NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
HomeSolutionsLife Care Plan Foundation
CATASTROPHIC INJURY LIFE CARE FOUNDATION

A life care plan is only as defensible as the record beneath it.

Catastrophic injury life care foundation services abstract the medical record a life care plan is built from: diagnoses, functional status, equipment in use, and every future-care recommendation a treating provider actually wrote, each cited to its page. The planner decides what enters the plan and at what frequency.

Click any row → the source page it cites
Record foundation · Case #IME-4812 documented
Adams, Timothy · catastrophic injury file
342 pp / 2 packets received logged
11 duplicate pages removed free
p.140 — wrong patient quarantined
Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100%

Life care planning has published standards. So does the courtroom it ends in.

We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In catastrophic injury life care planning, both are already published.

The standard and the referee
The rulebook
  • The International Academy of Life Care Planners Standards of Practice for Life Care Planners, which require that every plan item be supported by the medical record or by a treating provider’s recommendation
  • The published Life Care Planning consensus and majority statements, which set out what the field agrees a defensible methodology looks like
  • Fed. R. Evid. 702 as amended in December 2023, under which a plan is admissible only if the method is reliably applied to the facts of this case
  • The CMS Workers’ Compensation Medicare Set-Aside Reference Guide, wherever Medicare’s interest attaches to the same future care
The referee
  • The trial court at a Rule 702 hearing, which excludes plan items that no record entry or treating recommendation supports
  • The opposing life care planner, whose rebuttal works item by item against the same chart
  • The economist who reduces the plan to present value, and who cannot defend a line the record does not carry
A six-figure plan line struck because no record entry supported it From 10¢ to as low as 5¢/page here, duplicates free
Record foundation · Case #IME-4812 cited 100%
Packet342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicatedlogged
Provider recommendationsExtracted verbatim with date and authorcited
Current equipment and careListed as the record documents itcited
Unsupported plan itemsCare with no recommendation on fileflagged
Foundation delivered · cited 100% · no plan authored
How it works

3 steps between the chart and the plan.

01

Send the whole treatment record

Acute care, rehabilitation, therapy notes, durable medical equipment orders, home health records and physician correspondence, in any format.

02

We return the foundation, page-cited

Diagnoses, functional status over time, equipment in use, and every future-care recommendation a provider wrote, each with its date, author and page.

03

The planner builds the plan

They set the items, the frequencies, the durations and the costs, and they sign it. The foundation is the record their plan cites back to.

The boundary, in writing

A foundation for the plan, not the plan.

We abstract and cite what the record documents. We do not author a life care plan, set frequencies or durations, price care items, project life expectancy, or opine on future medical need. Those are the planner’s professional judgments, made under their own credential and their own standards of practice.

In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. A plan item traced back to that page would not survive cross-examination, so the foundation quarantines it rather than carrying it forward.

Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable
08:12Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packetssystem
08:3111 pages deduplicatedsystem
08:44p.140 flagged — wrong patientsystem
08:54Record foundation complete · foundation delivered · cited 100%system
09:20Record foundation reviewed · citations verifiedreviewer
09:26Record foundation exported · life care plan authored by the plannerreviewer
Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery
Why Medrecords AI

The rules the platform never breaks.

Medrecords AI EVERY LINE CITED
CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T.342 pp
2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4
4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61
p.140 — wrong patient quarantined
Medrecords AI
Read every page · cite every line

HIPAA, under a signed BAA

Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.

Never trains a model

Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.

Every line cited

If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.

Deleted after delivery

Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.

Powered by the platform

7 capabilities behind every record foundation.

The record foundation is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.

Medical Records OCR

Every page of a multi-thousand-page catastrophic file read in full: acute charts, rehab notes, equipment orders, handwritten therapy flowsheets.

IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets, read in full

Medical Chronology

Functional status assembles itself over time, so the planner sees the trajectory rather than a snapshot.

IN ACTION · admission → current function, one timeline

Verifiable AI Citations

Every recommendation is quoted with its author, its date and its page, so the plan can cite back to a provider rather than to a planner’s memory.

IN ACTION · recommendations → cited 100%

Medical Summary Reports

The foundation exports into the planner’s own template and appendix format.

IN ACTION · foundation → plan appendix

Medical Record Deduplication

Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter.

IN ACTION · 40 charts → duplicate visit notes collapsed to 1 record each

Missing Records Identification

A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board.

IN ACTION · prescribing pattern cross-checked → gaps flagged before submission

Cross-Exam Simulator

A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice.

IN ACTION · prescribing pattern → likely hearing questions mapped
FAQ

Life care plan foundations, answered.

No. A life care plan is a credentialed professional’s work product, signed under their own standards of practice. We give the planner the cited record underneath it: diagnoses, current care, and every future-care recommendation a provider actually wrote, each linked to its page.

The usual attack is that a plan item has no support in the chart. A foundation that quotes each recommendation with its author, date and page lets the planner answer that item by item, and it flags in advance the items no record entry supports.

No, and deliberately so. Costing and life expectancy are opinions with their own methodologies and their own experts. We stay on the record side: what was documented, by whom, on what date, on what page.

No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.

No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.