NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
Best-of guides › AI medical record review software
AI medical record review software compared
42 tools, 28 columns, 1 table (2026)
Every AI medical record review tool we researched, 1 row per vendor.
By Ahmed Jemaa, Co-Founder & CEO of Medrecords AI · LinkedIn · Published 25 Aug 2026 · Updated 27 Oct 2026 · Sources checked 15 Aug 2026 to 20 Oct 2026How many AI medical record review tools are there?
This table lists 42, plus Medrecords AI.
Side by side: all 42 tools in 1 table
| Medrecords AI This is us medrecords.ai | Medical evidence AI (our product) | Law firms, LNCs, IME and QME physicians, claims teams and TPAs | Reads the full record, removes duplicates, builds a source-linked chronology, flags missing records, and drafts the work product you review, revise and sign | Teams that need a cited, defensible work product from a messy record set | Every chronology entry and answer links to its source page | AI drafts and cites; you review, revise and sign | Yours: every line is editable and opens its source page | PDFs, scans, handwriting and DICOM imaging | About 100 pages a minute (2,000 pages in about 20 minutes) | DOCX, PDF and HTML with live source links | Per deduplicated page, no subscription or seat licence | 10 cents a page, down to 5 cents at volume; duplicates free | First case is free on us. | SOC 2 and HIPAA; BAA and DPA on cloud plans | Not published | Sheridan, WY | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Listed on G2 and SourceForge | Not published | Not published | Not published | 8 of 8 | Profile | 2026-10-24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filevine filevine.com | Case management with AI | Law firms of all sizes | Case management, documents, communications and AI | Firms wanting case management plus AI | Not stated for record review | Case management software with AI features: MedChron auto-extracts dates, diagnoses, providers and codes into a chronology the customer reviews and finalizes (also Parrot deposition AI) | None disclosed | Legal documents | Hours of medical record review done in minutes, per its MedChron page; processing times may vary for larger files | Not published | Quote-based | Not published | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | 2015 | Salt Lake City, UT | $548M total across 11 rounds; latest $400M equity round, per Tracxn and Reuters | Not published | Not published | 27,100 | 4.4/5 on Capterra from 286 reviews; about 4.6-4.7 on G2 (Legalware). |
|
| Reuters covered its $400M raise; Legalware reviewed its ratings | 6 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| EvenUp evenup.com | Plaintiff AI platform | Plaintiff and personal injury firms | Demand packages, case valuation and medical chronologies | PI firms focused on demands and valuations | Evidence-based drafting per its site | PIA, its personal injury model suite, in 2 tiers: Express Demands is AI-generated, AI plus expert review adds a legal-professional pass; 99% accuracy claimed | Tier-dependent: included on AI plus expert review demands, not on Express Demands | Medical records | A first draft in minutes on Express Demands and AI Drafts, per its product videos; the expert-review tier adds a review pass, and third-party reviews report 5-7 days in practice | Not published | Project-based, quote only | Not published | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | 2019 | San Francisco, CA | $385M total; latest $150M Series E at a $2B+ valuation, per its announcement | 500-672 employees (Silicon Valley Investclub and GetLatka) | Similarweb global rank about 494K, down 38.59% month over month (Similarweb). | 9,900 | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Reuters covered its Series D and E; r/legaltech users describe its pricing and human-review trade-off | 6 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| Eve eve.legal | Plaintiff AI platform | Plaintiff firms | Case work, demands and firm-wide AI | Plaintiff firms wanting a full platform | Source-linked work product per its site | AI (self-serve; learns firm-specific drafting style) | None disclosed | Medical and legal records | Demand letters generated in minutes | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | 2020 | San Mateo, CA | $164M total; latest $103M Series B at a $1B+ valuation, per Tracxn and its announcement | Not published | Similarweb global rank about 190K, down 3.08% month over month (Similarweb). | 5,400 | 4.9 out of 5 on G2, per its site. |
|
| a16z and Artificial Lawyer covered its $103M Series B; r/legaltech users compare it with EvenUp and Supio | 6 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| Litify litify.com | Case management with AI | Law firms | Practice management on Salesforce, intake and analytics | Firms standardized on Salesforce | Not stated for record review | Not published | Not published | Legal documents | Not published | Not published | Quote-based | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2016 | Not published | $78.6M total; investors include Tiger Global, Bessemer and Fortress (Startup Intros). | 155-179 employees (GetLatka and Tracxn) | Similarweb global rank about 1.23M, down 4.78% month over month (Similarweb). | 5,400 | Capterra lists 139 reviews, with individual reviews as high as 5.0 (Capterra). |
|
| Startup Intros lists $78.6M raised; GetLatka estimates revenue. | Not profiled | vs Medrecords AI | 2026-10-20 |
| Supio supio.com | Plaintiff AI platform | Plaintiff and PI firms | Intake to verdict: chronologies, demands and drafting | Plaintiff firms wanting 1 AI platform | Evidence-based drafting per its site | 100% AI (CaseAware), human-validated benchmarks | Included - accuracy benchmarked with human expert validation | Medical records | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, per its site | 2021 | Seattle, WA | $91M total; latest $60M Series B, per its announcement | 169 employees (PitchBook) | Similarweb global rank about 708K, up 49.2% month over month (Similarweb). | 5,400 | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Its blog covered the $60M Series B; r/legaltech users compare it with EvenUp and Eve | 5 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| Tavrn tavrn.ai | Plaintiff AI platform | Attorneys, litigation support and insurers | Medical chronologies and summaries | Chronology-first teams | Not stated for every entry | 100% AI | None disclosed | Medical records | Chronology in as little as 1 hour | Not published | Not published | ~$40 per record request plus provider fees | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | Not published | Not published | $21.6M total; $15M Series A led by Left Lane Capital (PR Newswire). | 65 employees (PitchBook) | Similarweb global rank about 1.0M, down 34.74% month over month (Similarweb). | 1,300 | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| PR Newswire covered its $15M Series A led by Left Lane Capital | 7 of 8 | vs Medrecords AI | 2026-10-20 |
| Anytime AI anytimeai.ai | Legal AI suite | Plaintiff lawyers | Intake, discovery, depositions and legal drafting | Plaintiff firms wanting a broad assistant | Not stated publicly for every output | AI (agentic AI platform) | None disclosed | Legal documents | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, ISO 27001, per its site | 2023 | White Plains, NY, USA | $4M seed round in 2024, per its own announcement | Not published | Similarweb shows traffic up 56.93% month over month (Similarweb). | 880 | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| SmartAdvocate announced the partnership in 2026; PR Newswire covered its $4M seed | 5 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| DigitalOwl digitalowl.com | Claims and underwriting AI | Insurers and claims teams | Medical record analysis and claim summaries | Carriers and claims organizations | Not stated | 100% AI (self-serve medical record review) | None disclosed | Medical records | Delivery within 24 hours (self-serve) | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | 2017 | New York, NY | About $38.6M to $40.4M raised; acquired by Datavant on 8 Oct 2025 (Business Wire) | About 70 employees (PitchBook) | Similarweb shows traffic down 31.42% month over month (Similarweb). | 720 | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Its $20M Series A and $40M total were covered by its press releases and Startup Intros | 6 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| Wisedocs wisedocs.ai | Claims and underwriting AI | Insurers and claims teams | Medical record review, summaries and claim intelligence | Carriers and claims organizations | Not stated for every entry | AI + Human QA (expert clinician oversight) | Included (clinician QA on every document, per vendor) | Medical records | Hours; case study cites turnaround cut from 14 days to 2 | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, PIPEDA, per its site | 2019 | Toronto, Ontario | $16.4M to $17.2M total; $12.7M oversubscribed Series A, per Startup Intros and its blog. | Not published | Not published | 720 | Listed on G2 |
|
| Its blog and Tracxn cover the $12.7M Series A. | 5 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| CaseFleet casefleet.com | Case management with AI | Litigators | Case chronology, fact management and issue tracking | Firms that want a fact-management workspace | Source-linked facts in its chronology | AI + Human review/approval | Included (users approve every AI-extracted fact) | Legal and medical records | Not published | Not published | Published from $30/user/month | $30-$180/user/month (Starter $30, Advanced AI $140, Enterprise custom) | Not published | HIPAA, per its site | 2015 | Atlanta, GA, USA | Not raised venture funding (Tracxn); bootstrapped since 2016 | 8 employees (Tracxn); LinkedIn lists 2-10 | Similarweb global rank about 1.58M, up 18.13% month over month (Similarweb). | 590 | 4.9 out of 5 from 40 reviews on Capterra. |
|
| Lawyerist and Capterra review its pros and cons | 6 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| CaseMark AI casemark.com | Legal AI suite | Legal teams and law firms | Document analysis, summarization, drafting, case and medical record summaries | Firms wanting an affordable per-seat legal AI | Not stated for every output | 100% AI (self-serve document/deposition summarization) | None disclosed | Legal documents and medical records | Minutes; same-day turnaround | Not published | Published from $20 per seat per month (Standard) to $100 per seat per month (Pro) | $100/user/month incl. $80 in AI credits (Pro plan) | Not published | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, per its site | 2023 | San Francisco, CA | Not published | Not published | Not published | 590 | Not published |
|
| Stork.AI and SourceForge profile it; Trustpilot has a single review. | 7 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| Abstractive Health abstractivehealth.com | Record summary AI | Providers and health systems | Chart summaries, record retrieval and clinical Q&A | Clinical teams, not legal drafting | Sentence-level citations on its site | AI clinical summarization with RAG chart Q&A; no human review step described | Not published | Clinical records | Minutes (records retrieved and summarized within minutes, per its site) | PDF, FHIR, JSON; original CCD and FHIR files downloadable | Not published | Free clinician tier; Standalone $99/user/month (up to 5 users); Organization custom | Not published | HIPAA, per its site | 2022 | Not published | About $1.35M raised (Caplight). | About 13 employees (PitchBook); LinkedIn lists 2-10 | Similarweb global rank moved from about 2.57M to 1.30M over 3 months, up 53% month over month (Similarweb). | 320 | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| PitchBook, Caplight and Tracxn list its funding and headcount | 6 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| OraClaim oraclaim.com | Claims and underwriting AI | Defense firms and claims managers | Claim intake, record review and analysis | Defense firms and claims managers | Not stated | Extracts diagnoses, complaints, treatment, medications, outcomes, and prior accidents from records; flags treatment gaps, pre-existing conditions, missed appointments, and inconsistent complaints. "Final legal analysis, examiner strategy, medical opinions, and claim decisions remain with qualified professionals." | Platform is designed to reduce manual review and surface facts faster; final legal analysis, examiner strategy, medical opinions, and claim decisions remain with qualified professionals (per its own site) | Claims and medical records | First-draft medical chronology in under 60 minutes after case file ingestion, versus 15-60+ hours for traditional review, per its site | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2024 | Mountain View, California | $2.25M (PitchBook). | Not published | Not published | 210 | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| PitchBook and LinkedIn profile the company | 4 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| InPractice AI inpractice.ai | Chronology AI | Attorneys and claims teams | AI summaries and chronologies | Chronology-first teams | Source pages per its site | 100% AI (human-editable output) | None disclosed | Medical records | Minutes (processes ~3 seconds per page) | Word, PDF, Excel | Per-page and credit pricing per its site | $0.15 to $0.07/page; 4 packs from $150 to $7,000 | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | 2023 | 7127 Hollister Ave, Suite 25A-103, Goleta, CA 93117 | Not published | 8 employees (PitchBook) | Not published | 170 | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| PitchBook lists the team size | 8 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| CorMetrix (VerixAi) cormetrix.com | Chronology AI | Medico-legal reviewers and carriers | Source-linked chronologies and peer review | Reviewers who need defensibility | Source-linked by design | AI software used by the customer; users scope the timeline and approve every export, and events added by hand are checked against the record | None offered by the vendor; the reviewing attorney, LNC or expert verifies each entry through source links | Medical records | Not published | Medical chronology and DepoPrep exported as Word or PDF | Not published | Not published | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | Not published | Not published | Not raised funding (Tracxn) | 11-50 employees (LinkedIn) | Not published | 50 | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Tracxn and LinkedIn profile the company | 5 of 8 | 2026-09-25 | |
| basys.ai basys.ai | Payer review AI | Health plans and providers | Prior authorization, utilization management and clinical audits | Payers, not law firms | Not stated | AI matches prior authorization requests against patient charts and policy criteria and returns decisions with an audit trail | Not published | Clinical and claims data | Claims 4x faster time to decision and risk adjustment chart review in 3 minutes against 30 manually | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2023 | Not published | About $2.4M pre-seed, led by Nina Capital (PR Newswire). | 11-50 employees (LinkedIn); PitchBook lists 20 | Similarweb shows traffic down 57.02% month over month (Similarweb). | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| PR Newswire covered its $2.4M pre-seed led by Nina Capital. | 4 of 8 | None yet | 2026-10-20 |
| Brighterway brighterway.ai | IME compliance AI | Case types not published | Software platform in medical-legal record review | Workers' compensation claim medical record review | Not published | 100% AI | None disclosed | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2023 | San Francisco, CA, USA | Y Combinator Summer 2024 batch; founders Walker Wells and Jason Apostol | 14 employees | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | No public reviews found | Not published | Not published | Not published | 4 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| Case Chronology casechronology.com | Chronology AI | Claims adjustment; Legal litigation; Medical/healthcare (HIPAA); Complex multi-document cases | AI-powered case chronology/timeline software; Document analysis and management; Automated report generation; Duplicate detection; AI-assisted analysis | Audiences named on the vendor homepage: Claims Adjusters, Attorneys, Consultants, Expert Witnesses, C-Suite Executives, a cross-role ICP structurally very close to Medrecords AI's own stated audience (Expert Witnesses/Consultants ≈ IME/QME physicians and LNCs, Attorneys ≈ PI counsel, Claims Adjusters ≈ insurance claims… | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, per its site | 2019 | Oldsmar, FL, USA | Subsidiary of Entangle Media LLC; Mark Pinson (CEO) | 11-50 employees | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | No public reviews found | Not published | Not published | Not published | 1 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| CaseFrame AI caseframeai.com | Chronology AI | Plaintiff and defense firms | Medical record review, chronologies and summaries | Firms wanting a record-review workspace | Source-linked entries per its site | Self-serve AI document review; no human review step described | Not published | Medical records, DICOM viewer | Minutes (its site claims weeks of document review turned into minutes) | Word and HTML with source hyperlinks; PowerPoint deck generation | Seat pricing published on its site | $200/month or $2,200/year; no usage or setup fees | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Similarweb shows traffic flat month over month (Similarweb) | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Superinsight's 2026 pricing guide lists the $200/month plan; CaseFrame's own feature page describes Bates-level citations | 6 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| ChartInsight chartinsight.ai | Chronology AI | Legal and medical professionals | Automated medical records indexing and analysis | Teams already using Gemini Legal | Not stated | AI-only: secure intake, OCR for scans and handwriting, page-by-page indexing, analysis against user instructions, content generation, PDF and DOCX output | No human review step stated for the software output. The parent company sells records retrieval and validation, and ChartInsight is described as the validation tool it built for itself | Medical records | Not published | Editable DOCX with citations preserved; branded or standard PDF with page anchors; CSV (vitals matrix); Bates-stamped PDF package | Listed from $0 to $7.50 on its product page | Not published | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Gemini Legal lists a 5.0 rating from 3 reviews on its product page. |
|
| PR Newswire covered a ChartInsight product release | 4 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| Chronos AI medchronosai.com | Chronology AI | Attorneys and claims teams | AI medical chronologies and summaries | Chronology-first buyers | Not stated publicly | AI-first self-serve software; the customer's own team reviews and refines the draft | None offered by the vendor; confidence scores support the firm's own verification | Medical records | Most chronologies ready in minutes; sub-hour turnaround claimed | PDF, DOCX, and Excel for billing codes | Per-case pricing published on its site | 5 credits $245 ($49/case) to 50 credits $1,950 ($39/case); first case free | Not published | HIPAA, per its site | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| PitchBook lists about $445K raised with Haatch as an investor | 7 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| CoCounsel (Casetext) casetext.com/cocounsel | Legal AI suite | General litigation support including personal injury use cases via its medical chronology skill | CoCounsel is an AI legal assistant with a medical-chronology 'skill'/workflow among its litigation tools, alongside document review, deposition prep, | Am Law 100 firms and corporate legal departments needing AI legal research/drafting | Not published | 100% AI (self-serve legal research/drafting assistant) | None disclosed | Not published | Not published | Not published | Subscription (per-user annual), bundled with Westlaw | Core from $4,500/user/year (requires separate Westlaw subscription) | Not published | Not published | Not published | San Francisco, CA | Acquired by Thomson Reuters; deal terms Not published | 101-250 employees | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | No public reviews found | Not published | Not published | Not published | 6 of 8 | Profile | 2026-08-15 |
| Codes Health getcodeshealth.com | Plaintiff AI platform | Personal injury / plaintiff litigation | AI medical record retrieval for plaintiff firms; Medical chronologies/case summaries; AI-extracted case insights (breach of care, diagnoses, future ex | Plaintiff law firms handling personal injury litigation | Not published | AI + Human QA (agentic retrieval with human verification) | Included (human verification before delivery) | Not published | 10-12 Days (1-2 Weeks) for complete retrieval | Not published | Project-based (flat fee per case) | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2023 | 55 Prospect St #800, Brooklyn, NY 11201 | Not published | 11-50 employees | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | No public reviews found | Not published | Not published | Not published | 6 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| DocLens.ai doclens.ai | Claims and underwriting AI | Insurance carriers and insurance law firms handling liability claims and litigation across P&C lines (its published fit); case types beyond that are not broken out | An AI brain and guidance workflow for complex claims and litigation, built for P&C insurance carriers and insurance law firms | Insurance carriers and insurance law firms handling liability claims and litigation across P&C lines | Not published | Agentic AI with API-driven tools and trained NER models in an extract, evaluate, execute pipeline; automated document review | Cites the expertise of its in-house legal professionals behind summarization; no human QA step on output described | Not published | Turns hours of manual review into minutes, per its site; no committed SLA | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 4 of 8 | Profile | 2026-08-15 |
| Dodonai dodon.ai | Legal AI suite | Law firms | Managed AI systems for document-heavy workflows | Firms wanting a managed AI layer | Not stated for every entry | AI + Optional Human Managed Services (add-on) | Optional add-on ('AI Managed Services') | Documents and records | Minutes (summaries); seconds (deposition summaries) | Not published | Published credit pricing, from about $0.063/page | $25-$83/mo (4,800-120,000 credits/yr); $0.008-$0.06/page | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | 2022 | Miami, FL, USA | Not published | Not published | Similarweb shows traffic down 14.77% month over month (Similarweb). | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Tracxn profiles it among AI competitors | 7 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| InQuery inquery.ai | Chronology AI | Claims and legal teams | Medical-legal case intelligence and record review | Teams handling complex claims | Not stated | AI + Human QA | Included ('People check the work') | Medical records | 2-6 hours (standard 300-500 page PI case) | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | HIPAA, per its site | Not published | Not published | About $3.1M, with Y Combinator among investors (PitchBook). | 7 employees (PitchBook) | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| PitchBook lists about $3.1M raised with Y Combinator among investors. | 5 of 8 | 2026-10-20 | |
| LawPro AI lawpro.ai | Plaintiff AI platform | Injury law firms | Case assistant, intake and value drivers | Injury firms focused on case value | Not stated | AI-driven (citation-backed) | None disclosed | Legal and medical records | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | HIPAA, per its site | 2023 | Los Angeles, California | Closed a seed round with Scopus Ventures (PR Newswire) | About 20 employees (Tracxn) | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| PR Newswire covered its seed; r/legaltech users compare it with Eve, EvenUp and Supio | 5 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| Legalyze.ai legalyze.ai | Chronology AI | Law firms and legal professionals handling medical cases and litigation (its published fit); case types beyond that are not broken out | AI medical record review for law firms that turns records into chronologies and drafted documents; integrates with CASEpeer, MyCase, Smokeball, Litify and Sales | Law firms and legal professionals handling medical cases and litigation | Not published | AI-only: AI reviews records, builds the chronology and drafts documents; no human step described | Not published | Not published | 10 pages a minute per its FAQ; a 1,000-page file takes about 2 hours | Exportable chronologies as CSV/Excel that can be filtered and categorized | Monthly subscription tiers per its FAQ; the pricing page itself lists a custom-quoted Teams plan with demo required | Starting at $150/month for 1,000 pages, with enterprise rates as low as $0.05/page (its FAQ) | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 6 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| Medilenz medilenz.com | Chronology AI | Litigation teams and LNCs | AI medical chronologies, narrative summaries, demand letters and life care plans, with MD review | High-Volume Litigation, Complex Medical History Chronologies | Not published | AI + Human QA (AI processing with MD physician oversight) | Included (40+ associated MD specialists for manual review) | Not published | 3 business days standard; 24-hour expedited available on request | Hyperlinked PDF reports linking back to source documents | Per-hour / Per-page | $25/hour or $0.10/page for AI Medical Chronology | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | 3.7/5 on Trustpilot (1 review) | Not published | Not published | Not published | 8 of 8 | None yet | 2026-10-20 |
| MediScan AI mediscan.ai | Chronology AI | Medical-legal professionals | Editable summaries and chronologies | Small teams wanting fast summaries | Verify source pages per its site | 100% AI | None (explicitly no 'unseen reviewers'; physician retains oversight) | Medical records | Under 15 minutes for 1,000+ pages; 4-8 days reduced to 4 hours | Not published | Subscription pricing per its site | Starter: $169/mo, 1,200 pages/mo included, overage 10¢/page. Pro: $445/mo, 3,500 pages/mo included, overage 7¢/page (labeled "Most popular"). | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | 2024 | Not published | $1.4M raised, led by Tidal Ventures (GeekWire). | 10 employees (Tracxn) | Similarweb shows traffic down 38.61% month over month (Similarweb). | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| GeekWire and Healthcare IT Today covered its raise | 7 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| MedLegal AI medicalai.law | Legal AI suite | Plaintiff attorneys, defense attorneys, legal nurse consultants, insurance carriers, claims professionals and medical-legal support staff (its published fit); case types beyond that are not broken out | AI platform of 23 tools for plaintiff and defense counsel, from records analysis and timelines to demand letters, deposition prep and settlement evaluation | Plaintiff attorneys, defense attorneys, legal nurse consultants, insurance carriers, claims professionals and medical-legal support staff | Not published | AI-only software ("AI reads every word"); processing runs on AWS with Anthropic models, both under signed BAAs. A separate Physician Records Review service is sold per case | None stated for the software output. A separate paid Physician Records Review exists; who performs it and how is not stated | Not published | Case analysis and demand letters in under 60 seconds, opinion letters in seconds (homepage claims). Physician Records Review turnaround not stated | PDF or Word (Records Analyzer page) | Monthly subscription tiers (same prices for plaintiff and defense), pay-per-case option, free account for 3 case analyses, 14-day free trial with no credit card, Courtroom AI add-on | Pro $49/month (1 user, fair use 5,000 pages/month); Professional $249/month (up to 5 users); Firm $499/month (unlimited users, priority support); $19 per case; Physician Records Review $1,400 per civil case or $1,000 per workers' compensation case; Courtroom AI add-on $99 to $299/month | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 7 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| OctopusLM octopuslm.co | Chronology AI | Attorneys and insurers | AI record review and chronologies | Buyers who want transparent per-page pricing | Source-linked per its site | 100% AI | None disclosed | Medical records | Not published | Word, Excel | Per-page pricing published on its site | $0.10/page pay-as-you-go; $250/month unlimited | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, PIPEDA, per its site | 2023 | Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Its pricing page is the primary public source | 7 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| Parambil parambil.com | Mass tort AI | Mass tort and PI firms | Complex litigation evaluation and record review | Mass tort and complex litigation teams | Not stated | AI (agentic, built with Anthropic) | None disclosed | Medical records | Not published | Word, PDF; single-page or full case-package exports | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2023 | New York, NY | $6M seed, with $2M pre-seed led by Daybreak Ventures (LinkedIn and Law.com). | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Law.com and LinkedIn covered its funding. | 5 of 8 | Profile · vs Medrecords AI | 2026-08-15 |
| ProPlaintiff.ai proplaintiff.ai | Plaintiff AI platform | Case types not published | Software platform in medical-legal record review | Personal injury plaintiff firms, solo to enterprise | Not published | AI (agentic) + attorney review of drafts | Optional (attorney review before finalizing) | Not published | ~9-12 minutes for demand letter drafts | DOCX, PDF | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2023 | Tempe, AZ | Privately held, founder-owned (Kristopher Rezagholi and Jason Turnquist, co-founders) | 2-10 employees | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | 4.9/5 on G2 (17 reviews); 3.5/5 on Trustpilot (1 review) | Not published | Not published | Not published | 6 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| Quench (SmartChart) projectquench.ai | Chronology AI | Case types not published | Software platform in medical-legal record review | IME physicians, PI/mass tort firms, insurers, WC boards | Not published | AI + Human oversight | Included (implied: 'empower you, not replace you') | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2023 | San Francisco, CA | Privately held / unfunded (self-funded by founding physicians and data scientists) | About 5 employees | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | No public reviews found | Not published | Not published | Not published | 4 of 8 | Profile | 2026-08-15 |
| Record Summary AI recordsummary.ai | Record summary AI | Legal and insurance teams | AI record summaries | Summary-first buyers | Not stated | Self-serve AI: the customer uploads records and the AI writes the summary; no human step described | Not published | Medical records | Not published | Summary downloadable for offline use; file format not stated | Not published | Not published | Not published | HIPAA, per its site | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Its site is the primary public source | 3 of 8 | 2026-09-25 | |
| RecordReview.ai recordreview.ai | Chronology AI | Legal nurses, attorneys, and life care planners; sections for legal, insurance, service providers, healthcare (its published fit); case types beyond that are not broken out | AI-assisted indexing with expert human review for legal nurses, attorneys, and life care planners | Legal nurses, attorneys, and life care planners; sections for legal, insurance, service providers, healthcare | Not published | AI-assisted indexing with expert human review | Expert human review, per its hero positioning | Not published | Not published | Not published | Flat-rate, quote-driven; no plans or prices listed; free pilot offered | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 4 of 8 | Profile | 2026-08-15 |
| SiftMed siftmed.ca | Claims and underwriting AI | Insurers and claims teams (Canada) | Medical claims review and summaries | Canadian claims teams | Source-linked per its site | 100% AI | None disclosed | Medical records | Under 30 minutes average per claim file | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | Not published | Not published | Over $10M raised; latest round led by Staircase Ventures (siftmed.ca). | 30 employees (PitchBook) | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| Entrevestor and Staircase Ventures covered the round | 5 of 8 | vs Medrecords AI | 2026-10-20 |
| Stream Claims stream.claims | Claims and underwriting AI | Case types not published | Software platform in medical-legal record review | Large enterprise carriers - structuring and auditing claim documents (medical records, demand packages) | Not published | AI + Human Expert-Led ("Your Experts Lead. Stream Delivers.") | Included (outputs generated for human expert review) | Not published | Not published | API and batch SFTP integration | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2022 | San Francisco, California | Venture-backed (YC S22 batch); raised $6.8M total, seed round led by Spark Capital | 15 employees | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | No public reviews found | Not published | Not published | Not published | 5 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| Superinsight AI superinsight.ai | Chronology AI | Attorneys and disability/veterans firms | AI medical record review and chronologies | Disability, PI and veterans firms | Source-linked per its site | 100% AI | None ('only our AI processes the information') | Medical records | ~15-60 minutes per report; as fast as ~1 hour per case | Not published | Not published | $25-$80 per credit; $28-$54 per medical chronology | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | 2023 | Not published | About $620K (PitchBook) | 8 employees (PitchBook) | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| PitchBook and its docs page are the primary sources | 7 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| TackleAI tackle.ai | Claims and underwriting AI | Legal and insurance teams | Secure AI document and record review | Buyers with strict security needs | Not stated | Proprietary AI platform run in its own secure environment, no third-party or cloud components | Not published | Documents and records | Chronologies in hours instead of weeks, per its product page; no numeric SLA | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | SOC 2, HIPAA, per its site | Not published | Not published | About $9.79M over 7 rounds (CB Insights). | 27-58 employees (Tracxn and PitchBook) | Similarweb shows traffic up 3.96% month over month (Similarweb). | Under 50 or not measured | Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026 |
|
| CB Insights lists $9.79M over 7 rounds. | 3 of 8 | 2026-08-15 | |
| Trenthos IME trenthos.com | IME compliance AI | IME networks and individual specialists working Australian workers-compensation schemes (its published fit); case types beyond that are not broken out | Compliance infrastructure for medico-legal AI: reads the letter of instruction and records, builds page-referenced chronologies, and drafts a report in minutes | IME networks and individual specialists working Australian workers-compensation schemes | Not published | 6-stage pipeline: ingest, OCR, extraction, chronology, draft, export. A sliding-window extractor proposes typed facts (events, investigations, treatments, prior opinions) with dates, providers, page numbers, and verbatim quotes | AI is "forbidden, at the prompt level and in code, from originating a diagnosis, causation, prognosis or impairment rating"; the doctor examines, reasons, and opines. Reviewers accept, reject, or edit each sentence, and exports are blocked until flagged sentences are reviewed | Not published | Drafts the full report in minutes (no specific SLA published) | DOCX with the examiner's signature image, plus PDF where available; every export kept as an immutable version | Per report, no subscription required to start; first case is free | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | Under 50 or not measured | Not published | Not published | Not published | Not published | 6 of 8 | Profile | 2026-08-15 |
Pick a view to see 1 group of columns, or "All 28 columns" to see everything side by side. Click a column header to sort. The type and filter buttons narrow the rows; the count updates as you go. On a phone, swipe the table sideways; the vendor column stays put.
Short answer: which should you choose?
- Choose Medrecords AI if you need a cited, defensible work product from a messy record set at a visible price.
- Choose EvenUp, Eve or Supio if you run plaintiff personal injury cases and want demands drafted.
- Choose DigitalOwl or Wisedocs if you review claim files, APS records or IME packets at volume.
- Choose Filevine or Litify if you want chronologies inside case management software you already run.
Values are what each vendor publishes about itself, or what the named third party (PitchBook, Tracxn, Similarweb, G2, Capterra, Reddit) reports, as captured in our vendor profiles. US searches are Google monthly averages from DataForSEO, pulled 23 Oct 2026. Medrecords AI has not run the same records through these tools, so the table makes no accuracy claim about any of them.
Each column is a fact we checked: who it is built for, whether it cites source pages, whether a human reviews the output, what it reads and exports, how it prices, what security it states, who funds it, how many people search for it and what users say. Filter it, sort it, or download it as CSV or JSON.
How we researched this list: we read each vendor's own published pages (sources checked 15 Aug 2026 to 20 Oct 2026; each date is under Sources). We did not run hands-on trials of the other tools, so the order reflects fit to the task, not tested accuracy. "Not published" means we found no figure, and we do not estimate one. Medrecords AI is our product. Spot an outdated fact? Email aj@medrecords.ai and we correct it.
Medrecords AI publishes this table and sells 1 of the products in it. Our row is pinned at the top and marked. Every other value comes from the vendor's own pages or a named third party, and "Not published" means we looked and found no figure.
Key takeaways
- 42 tools are in the table, across 9 types. The biggest groups are chronology AI (14), claims and underwriting AI (7) and plaintiff AI platforms (7).
- 15 of 42 publish a price you can check. The rest sell by quote, and the well-funded plaintiff platforms (EvenUp, Eve, Supio) publish none.
- 20 of 42 state SOC 2 on their own site and 26 state HIPAA. 16 publish neither, so ask for the report before you upload a client file.
- 8 of 42 describe a human review step. For the rest, the reviewing attorney, nurse or physician is the quality check.
- 15 of 42 publish their export formats and 19 raised disclosed venture funding. Filevine (27,100 US searches a month) and EvenUp (9,900) are the most searched names.
- Free trials are the gap: none of the 42 vendors publishes a trial on the pages we read. Medrecords AI's offer is: First case is free on us.
How the 9 types of tools differ
The tools in this category do different jobs. Sorting them by type first saves a demo with the wrong kind of product. The type is our label, based on what each vendor says it sells.
| Type | Tools | Built for | What it does | Publish a price | Vendors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chronology AI | 14 | Law firms, LNCs and expert witnesses | Turns a record set into a dated, indexed chronology. The most price-transparent group: many publish per-page, per-case or monthly rates. | 8 of 14 | InPractice AI, CorMetrix (VerixAi), Case Chronology, CaseFrame AI, ChartInsight, Chronos AI, InQuery, Legalyze.ai, Medilenz, MediScan AI, OctopusLM, Quench (SmartChart), RecordReview.ai, Superinsight AI |
| Claims and underwriting AI | 7 | Insurers, TPAs, IME vendors and claims teams | Reads claim files and APS records at volume for adjusters, underwriters and IME vendors; usually enterprise contracts. | 0 of 7 | DigitalOwl, Wisedocs, OraClaim, DocLens.ai, SiftMed, Stream Claims, TackleAI |
| Plaintiff AI platform | 7 | Plaintiff personal injury firms | Demand letters, case valuation and chronologies in 1 platform, usually sold by quote after a demo. | 1 of 7 | EvenUp, Eve, Supio, Tavrn, Codes Health, LawPro AI, ProPlaintiff.ai |
| Legal AI suite | 5 | Litigators across practice areas | General legal AI (drafting, research, deposition summaries) with a medical chronology feature among many. | 4 of 5 | Anytime AI, CaseMark AI, CoCounsel (Casetext), Dodonai, MedLegal AI |
| Case management with AI | 3 | Firms that want 1 system of record | Case management software that added AI medical chronologies to an existing platform. | 1 of 3 | Filevine, Litify, CaseFleet |
| Record summary AI | 2 | Clinicians and record reviewers | Summarizes clinical records; built for healthcare first and adapted to legal use. | 1 of 2 | Abstractive Health, Record Summary AI |
| IME compliance AI | 2 | IME physicians and IME vendors | Supports independent medical exam report work and compliance. | 0 of 2 | Brighterway, Trenthos IME |
| Payer review AI | 1 | Health plans and UM teams | Prior authorization and utilization review for payers, not litigation. | 0 of 1 | basys.ai |
| Mass tort AI | 1 | Mass tort firms | Screens and scores large plaintiff inventories against case criteria. | 0 of 1 | Parambil |
Who should choose which type
- You run plaintiff personal injury cases and want demands drafted: start with the plaintiff AI platforms (EvenUp, Eve, Supio, Tavrn, Codes Health). Expect a demo and a quote.
- You need a chronology you can check line by line, at a price you can see: start with chronology AI. 8 of the 14 in this group publish a rate.
- You review claim files, APS records or IME packets at volume: start with claims and underwriting AI (DigitalOwl, Wisedocs, OraClaim, DocLens.ai).
- You want 1 system for the whole case: case management with AI (Filevine, Litify, CaseFleet) adds chronologies to software you may already run.
- You need a cited, defensible work product from a messy record set and want to see the price first: that is what Medrecords AI is built for. It drafts and cites; you review, revise and sign. It does not retrieve records or sign opinions.
Pricing: every published rate in 1 place
15 of 42 vendors publish a price. Their rates sit in 4 shapes: per page, per case, per seat per month, and monthly plans with a page allowance. The other 27 ask you to request a quote; they are marked "Not published" in the main table.
| Vendor | Type | Pricing model | Published price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medrecords AI (us) | Medical evidence AI | Per deduplicated page, no subscription or seat licence | 10 cents a page, down to 5 cents at volume; duplicates free |
| Tavrn | Plaintiff AI platform | Not published | ~$40 per record request plus provider fees |
| CaseFleet | Case management with AI | Published from $30/user/month | $30-$180/user/month (Starter $30, Advanced AI $140, Enterprise custom) |
| CaseMark AI | Legal AI suite | Published from $20 per seat per month (Standard) to $100 per seat per month (Pro) | $100/user/month incl. $80 in AI credits (Pro plan) |
| Abstractive Health | Record summary AI | Not published | Free clinician tier; Standalone $99/user/month (up to 5 users); Organization custom |
| InPractice AI | Chronology AI | Per-page and credit pricing per its site | $0.15 to $0.07/page; 4 packs from $150 to $7,000 |
| CaseFrame AI | Chronology AI | Seat pricing published on its site | $200/month or $2,200/year; no usage or setup fees |
| Chronos AI | Chronology AI | Per-case pricing published on its site | 5 credits $245 ($49/case) to 50 credits $1,950 ($39/case); first case free |
| CoCounsel (Casetext) | Legal AI suite | Subscription (per-user annual), bundled with Westlaw | Core from $4,500/user/year (requires separate Westlaw subscription) |
| Dodonai | Legal AI suite | Published credit pricing, from about $0.063/page | $25-$83/mo (4,800-120,000 credits/yr); $0.008-$0.06/page |
| Legalyze.ai | Chronology AI | Monthly subscription tiers per its FAQ; the pricing page itself lists a custom-quoted Teams plan with demo required | Starting at $150/month for 1,000 pages, with enterprise rates as low as $0.05/page (its FAQ) |
| Medilenz | Chronology AI | Per-hour / Per-page | $25/hour or $0.10/page for AI Medical Chronology |
| MediScan AI | Chronology AI | Subscription pricing per its site | Starter: $169/mo, 1,200 pages/mo included, overage 10¢/page. Pro: $445/mo, 3,500 pages/mo included, overage 7¢/page (labeled "Most popular"). |
| MedLegal AI | Legal AI suite | Monthly subscription tiers (same prices for plaintiff and defense), pay-per-case option, free account for 3 case analyses, 14-day free trial with no credit card, Courtroom AI add-on | Pro $49/month (1 user, fair use 5,000 pages/month); Professional $249/month (up to 5 users); Firm $499/month (unlimited users, priority support); $19 per case; Physician Records Review $1,400 per civil case or $1,000 per workers' compensation case; Courtroom AI add-on $99 to $299/month |
| OctopusLM | Chronology AI | Per-page pricing published on its site | $0.10/page pay-as-you-go; $250/month unlimited |
| Superinsight AI | Chronology AI | Not published | $25-$80 per credit; $28-$54 per medical chronology |
Company snapshot: who is funded and how big
18 vendors have disclosed venture funding, sorted here by total raised. Funding and headcount come from the vendor's announcement or a named data provider (PitchBook, Tracxn, Crunchbase); providers lag, so treat these as ranges.
| Vendor | Founded | HQ | Funding | Team |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Filevine | 2015 | Salt Lake City, UT | $548M total across 11 rounds; latest $400M equity round, per Tracxn and Reuters | Not published |
| EvenUp | 2019 | San Francisco, CA | $385M total; latest $150M Series E at a $2B+ valuation, per its announcement | 500-672 employees (Silicon Valley Investclub and GetLatka) |
| Eve | 2020 | San Mateo, CA | $164M total; latest $103M Series B at a $1B+ valuation, per Tracxn and its announcement | Not published |
| Supio | 2021 | Seattle, WA | $91M total; latest $60M Series B, per its announcement | 169 employees (PitchBook) |
| Litify | 2016 | Not published | $78.6M total; investors include Tiger Global, Bessemer and Fortress (Startup Intros). | 155-179 employees (GetLatka and Tracxn) |
| DigitalOwl | 2017 | New York, NY | About $38.6M to $40.4M raised; acquired by Datavant on 8 Oct 2025 (Business Wire) | About 70 employees (PitchBook) |
| Tavrn | Not published | Not published | $21.6M total; $15M Series A led by Left Lane Capital (PR Newswire). | 65 employees (PitchBook) |
| Wisedocs | 2019 | Toronto, Ontario | $16.4M to $17.2M total; $12.7M oversubscribed Series A, per Startup Intros and its blog. | Not published |
| SiftMed | Not published | Not published | Over $10M raised; latest round led by Staircase Ventures (siftmed.ca). | 30 employees (PitchBook) |
| TackleAI | Not published | Not published | About $9.79M over 7 rounds (CB Insights). | 27-58 employees (Tracxn and PitchBook) |
| Stream Claims | 2022 | San Francisco, California | Venture-backed (YC S22 batch); raised $6.8M total, seed round led by Spark Capital | 15 employees |
| Parambil | 2023 | New York, NY | $6M seed, with $2M pre-seed led by Daybreak Ventures (LinkedIn and Law.com). | Not published |
| Anytime AI | 2023 | White Plains, NY, USA | $4M seed round in 2024, per its own announcement | Not published |
| InQuery | Not published | Not published | About $3.1M, with Y Combinator among investors (PitchBook). | 7 employees (PitchBook) |
| basys.ai | 2023 | Not published | About $2.4M pre-seed, led by Nina Capital (PR Newswire). | 11-50 employees (LinkedIn); PitchBook lists 20 |
| OraClaim | 2024 | Mountain View, California | $2.25M (PitchBook). | Not published |
| MediScan AI | 2024 | Not published | $1.4M raised, led by Tidal Ventures (GeekWire). | 10 employees (Tracxn) |
| Abstractive Health | 2022 | Not published | About $1.35M raised (Caplight). | About 13 employees (PitchBook); LinkedIn lists 2-10 |
Which vendors buyers search for most
US Google searches a month for each brand name, from DataForSEO on 23 Oct 2026, next to Similarweb's traffic estimate where we have it. Search volume measures attention, not quality. Filevine's figure includes its whole case management business.
| Vendor | US searches / month | Type | Web traffic (Similarweb) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Filevine | 27,100 | Case management with AI | Not published |
| EvenUp | 9,900 | Plaintiff AI platform | Similarweb global rank about 494K, down 38.59% month over month (Similarweb). |
| Eve | 5,400 | Plaintiff AI platform | Similarweb global rank about 190K, down 3.08% month over month (Similarweb). |
| Litify | 5,400 | Case management with AI | Similarweb global rank about 1.23M, down 4.78% month over month (Similarweb). |
| Supio | 5,400 | Plaintiff AI platform | Similarweb global rank about 708K, up 49.2% month over month (Similarweb). |
| Tavrn | 1,300 | Plaintiff AI platform | Similarweb global rank about 1.0M, down 34.74% month over month (Similarweb). |
| Anytime AI | 880 | Legal AI suite | Similarweb shows traffic up 56.93% month over month (Similarweb). |
| DigitalOwl | 720 | Claims and underwriting AI | Similarweb shows traffic down 31.42% month over month (Similarweb). |
| Wisedocs | 720 | Claims and underwriting AI | Not published |
| CaseFleet | 590 | Case management with AI | Similarweb global rank about 1.58M, up 18.13% month over month (Similarweb). |
| CaseMark AI | 590 | Legal AI suite | Not published |
| Abstractive Health | 320 | Record summary AI | Similarweb global rank moved from about 2.57M to 1.30M over 3 months, up 53% month over month (Similarweb). |
| OraClaim | 210 | Claims and underwriting AI | Not published |
| InPractice AI | 170 | Chronology AI | Not published |
| CorMetrix (VerixAi) | 50 | Chronology AI | Not published |
What reviewers praise and flag
Summaries of public reviews (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot) and practitioner threads (Reddit r/legaltech and r/LawFirm), as captured in each vendor profile. A line says who said it where we know. Where a vendor has no public reviews, its card is left out.
Filevine
4.4/5 on Capterra from 286 reviews; about 4.6-4.7 on G2 (Legalware).
What users praise
- Full legal operating system with nearly 6,000 customers
- Capterra 4.4/5 from 286 reviews
What users flag
- Quote-only pricing
- A platform, not a focused record-review tool
EvenUp
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Human review on every demand, which users cite for accuracy
- $385M raised, 2,000+ firms, 200K+ cases
What users flag
- Most expensive option in 1 Reddit comparison
- Credit-based pricing described as confusing
- Slower processing because of human review
Eve
4.9 out of 5 on G2, per its site.
What users praise
- Fast processing: up to 25 files in 5-10 minutes, per a Reddit user
- 4.9/5 on G2 and $164M raised
What users flag
- Requires upfront configuration
- About $350 per case, per a Reddit user
- 1 user says it cannot process more than 25,000 pages
Litify
Capterra lists 139 reviews, with individual reviews as high as 5.0 (Capterra).
What users praise
- Salesforce-native practice management
- Capterra reviews up to 5.0
What users flag
- Quote-only pricing
- Not a record-review tool
Supio
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Strong for medical malpractice and expense extraction, per a Reddit user
- Broad plaintiff platform, $91M raised, 169 staff
What users flag
- 1 user reports a 2-3 day turnaround due to human review
- 1 user says it lacked document drafting at the time of their review
- No published pricing
Tavrn
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Medical chronologies and summaries, $21.6M raised
- SOC 2 and HIPAA
What users flag
- No published pricing
- No review listing
Anytime AI
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Closed AI platform built exclusively for plaintiff lawyers
- SmartAdvocate partnership and trial-lawyer co-design
- SOC 2 and HIPAA
What users flag
- No published pricing
- No independent review listing
DigitalOwl
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- NLP record analysis built for insurers
- SOC 2 and HIPAA
What users flag
- No published pricing
- Traffic down 31% month over month on Similarweb
Wisedocs
Listed on G2
What users praise
- Record review built for insurers, about $17M raised
- Public trust center, SOC 2 and HIPAA
What users flag
- No published pricing
- No independent review score
CaseFleet
4.9 out of 5 from 40 reviews on Capterra.
What users praise
- 4.9/5 on Capterra from 40 reviews
- Purpose-built chronology and fact management
What users flag
- Not for solos or transactional work (Lawyerist)
- Fewer integrations and weak accounting, per Lawyerist
CaseMark AI
Not published
What users praise
- Published pricing: $20 Standard and $100 Pro per seat per month
- Case, medical record and page-line summaries
What users flag
- Only 1 Trustpilot review, rated 3.7
- No independent G2 or Capterra listing found
Abstractive Health
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Sentence-level citations on summaries
- Focused clinical team for providers
What users flag
- No G2 or Capterra listing
- About $1.35M raised, early stage
OraClaim
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Defense-side claim intelligence
- $2.25M raised (PitchBook)
What users flag
- No published pricing
- No review listing
InPractice AI
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Fast summaries and chronologies
- 8-person focused team
What users flag
- No independent review listing
- Funding not published
CorMetrix (VerixAi)
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Source-linked, defensible chronologies via VerixAi
- Built by clinical and legal experts
What users flag
- No funding yet (Tracxn)
- 11-50 staff, early stage
basys.ai
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Agentic prior-authorization for payers
- Harvard spinout with Nina Capital backing
What users flag
- Payer-only, not a legal review tool
- No G2 or Capterra listing
CaseFrame AI
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- $200 per user per month with unlimited documents, users and cases
- Every timeline entry carries date, time, provider, page and Bates number
- SOC 2 and HIPAA
What users flag
- Seat-based cost scales with the number of users
- No independent review listing
- Funding not published
ChartInsight
Gemini Legal lists a 5.0 rating from 3 reviews on its product page.
What users praise
- Automated medical records indexing from $0 to $7.50
- SOC 2 and HIPAA
What users flag
- Few public reviews (3 on its product page)
- A Gemini Legal product, not standalone
Chronos AI
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Fast AI chronologies with per-case pricing
- HIPAA
What users flag
- Minimal public reviews
- Funding not published
Dodonai
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Published per-page pricing from about $0.063
- Firm-owned AI systems around existing software
What users flag
- No independent review listing
- Funding not published
InQuery
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Y Combinator-backed medical-legal case intelligence
- HIPAA
What users flag
- No published pricing
- No review listing
LawPro AI
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Simple, intuitive platform and no page limit, per a Reddit user
- About $85 per case in a user's comparison
What users flag
- Set per-page price agreed upfront
- Narrowly tailored to PI firms
MediScan AI
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Summaries and chronologies with source verification
- Tidal Ventures led its $1.4M round
What users flag
- No review listing
- Traffic down 38.6% month over month on Similarweb
OctopusLM
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Published per-page pricing
- HIPAA
What users flag
- No review listing
- Funding not published
Parambil
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- AI for mass tort and complex litigation
- $6M seed, $2M pre-seed from Daybreak Ventures
What users flag
- No published pricing
- No review listing
Record Summary AI
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Fast AI record summaries
- HIPAA
What users flag
- No published pricing
- No review listing
SiftMed
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Trustworthy medical claims review for Canadian teams
- Over $10M raised, led by Staircase Ventures
What users flag
- No published pricing
- No review listing
Superinsight AI
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Use cases by practice area (disability, PI, veterans)
- SOC 2 and HIPAA
What users flag
- No published pricing
- About $620K raised, early stage
TackleAI
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026
What users praise
- Security-first document and record review
- SOC 2 and HIPAA
What users flag
- No published pricing
- No review listing
Where they are cited
Press coverage and forum threads that mention each vendor. Useful for checking claims against someone other than the vendor.
| Vendor | Cited in |
|---|---|
| Filevine | Reuters covered its $400M raise; Legalware reviewed its ratings |
| EvenUp | Reuters covered its Series D and E; r/legaltech users describe its pricing and human-review trade-off |
| Eve | a16z and Artificial Lawyer covered its $103M Series B; r/legaltech users compare it with EvenUp and Supio |
| Litify | Startup Intros lists $78.6M raised; GetLatka estimates revenue. |
| Supio | Its blog covered the $60M Series B; r/legaltech users compare it with EvenUp and Eve |
| Tavrn | PR Newswire covered its $15M Series A led by Left Lane Capital |
| Anytime AI | SmartAdvocate announced the partnership in 2026; PR Newswire covered its $4M seed |
| DigitalOwl | Its $20M Series A and $40M total were covered by its press releases and Startup Intros |
| Wisedocs | Its blog and Tracxn cover the $12.7M Series A. |
| CaseFleet | Lawyerist and Capterra review its pros and cons |
| CaseMark AI | Stork.AI and SourceForge profile it; Trustpilot has a single review. |
| Abstractive Health | PitchBook, Caplight and Tracxn list its funding and headcount |
| OraClaim | PitchBook and LinkedIn profile the company |
| InPractice AI | PitchBook lists the team size |
| CorMetrix (VerixAi) | Tracxn and LinkedIn profile the company |
| basys.ai | PR Newswire covered its $2.4M pre-seed led by Nina Capital. |
| CaseFrame AI | Superinsight's 2026 pricing guide lists the $200/month plan; CaseFrame's own feature page describes Bates-level citations |
| ChartInsight | PR Newswire covered a ChartInsight product release |
| Chronos AI | PitchBook lists about $445K raised with Haatch as an investor |
| Dodonai | Tracxn profiles it among AI competitors |
| InQuery | PitchBook lists about $3.1M raised with Y Combinator among investors. |
| LawPro AI | PR Newswire covered its seed; r/legaltech users compare it with Eve, EvenUp and Supio |
| MediScan AI | GeekWire and Healthcare IT Today covered its raise |
| OctopusLM | Its pricing page is the primary public source |
| Parambil | Law.com and LinkedIn covered its funding. |
| Record Summary AI | Its site is the primary public source |
| SiftMed | Entrevestor and Staircase Ventures covered the round |
| Superinsight AI | PitchBook and its docs page are the primary sources |
| TackleAI | CB Insights lists $9.79M over 7 rounds. |
What each column means
- Type
- Our label for the job the product does, from its own description.
- Primary buyer
- Who the vendor says it sells to.
- What it does
- The scope the vendor describes, in 1 line.
- Best for
- The use case the product fits best, from its published materials.
- Source citations
- Whether the vendor says each output line links to the page it came from.
- Processing model
- AI only, AI plus human review, or a human team, as the vendor describes it.
- Human review
- Whether a person at the vendor checks the output before you see it.
- Formats read
- File types the vendor says it reads (PDF, scans, handwriting, imaging).
- Turnaround
- The time per case or per page the vendor publishes.
- Export formats
- What you can take out (DOCX, PDF, hyperlinked PDF, Excel).
- Pricing model
- How the vendor charges: per page, per case, per seat, subscription or quote.
- Published price
- A figure from the vendor's own page. Never estimated.
- Free trial
- A trial or free tier stated on the pages we read.
- Security
- Certifications the vendor states on its own site. We have not seen the reports.
- Founded, HQ, Funding, Team
- From the vendor's site or announcement, or a named data provider.
- Web traffic
- Similarweb global rank and month-over-month change, where available.
- US searches / month
- Google monthly search volume for the brand name, DataForSEO, 23 Oct 2026.
- Review listings
- Where the vendor is rated, and the rating.
- What users praise / flag
- Summaries of public reviews and practitioner threads.
- Press and forums
- Where the vendor has been covered or discussed.
- Rubric fields published
- How many of our 8 profile fields (processing model, human QA, turnaround, pricing model, cost, exports, best for, satisfaction) the vendor publishes.
- Last checked
- When the vendor profile behind the row was last verified.
FAQ
What is AI medical record review software?
Software that reads a set of medical records, sorts and deduplicates them, and produces a chronology, summary or answers about the file. It works on records you already hold. It is not a records retrieval service and it does not give a medical opinion; a qualified person still owns the conclusion.
How many AI medical record review tools are there?
This table lists 42, plus Medrecords AI. They split into 9 types; chronology AI (14 tools) and claims and underwriting AI (7) are the largest groups.
How much does AI medical record review software cost?
15 of 42 vendors publish a price. Published rates run from about 5 to 10 cents a page (InPractice AI, OctopusLM, Legalyze.ai at volume) to per-case credits (Chronos AI from $39 a case) and seat plans (CaseFleet from $30 a user a month, CoCounsel from $4,500 a user a year). Medrecords AI is 10 cents a deduplicated page, down to 5 cents at volume, with duplicates free.
Which AI medical record review tools cite the source page?
10 of 42 say their output links back to the source document. Ask for a sample where you can click from a chronology line to the page and check it yourself; Medrecords AI links every line to its source page.
Which tools include a human review step?
8 of 42 describe a person checking the output, for example EvenUp's expert-review tier, Wisedocs' clinician QA and Medilenz's MD oversight. The rest are AI only, which means your reviewer is the quality check.
Are these tools HIPAA compliant and SOC 2 certified?
26 state HIPAA and 20 state SOC 2 on their own site; 17 state neither. We have not seen their audit reports. Ask each vendor for its SOC 2 report and BAA before you upload a client file. Medrecords AI is SOC 2 and HIPAA compliant and signs a BAA and NDA.
Is this table ranked?
No. Rows are ordered by US search demand, then by name, and you can sort by any column. Medrecords AI publishes the page and pins its own row at the top, marked "This is us".
How do I try Medrecords AI?
Book a short demo. First case is free on us. Access follows within 1 business day, and the platform processes about 100 pages a minute.
How this table was built
- Who is in it: every software vendor in our Content Hub and head-to-head library whose product reviews medical records with AI. Records retrieval firms, nurse consulting firms and outsourced review services are left out; they are a different category, covered in the best medical record review services.
- Where values come from: 36 vendor profiles in our vendor research and 595 published head-to-head comparisons, each with its sources listed. Each row links to the profile that holds them.
- What "Not published" means: we looked on the vendor's site and the usual data providers and found no figure. We do not estimate.
- What the table is not: a benchmark. We have not run the same records through these tools, so no column scores accuracy.
- Our bias: Medrecords AI publishes this page and sells 1 of the products. Our row is marked. Check any claim against the vendor's own page before you act on it.
Cite or reuse this dataset
Quote any row with a link to this page. Suggested citation:
Medrecords AI. "AI medical record review software compared: 42 tools, 28 columns, 1 table (2026)." Updated 24 Oct 2026. https://medrecords.ai/best/ai-medical-record-review-software/
The same data as files: ai-medical-record-review-software-2026.csv and ai-medical-record-review-software-2026.json. Found a wrong value? Email aj@medrecords.ai with the page that shows the right one and the row gets corrected, usually within 1 business day.
Bring us your ugliest case.
First case is free on us. Every line of the chronology links to the page it came from, so you can check it against the table above.
Book a demoSources
Each vendor row draws on the profile linked here, which lists every source with the date it was read. Search volumes: DataForSEO, US, 23 Oct 2026. Vendor links open the vendor's own site.
- Abstractive Health · abstractivehealth.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Anytime AI · anytimeai.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Brighterway · brighterway.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Case Chronology · casechronology.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- CaseFleet · casefleet.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- CaseFrame AI · caseframeai.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- CaseMark AI · casemark.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- ChartInsight · chartinsight.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Chronos AI · medchronosai.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- CoCounsel (Casetext) · casetext.com/cocounsel, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Codes Health · getcodeshealth.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- CorMetrix (VerixAi) · cormetrix.com, profile checked 2026-09-25
- DigitalOwl · digitalowl.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- DocLens.ai · doclens.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Dodonai · dodon.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Eve · eve.legal, profile checked 2026-08-15
- EvenUp · evenup.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Filevine · filevine.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- InPractice AI · inpractice.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- InQuery · inquery.ai, profile checked 2026-10-20
- LawPro AI · lawpro.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Legalyze.ai · legalyze.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Litify · litify.com, profile checked 2026-10-20
- MediScan AI · mediscan.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- MedLegal AI · medicalai.law, profile checked 2026-08-15
- OctopusLM · octopuslm.co, profile checked 2026-08-15
- OraClaim · oraclaim.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Parambil · parambil.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- ProPlaintiff.ai · proplaintiff.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Quench (SmartChart) · projectquench.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Record Summary AI · recordsummary.ai, profile checked 2026-09-25
- RecordReview.ai · recordreview.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- SiftMed · siftmed.ca, profile checked 2026-10-20
- Stream Claims · stream.claims, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Superinsight AI · superinsight.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Supio · supio.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- TackleAI · tackle.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Tavrn · tavrn.ai, profile checked 2026-10-20
- Trenthos IME · trenthos.com, profile checked 2026-08-15
- Wisedocs · wisedocs.ai, profile checked 2026-08-15
When to pick another tool
Medrecords AI is on this list, and we sell it. Pick another tool in these cases.
- You need the records requested first. Medrecords AI reads the file you already hold. It does not request records from providers. See the best medical record retrieval services.
- You want a team to read the file and hand back a finished summary. Medrecords AI is software your own team reviews, not a vendor team that does the reading for you. See the best medical record review services.
- You need a signed medical opinion or an IME. Medrecords AI drafts and cites. It does not examine patients or sign opinions. See the best IME and peer review companies.
- You want the demand letter drafted for you. Medrecords AI builds the cited medical record a demand stands on. It does not write the demand. See the best AI demand letter software.