NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
HomeDeliverablesForensic evaluation report
forensic evaluation report software for forensic psychologists

The record review your report rests on, assembled and cited.

Forensic evaluation report software for forensic psychologists: Medrecords AI assembles the records section of the report, with the lifetime psychiatric history, the treatment course, medication adherence and the collateral entries on one cited timeline, each linked to its source page. The examination and the opinion stay yours.

Your report structure·One cited timeline·No opinion rendered

What you walk out with

The records section drafted into your own report structure, so the evening goes to the reasoning rather than the retyping.

The records section

Drafted in your section order and your standard language, populated from the file rather than handed to you as a wall of summary.

The lifetime timeline

Every documented contact, hospitalization, medication and custody episode in order, anchored to whatever date the referral question turns on.

The collateral entries

School, employment, agency and pharmacy records carried as their own rows, which is where the published guidelines expect you to have looked.

The quoted record

Every line you quote opens the page it came from, so an omission alleged by the opposing evaluator is answered in one click.

Who this is for

Your judgment, multiplied

The opinion is the product and your licence is why it is worth anything. Nothing here touches that. No instrument is scored, no criterion is applied to a person, no conclusion is drawn.

What changes is the reading. Three thousand pages across a dozen systems, the timeline assembly and the citation hunt come off your evening. Evaluators use that to take more referrals a month, and to arrive at the interview having actually read the collateral rather than skimmed it.

How the draft gets built

Three steps, each one a capability you can open and read on its own.

Step 1

Read the whole file

Jail, hospital, agency, school and pharmacy records, handwriting included, duplicates stripped and never billed to you.

Handwriting extraction →
Step 2

Build the timeline

Every documented contact in order, anchored to the date your referral question turns on, with adherence carried as its own row.

Chronology →
Step 3

Draft your records section

Your structure, your headings, every quoted line linked to its source page.

Custom report builder →

You sign it. That is the point.

The software drafts and cites the record. It does not examine anyone, score an instrument, apply a diagnostic or legal standard to a person, or render any forensic opinion. The evaluation is yours, the opinion is yours, and the signature is the whole point.

Forensic evaluation report: common questions

No. It drafts the records section and cites it. Diagnosis, the application of a legal standard, and every conclusion in the report are yours, formed after your own examination.

Any of them, because the work underneath is the same: read the file, build the timeline, cite it. The case-type pages cover competency, criminal responsibility, mitigation, custody, fitness for duty, risk and civil damages with their own standards named.

No. Test administration and scoring require your training and your licence. It surfaces documented inconsistencies in the collateral record with both source pages, which is what the published criteria ask you to consider.

No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

Per page, not per report and not per seat. Ten cents a page on Self-Service with duplicates free, which matters when a mitigation file runs to fifteen thousand pages.

Send one referral file. Read the records section it drafts.

Bring a file you are already evaluating. You get the timeline and the cited records section back, and you judge whether it read what you would have read.

Test a file