NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
Home›Solutions›Life Care Planners
Medical record review for life care planners

The foundation chronology for life care planners, cited to the page.

Medical record review for life care planners turns 5,000 to 30,000 pages of treatment into 1 page-cited foundation chronology: every documented future-care recommendation, equipment order, pending surgery and permanency statement, with provider, date and page. Medrecords AI drafts and cites. You review, you revise, you cost the plan and you sign it.

Self-Service starts at 10 cents a deduplicated page, down to 5 cents at volume. Duplicate pages are free. Enterprise On-Prem is an annual license, no per-seat fees. First case is free on us.

See the life care plan medical foundation sample before you book.

2,000 pages in 20 minutesHIPAASOC 2
Life care plan foundationfor life care planners
review-ready
342 pp → 2 packets, 11 duplicate pages removed
Future-care recommendations, verbatim, cited to the page
Recommended vs provided equipment, 1 table
Foundation
331 pages, cited
Visits since Apr 02
7, improving
Cost projections
yours to set
Built for the plan. You cost it.
The status quo
a life care plan rests on 5,000 to 30,000 pages nobody has time to read twice
1 missed surgical recommendation changes a 30-year projection
opposing counsel needs only 1 recommendation you did not cite

Open a record that is already organized.

Everything the plan rests on, structured and cited. Medrecords AI organizes the file, builds the foundation chronology and drafts the medical history with a page behind every line, so your time goes to the projection and the plan.

Life care plan · from your templateYour template
p.31 p.212 p.640

Custom reports: your plan template, your voice

The custom report builder drafts the medical history and treatment course into your own life care plan template with inline citations. You add the projection, the vendors and the costing. Export in your format, every time.

Chronology · by date
Feb 14ER visit, right knee · p.4
Apr 02Visit notes begin · 7 visits, improving
Apr 18Arthroscopic surgery p.61
p.140Wrong-patient page · quarantined
FutureRecommended, not yet provided · flagged

Foundation chronology: the history in order

Diagnoses, treatment course, functional limitations, pending surgeries and gaps: every event dated, cited and in sequence on the cited chronology. The whole record readable before you cost the plan.

Duplicate pages · 11Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Dedup and indexing: shrink the file first

Chart sets arrive bloated with duplicates and misfiled pages. Medrecords AI removes the duplicates, never bills them, and indexes what remains, so you read each page once.

Cross-checked · multi-modelCase #IME-4812
Claimant nameAdams, Timothy✓
ER visit, right kneeFeb 14 · p.4✓
SurgeryApr 18 arthroscopic · p.61✓
Duplicates11 pages, not billed✓
Wrong-patient pagep.140 · quarantined✓

Built to be verified, line by line

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged as signals for your review, so verification is a click, not a re-read.

Projection inputs

Every projection input, cited before you cost it.

Therapy frequency and duration, medications, equipment recommended and equipment provided, surgeries recommended but not done, permanency statements: each one pulled with provider, date and page, and left for you to weigh and cost. The future-care tables hold documented recommendations only, never an estimate.

See life care plan drafting, capability by capability →
Intake · Case #IME-4812 reading · p. 288 / 342
PDF packet_1 · PDF DOC packet_2 · PDF JPG p.140 · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
342 pp in 331 unique 1 flagged 2 packets
Organized recordby provider · date
01Feb 14Emergency records
02Apr 02Visit notes
03Apr 18Operative report
331 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

Surface what changes a projection

A surgery recommended twice and never scheduled, a wheelchair ordered but not delivered, a permanency statement buried in a progress note: highlighted on the timeline and cited to the page, so you cost instead of search.

You cost the plan, always

Medrecords AI does the reading, every line stays reviewable and traceable, and verification is 1 click to the source. The projection, the vendor pricing and the plan remain yours. Medrecords AI never costs the plan.

Who this is for

You are the planner. Reading 20,000 pages is not the job.

CLCP and CNLCP certified life care planners building future-care projections from the complete medical record, on the plaintiff side or the defense side.

Every documented recommendation with provider, date, frequency, duration and page
Recommended vs provided equipment and pending surgeries in their own tables
What the record does not establish, listed so you can request it
Foundation chronology · Case #IME-4812 review-ready
ER visit, right kneep.4
Arthroscopic surgery, right kneep.61
Wrong-patient pagep.140 · flagged
Recommended vs provided equipmenttable
Recommendations found for you. The projection stays yours.
The objection

“Will this miss the 1 recommendation that changes a 30-year projection?”

It is built to surface exactly that. Every recommendation is pulled verbatim with its page, low-confidence pulls are flagged for your review, and the missing-records list names the gaps so you know what the record does not establish.

Built for the defensible projection.

Who we serve

One platform. Built for everyone who works the file.

The same defensible, cited record, shaped to how each team reads it: the case, the claim, or the exam.

Not sure which fits? Talk to us about Enterprise
FAQ

Life care planners, answered.

Self-Service starts at 10 cents a deduplicated page, down to 5 cents at volume. Duplicate pages are free. Enterprise On-Prem is an annual license, no per-seat fees. First case is free on us. Self-Service access starts within 1 business day of the demo. A 10,000-page file at 10 cents a page is $1,000 before volume pricing, and the duplicate pages in it cost nothing.

No. Medrecords AI organizes, cites and flags what is in the records you upload. It drafts the foundation chronology and the future-care tables from documented recommendations only. Vendor pricing, frequency assumptions, life expectancy and the projection are yours. You review, you revise, you sign.

Verbatim. Each recommendation is pulled with the provider, the date, the frequency and duration where stated, and the page it sits on. Equipment appears in 2 columns, recommended and provided, and surgeries recommended but not performed carry their own row, so nothing recommended gets lost in a 20,000-page file.

The missing-records list names the referrals, follow-ups and imaging the file mentions but does not contain, with the page that mentions them. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers. You use the list to request what is missing before the plan goes out.

Yes. Medrecords AI is SOC 2 audited and HIPAA compliant, and every file is handled under a signed Business Associate Agreement. Your records never train a model. Retention is configurable and deletion is on request, with an audit log of every access. Details on security and HIPAA.

Vocational experts have their own page at medical record review for vocational experts, built around work capacity, restrictions and functional findings pulled from the record. This page covers life care planners.

Yes. The custom report builder drafts the history into your existing life care plan template, with the citations kept, and exports in your format. Self-Service access starts within 1 business day of the demo.

CONTENT HUB

The Content Hub covers medical-legal record review across IME and QME, workers’ compensation, personal injury, disability and life underwriting, mass tort, and payer integrity. Free, no login.

Browse the Content Hub

Send your next catastrophic file.

Read the cited foundation chronology. Then cost the plan.

Field guides

Ranked lists