Asylum medical evaluation record review services organize the client’s medical and psychological history into a cited timeline before the forensic evaluation: every documented injury, treatment contact and mental health encounter, with dates and pages. The consistency finding stays with the evaluating clinician.
The Istanbul Protocol is the published method, and it names its own vocabulary.
We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. For forensic asylum evaluations the method is a UN manual and the referee is the officer or judge who weighs the affidavit against the declaration.
3 steps between the client file and the timeline.
Send the client file
Records from the country of origin, transit and US care, hospital and clinic notes, mental health records, photographs and any prior evaluation, in any format and any language you have them in.
We return the timeline, page-cited
Every documented injury and treatment contact in sequence, every mental health encounter, and the periods where no record exists, marked as gaps rather than filled.
The clinician evaluates
The examination, the consistency finding and the affidavit are the clinician’s, made on their own judgment under the Istanbul Protocol.
A timeline of the record, not a consistency finding.
We assemble and cite the documentary history the evaluation rests on. We do not examine the client, state that a finding is consistent with the alleged events, assess credibility, or sign an affidavit. Those are the evaluating clinician’s under the Istanbul Protocol.
In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. In an asylum file that error attaches another person’s injury to this client’s account, so it is quarantined rather than folded quietly into the history.
The rules the platform never breaks.
EVERY LINE CITED
HIPAA, under a signed BAA
Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.
Never trains a model
Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.
Every line cited
If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.
Deleted after delivery
Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.
7 capabilities behind every evaluation timeline.
The evaluation timeline is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.
Medical Records OCR
Every page read in full, including records from outside the US health system.
Medical Chronology
Scattered contacts across countries and years assemble from their own dates into one sequence.
Verifiable AI Citations
Every entry links back to its page, so the affidavit can cite the record rather than paraphrase it.
Medical Summary Reports
It exports into the clinician’s affidavit in their format.
Medical Record Deduplication
Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter.
Missing Records Identification
A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board.
Cross-Exam Simulator (beta)
A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This beta tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice.
Asylum medical evaluation record review, answered.
Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.
No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.