Every claim in their report, checked against the record.
Expert report rebuttal software for defense attorneys: Medrecords AI reads the opposing report against the underlying file and drafts the rebuttal as a claim-by-claim matrix, each one marked supported, unsupported or contradicted, with the page. You judge it and you sign the response.
What you walk out with
Not a summary of their report. The claims pulled out of it and set against what the file actually says.
The claims matrix
Every factual assertion in their report as its own row, with the record entry that supports it or the note that none exists.
The contradictions
Entries in the file that cut against a claim, surfaced with the page, including the ones their report never addressed.
The omissions
Records in the file their report does not cite at all, listed so you can ask why in the only forum that matters.
The rebuttal draft
Your template, your section order, each response carrying the citation it rests on so the court can check it.
Your judgment, multiplied
A rebuttal is won on what their expert did not read. Finding it means reading the whole file against their report line by line, which is exactly the work that gets compressed when the deadline is close.
What comes off your desk is that compare. What stays yours is the strategy: which weaknesses to press, which to leave alone, and how the response reads. Defense teams use this to answer a report in days instead of weeks, and to brief the retained expert on the gaps before the deposition rather than after.
How the draft gets built
Three steps, each one a capability you can open and read on its own.
Read both documents
The opposing report and the underlying record, every page, duplicates stripped and never billed to you.
Deduplication →Check every claim
Each assertion matched to the record entry behind it, or marked as having none, with contradictions surfaced.
Opinion attack simulator →Draft the response
Your template, your argument order, every line opening the page it rests on.
Custom report builder →You sign it. That is the point.
The matrix reports what the record says and what their report says about it. It does not judge the opposing expert, rate their credibility or decide whether an opinion should be excluded. Those are your calls and the court’s, and the citations are there so you can make them.
Expert report rebuttal: common questions
Send their report and the file. Read the matrix.
Bring a real opposing report with the record behind it. You get the claim-by-claim matrix back, cited, and you judge whether it found what you would have.
Test a file