The presumption settles causation. The file still has to show the service.
PACT Act and toxic exposure record review services build the exposure-to-condition timeline the rating depends on: the qualifying service dates and locations in the file, every documented symptom and diagnosis after them, and the presumptive condition matched to the regulation that names it. The nexus opinion stays with the clinician.
Congress wrote the exposure list. The rater applies it to your file.
We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In toxic exposure claims the presumption is statutory, so the argument moves off causation and onto what the record documents.
3 steps between the C-file and the timeline.
Send the C-file
Service treatment records, the DD-214 and personnel file, VA and private treatment records, the exposure registry examination if there is one, and prior rating decisions, in any format.
We return the timeline, page-cited
The qualifying service dates and locations the file supports, every documented symptom and diagnosis after separation, and the presumptive condition beside the regulation that lists it.
You or the clinician file
Whether a non-presumptive condition is related to service is a medical opinion. The presumptive path needs the record, not the opinion, and this is the record.
A timeline of the file, not a decision on the presumption.
We assemble and cite what the service and treatment records document. We do not decide that a veteran qualifies for a presumption, rate a disability, state that a condition is related to an exposure, or sign anything. Those are the rater’s and the clinician’s.
In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. In a C-file that error puts another veteran’s diagnosis behind a presumptive claim, so it is quarantined rather than folded quietly into the history.
The rules the platform never breaks.
HIPAA, under a signed BAA
Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.
Never trains a model
Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.
Every line cited
If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.
Deleted after delivery
Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.
7 capabilities behind every exposure timeline.
The exposure timeline is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.
Medical Records OCR
Every page read in full, including the personnel records that establish where and when the veteran served.
Medical Chronology
Service and civilian care assemble from their own dates, so onset reads against separation on one line.
Verifiable AI Citations
Every entry links back to its page, including the ones that put the diagnosis outside the list.
Medical Summary Reports
It exports into the claim submission or the clinician’s opinion letter in their format.
Medical Record Deduplication
Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter.
Missing Records Identification
A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board.
Cross-Exam Simulator (beta)
A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This beta tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice.
PACT Act and toxic exposure record review, answered.
Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.
No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.