Symptom validity is a record question before it is a test score.
Symptom validity record review services set reported symptoms against what the file documents: activity noted in treatment records, medication adherence, work and school entries, and prior presentations, with every inconsistency cited to its page. The validity judgment belongs to the examining clinician.
The criteria are published. The opposing expert applies them to your report.
We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In symptom validity assessment, both are already published.
3 steps between the record and the validity judgment.
Send the record and the claimed history
Treating records, prior evaluations, pharmacy history, employment and school records, and the self-reported history as given, in any format.
Get the digest back, both columns cited
Reported symptoms and onset set against what the record documents on the same dates, with each inconsistency carried as its own row and linked to both pages.
The clinician judges validity
Validity testing, interpretation and the opinion are the examining clinician’s. The digest is the collateral record the criteria require them to consider.
A cited comparison, not an accusation.
We surface what the record documents alongside what was reported, and cite both. We do not administer or score validity tests, conclude that anyone is malingering, or render any opinion on credibility. A discrepancy is a fact about two documents, not a finding about a person.
This is deliberately not a scoring product. Every flagged inconsistency opens both source pages, because the most common explanation for a discrepancy is a transcription error or a misattributed page, and the clinician has to see it to rule it out.
The rules the platform never breaks.
EVERY LINE CITED
HIPAA, under a signed BAA
Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.
Never trains a model
Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.
Every line cited
If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.
Deleted after delivery
Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.
7 capabilities behind every symptom validity record digest.
The symptom validity digest is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.
Medical Records OCR
Every page is read, including the routine primary care notes where documented activity usually appears.
Medical Chronology
Reported course and documented course sit on the same timeline, so a divergence is visible by date.
Verifiable AI Citations
Every inconsistency links to both pages, so an opposing expert cannot attribute it to a reading error.
Medical Summary Reports
It exports into the clinician’s report structure or the IME record-review section.
Medical Record Deduplication
Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter.
Missing Records Identification
A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board.
Cross-Exam Simulator (beta)
A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This beta tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice.
Symptom validity review, answered.
Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.
No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.