NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
HomeSolutionsPlaintiff Attorneys

We draft 90% of the medical chronology for plaintiff attorneys.

Drafted into your demand package. You verify and send.

Every provider, visit, diagnosis, and billed charge comes out of your client's file dated, deduplicated, and cited to the page. Specials are itemized to the billing page, and prior conditions surface while you can still address them.

2,000 pages in 20 minutesHIPAASOC 2
Demand packagefor plaintiff attorneys
demand
ED record · p.14
"Acute lumbar radiculopathy, post-collision."
Ortho op note · p.1,102
"L4-L5 discectomy performed 14 Mar 2024."
Treatment continuous — 41 visits over 18 monthsp.14 · p.1,102
Billed specials — $214,880 across 9 providersp.1,940
+ Add to demand package
Specials
$214,880 cited
Providers
9, deduplicated
Narrative
yours to argue
Bates-stampable source on every line
The status quo

Plaintiff firms carry the burden of proof and the cost of assembling it: records, itemized bills, lien statements, prior charts. Paralegal review and outsourcing are slow, costly, and prone to leave damages in the file.

6 wks
to the demand deadline
2,400 pp
of records, bills, and liens
$0
recovered for treatment nobody found

Get the demand package, without assembling it yourself.

Everything you need to prove the claim: structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes the file, pulls every treatment and billed charge, and builds summaries backed by citations, so your team works on the case, not on sorting.

Case summary · auto-drafted
p.12 p.47 p.118

Summaries: the whole case in one view

A complete, structured summary that surfaces every treating provider, missing records, and the full course of care. Every claim is traced back to the page it came from.

Chronology · by date
Feb 11X-Ray — Chest
Apr 02Progress Note
May 22MRI — Cervical imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Consultation Report

Automated chronology: every event in order

Every page placed by date, provider, and event — with imaging inline and gaps flagged. Scroll the case instead of hunting through PDFs.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Indexing & dedup: a clean, searchable file

Medrecords detects duplicates, flags mismatches, and separates unrelated claimants, so you never bill a charge twice or miss the provider buried in a second production.

Cross-checked · multi-modelCase #12345
Patient nameJane Doe
Date of birth1985-04-15
DiagnosisRight arm fracture
Diagnosis codeS42.301A
Surgery date2024-10-07

Built to be verified (not just believed)

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged — so your verification is a click, not a re-read.

Adapts to each claim

Built for building the claim.

You shouldn't have to patch together PDFs, spreadsheets, and Word docs to prove causation and damages. Medrecords gives you one structured, cited view, ready to argue from.

Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847
PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged One DICOM study
Organized recordby provider · date
01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Billing Statements
03Aug 06Physician Notes
612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

Focus on the facts that carry your damages

Configure custom review templates so you can prioritize what the demand turns on: specials, causation, permanency, future care. Your team gets exactly what it needs to put a number on the claim.

See the structure of the case before you dig in

Medrecords processes the full record with AI, cross-checks it across multiple models, and cites every line — so you know what the file proves before you decide what to ask for.

Who this is for

Your demand is due in six weeks. The file is 2,400 pages.

Plaintiff counsel isn't paid to sort records. You're paid to prove what happened to your client and what it cost. Medrecords reads the whole file first, so the demand starts from a complete tally.

Every treating provider, visit, and billed charge accounted for
A cited chronology ready to drop into the demand and the mediation binder
Every line of the summary traceable to its source page in one click
Demand package · Doe v. Acme cited
Mechanism of injury — rear-end collision, 12 Jan 2024p.9
L4-L5 herniation confirmed on MRIp.318
Discectomy, then 22 sessions of physical therapyp.1,102
Billed specials — $214,880 across 9 providersp.1,940
Found in the record — ready for the demand
The objection

"Is AI work-product defensible?"

You remain the author. Extractive mode produces zero-inference output: facts and citations only — and every line traces to a Bates-stampable source page. The record behind your demand is the record itself.

20 min to read 2,000 pages at 100 pages a minute

Every extraction carries its citation and a confidence score. Low-confidence pulls are flagged for you to check, so verification is a click on the page rather than a re-read of the file.

Extractive mode · zero-inference output
Who we serve

One platform. Built for everyone who works the file.

The same defensible, cited record, shaped to how each team reads it: the case, the claim, or the exam.

Not sure which fits? Talk to us about Enterprise

Test it on a closed matter.

See what it finds in a file you already know cold — every finding cited to the page.