NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
Home›Solutions›Social Security Disability Representatives

We draft 90% of the medical chronology for SSDI and SSI representatives.

Drafted into your hearing brief. You verify and file.

Years of medical records become a cited chronology before the ALJ hearing, so the case for disability rests on the full file rather than what fit in the review window. 2,000 pages come back in about 20 minutes, drafted into your hearing brief: you verify and file.

2,000 pages in 20 minutesHIPAASOC 2
Hearing filefor SSDI and SSI representatives
review-ready
980 pp → 6 providers, sorted & deduplicated
Onset-to-present timeline — cited across treatment history
Listing-relevant findings — cited to source
Prior applications and onset dates — in sequence
Record
980 pp → 6 providers
Timeline
onset to present
Argument
yours to write
Built for the caseload, not just the file.
The status quo
1.67M SSDI applications a year
1.19M consultative exams a year at $317 each
years of records, 1 hearing to make the case

Open a claimant file that's already organized.

Everything the hearing needs — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes years of records, builds the chronology, and drafts the history with citations, so your time goes to the argument, not the filing.

Hearing file · from your templateYour template
p.31 p.212 p.640

Custom reports: your letterhead, your voice

Templates draft the medical history and the record review with inline citations. You build the argument. Export clean, in your format, every time.

Chronology · by date
2019Prior injury · lumbar strain, pre-DOI
Feb 11Date of injury — ER visit
May 22MRI — Lumbar imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Orthopedic consultation

Automated chronology: the history in order

Treatment history, listing evidence, and gaps — every event dated, sourced, and in sequence. The whole record scannable before the ALJ hearing.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Dedup & indexing: shrink the file first

Claimant files arrive bloated with duplicates and misfiled pages. Medrecords removes the redundancy and indexes what remains — so you read each page once.

Cross-checked · multi-modelClaim #M-2210
Claimant nameJane Doe✓
Date of injury2024-02-11✓
DiagnosisLumbar disc herniation✓
Prior injury2019 lumbar strain✓
Treatment to datePT ×12 · ESI ×2✓

Built to be verified — not just believed

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged, so your verification is a click, not a re-read.

Adapts to each claim

Built for expert-level decisions.

Contradictions, diagnostic inconsistencies, prior injuries: surfaced with citations, scored for confidence, and left for you to weigh. The judgment stays yours.

See the full IME workflow, capability by capability →
Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847
PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged One DICOM study
Organized recordby provider · date
01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Imaging Reports
03Aug 06Physician Notes
612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

Surface the clinical details that change opinions

Contradictions across providers, diagnostic inconsistencies, and key clinical events — highlighted on the timeline and cited to the page, so you analyze instead of search.

We help you make the call. The last word is yours.

AI does the reading, every line stays reviewable and traceable, and verification is 1 click to the source. The findings and the opinion remain yours. As they should.

Who this is for

You're the expert. Reading shouldn't be the job.

Attorney and non-attorney representatives preparing SSDI/SSI claimant files ahead of a hearing.

Contradictions and diagnostic inconsistencies highlighted with sources
Records oriented by provider, facility, and date at a glance
More files per week, with the same clinical rigor
Records review · file 3 of 9 today panel-ready
Dx: cervical radiculopathy — progress notep.212
EMG negative — 6 weeks laterconflict · p.388
Prior claim, same body part — 2021p.63
ROM measurements — all visits, comparedtable
Contradictions found for you — conclusions stay yours
The objection

“Will this help identify which listing a claimant might meet?”

It surfaces and cites the clinical findings relevant to a listing — the argument for meeting or equaling it is still yours to build.

Built for the defensible disability case.

Who we serve

One platform. Built for everyone who works the file.

The same defensible, cited record, shaped to how each team reads it: the case, the claim, or the exam.

Not sure which fits? Talk to us about Enterprise
FAQ

Social Security Disability Representatives, answered.

Yes — everything merges into one dated, cited timeline regardless of source count.

The cited chronology and summary are built to drop directly into a brief.

Ask about caseload pricing for representative-firm volume.

CONTENT HUB

The Content Hub covers medical-legal record review across IME and QME, workers’ compensation, personal injury, disability and life underwriting, mass tort, and payer integrity. Free, no login.

Browse the Content Hub

Send your next claimant file.

Read the cited timeline. Then prep the hearing.

Ranked lists