General causation is a literature question. Specific causation is a records question.
Toxic tort exposure record review services assemble what specific causation is argued from: the documented exposure history, dose and duration indicators, the latency interval, the diagnostic record and every alternative cause the file contains, each cited to its page. The causation opinion belongs to the expert.
The manual is published. The Rule 702 judge applies it.
We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In toxic exposure causation, both are already published.
3 steps between the record and the causation opinion.
Send the whole file
Medical records, occupational and employment history, product and residence history, industrial hygiene or monitoring data where it exists, and prior claims records, in any format.
Get the digest back, page-cited
The documented exposure history with each entry traced to its source, the latency interval computed from dated entries rather than asserted, and every alternative cause the record contains carried as its own flagged row.
The expert forms the opinion
General causation, specific causation, dose reconstruction and differential etiology are the expert’s work. The digest is the cited record the analysis rests on.
A cited record, not a causation opinion.
We assemble and cite what the record documents. We do not opine on general or specific causation, reconstruct dose, perform a differential etiology, or assess whether an agent can cause a disease. Those are the expert’s, and Rule 702 is why they have to be.
Alternative causes are flagged rather than argued. A twenty-year smoking history in a primary care note is a fact in the record, and an expert who has not seen it before writing is the expert who gets excluded.
The rules the platform never breaks.
EVERY LINE CITED
HIPAA, under a signed BAA
Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.
Never trains a model
Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.
Every line cited
If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.
Deleted after delivery
Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.
7 capabilities behind every exposure causation record digest.
The exposure causation digest is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.
Medical Records OCR
Decades of records plus employment and product history are read in full, including handwritten occupational health files.
Medical Chronology
Exposure entries, symptom onset and diagnosis assemble on one timeline, so latency is measured from dated pages rather than from the complaint.
Verifiable AI Citations
Every alternative cause links to the entry that documents it, so the expert addresses it before the other side does.
Medical Summary Reports
It exports into the expert’s report structure, the plaintiff fact sheet, or a settlement matrix submission.
Medical Record Deduplication
Forty charts pulled from multiple practices and EHR migrations carry their share of duplicate visit notes. Each is matched and collapsed to one canonical record, so the prescribing pattern is read once per real encounter.
Missing Records Identification
A prescribing pattern read across 40 charts is only as sound as the file behind it. When a chart references a visit, refill, or referral that never made it into the production, the gap is flagged before the pattern goes to the board.
Cross-Exam Simulator (beta)
A board investigator or defense counsel builds a case from the chart abstraction. This beta tool maps the questioning a physician facing that hearing is likely to face on the gaps and pattern in their own record. A rehearsal tool, not legal advice.
Toxic exposure review, answered.
Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.
No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.