NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
Home›Solutions›Litigation Funders
Medical record review for litigation funders

Underwrite the case on the record, not the pitch.

Reviewing medical liens instead of case advances? See Medical Funders & Lien Networks.

Medical record review for pre-settlement and case funders — injury severity, treatment trajectory, and case value organized and cited before you price the advance.

Funding file · organizing review-ready
260 pp → 3 providers, sorted & deduplicated
Injury severity indicators — cited across treatment history
Treatment gap, 4 months — flagged for underwriting review
Built for the portfolio, not just the file.
The status quo
Burford Capital alone carries a $7.5B litigation portfolio
consumer pre-settlement funding: 200+ funders, $2.7B+ securitized since 2018
underwriting on a demand letter is underwriting on a summary, not the record

Open a referral that's already organized.

Everything the exam needs — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes the referral, builds the chronology, and drafts the history with citations, so your time goes to the evaluation and the opinion.

IME report · from your templateQME-104
p.31 p.212 p.640

Custom reports: your letterhead, your voice

Report templates draft the history and records review with inline citations. You add the findings and the opinion. Export clean, in your format, every time.

Chronology · by date
2019Prior injury · lumbar strain, pre-DOI
Feb 11Date of injury — ER visit
May 22MRI — Lumbar imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Orthopedic consultation

Automated chronology: the history in order

Prior injuries, treatment, imaging, and gaps — every event dated, sourced, and in sequence. The whole medical history scannable before the claimant walks in.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Dedup & indexing: shrink the packet first

Referral packets arrive bloated with duplicates and misfiled pages. Medrecords removes the redundancy and indexes what remains — so you read each page once.

Cross-checked · multi-modelReferral #M-2210
Claimant nameJane Doe✓
Date of injury2024-02-11✓
DiagnosisLumbar disc herniation✓
Prior injury2019 lumbar strain✓
Treatment to datePT ×12 · ESI ×2✓

Built to be verified — not just believed

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged, so your verification is a click, not a re-read.

Adapts to each referral

Built for expert-level decisions.

Contradictions, diagnostic inconsistencies, prior injuries: surfaced with citations, scored for confidence, and left for you to weigh. The judgment stays yours.

See the full IME workflow, capability by capability →
Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847
PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged One DICOM study
Organized recordby provider · date
01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Imaging Reports
03Aug 06Physician Notes
612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

Surface the clinical details that change opinions

Contradictions across providers, diagnostic inconsistencies, and key clinical events — highlighted on the timeline and cited to the page, so you analyze instead of search.

You make the calls — always

AI does the reading, every line stays reviewable and traceable, and verification is one click to the source. The findings and the opinion remain yours. As they should.

Who this is for

You're the expert. Reading shouldn't be the job.

Underwriters at pre-settlement and case funders pricing an advance against a case's likely value.

Contradictions and diagnostic inconsistencies highlighted with sources
Records oriented by provider, facility, and date at a glance
More files per week, with the same clinical rigor
Records review · file 3 of 9 today panel-ready
Dx: cervical radiculopathy — progress notep.212
EMG negative — 6 weeks laterconflict · p.388
Prior claim, same body part — 2021p.63
ROM measurements — all visits, comparedtable
Contradictions found for you — conclusions stay yours
The objection

“Doesn't this just tell us what the plaintiff's attorney already claims?”

No — it reads the underlying treatment record independently, so you're underwriting against the file, not the demand.

Built for the defensible underwrite.

Who we serve

One platform. Built for everyone who works the file.

The same defensible, cited record, shaped to how each team reads it: the case, the claim, or the exam.

Roles
IME PhysiciansDefensible IME opinions, faster Claims AdjustersTriage and settle sooner Defense LawyersSurface the case-deciding fact Legal Nurse ConsultantsChronologies in a fraction of the time Expert WitnessesCited opinions, not paper chases Life Care Planners & Vocational ExpertsCost projections built on the full record Social Security Disability RepresentativesYears of records, one hearing Forensic Psychological EvaluatorsYour report format, fully cited
Organizations
Insurance CarriersScale review across every claim Law FirmsLitigation-ready case files TPAs & Case ManagementStandardize across clients Government & Public SectorCompliant, auditable records IME Companies & NetworksOne pipeline, every physician Self-InsurersClaims reviewed like a carrier would Disability InsurersLTD/STD files, cited every cycle Settlement AdministratorsTier claims at MDL scale VA C&P Exam ContractorsC-files, exam-ready on time Hospital Risk ManagementKnow the chart before counsel does Litigation FundersYOU ARE HEREUnderwrite the file, not the pitch Medical Funders & Lien NetworksFund the treatment, verify the file
Use Cases
Social Security DisabilityTimeline ready before the hearing Personal Injury PlaintiffCited evidence on demand Personal Injury DefenseVerify specials, flag the gaps Veteran DisabilityTimeline built before the exam Workers' CompensationTrack treatment and gaps Mass TortQualify claimants at scale Medical MalpracticeReconstruct the timeline Auto Bodily Injury ClaimsSpecials and causation, cited
Not sure which fits? Talk to us about Enterprise
FAQ

Litigation Funders, answered.

Yes — prior conditions and treatment gaps are surfaced and cited, not just summarized.

Built for same-day on a typical file; turnaround scales with file size.

Ask about volume pricing for a funding desk reviewing files at scale.

CONTENT HUB

The Content Hub covers medical-legal record review across IME and QME, workers’ compensation, personal injury, disability and life underwriting, mass tort, and payer integrity. Free, no login.

Browse the Content Hub

Send your next funding file.

Read the cited summary. Then price it.