The order defines the scope. The packet should respect it.
Rule 35 examination record review services prepare the examining physician’s packet: prior treatment for the conditions in controversy, imaging reports, the current course and the ordered scope itself, each cited to its page, with records outside that scope separated rather than mixed in.
The examination is ordered by a court. The order says how far it goes.
We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In court-ordered medical examinations, both are already published.
3 steps between the file and the examination room.
Send the file and the order
The produced records in any format, plus the examination order or notice that names the conditions and the permitted scope.
We return the packet, page-cited
Prior treatment for the conditions in controversy, imaging reports, the current course, and a separate index of everything outside the ordered scope.
The physician examines and reports
They perform the examination and write the Rule 35(b) report under their own name. Every finding in it is theirs, made in person.
A packet for the examiner, not an examination.
We condense and cite the records you provide. We do not examine anyone, author findings or diagnoses, draft any part of the Rule 35(b) report, or decide what falls inside the ordered scope. The examination and every clinical conclusion belong to the examining physician.
In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. An examiner who relies on a stranger’s finding hands the other side its cross-examination, so the page is quarantined on its own line.
The rules the platform never breaks.
EVERY LINE CITED
HIPAA, under a signed BAA
Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.
Never trains a model
Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.
Every line cited
If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.
Deleted after delivery
Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.
7 capabilities behind every examination packet.
The examination packet is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.
Medical Records OCR
Every page read in full, including handwritten therapy notes, so nothing relevant is left out of the packet by accident.
Medical Chronology
Prior and current treatment for the conditions at issue assemble into one timeline.
Verifiable AI Citations
Everything in the packet carries its page, and everything outside the ordered scope is listed separately rather than mixed in.
Medical Summary Reports
It exports into the examiner’s pre-exam brief in their own template.
Medical Record Deduplication
Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter.
Missing Records Identification
A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board.
Cross-Exam Simulator
A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice.
Rule 35 examination packets, answered.
Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.
No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.