NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
HomeDeliverablesImpairment rating worksheet
impairment rating software for QME physicians and rating specialists

The findings a rating is calculated from, pulled out and cited.

Impairment rating software for QME physicians and rating specialists: Medrecords AI pulls the measured findings a rating is calculated from, range of motion, strength, diagnoses, the MMI date and the apportionment evidence, each cited to its page. The rating itself is yours to calculate and sign.

Findings, not a rating·Every measurement opens its page·Your worksheet format

What you walk out with

The measurements and dates in one worksheet instead of scattered across four hundred pages of physical therapy notes.

The measured findings

Range of motion, strength, sensory and gait findings extracted with the date and the examiner who recorded each one.

The MMI evidence

Every entry bearing on maximum medical improvement, in date order, including the ones that conflict with each other.

The apportionment record

Prior injuries, prior ratings and pre-existing findings carried as their own cited rows rather than folded into a narrative.

Your worksheet

The findings laid out in the format you rate from, exported with each value linked to the page it was measured on.

Who this is for

Your judgment, multiplied

A rating is contested on its inputs. Which measurement, taken on which date, by whom, and whether a prior one was apportioned. Those are buried in physical therapy notes nobody wants to read twice.

What comes off your desk is the extraction. What stays yours is the rating: the edition of the Guides your jurisdiction adopted, the table you apply, the apportionment call and the signature. Evaluators use this to rate from the whole record instead of the last four visits.

How the draft gets built

Three steps, each one a capability you can open and read on its own.

Step 1

Read every page

Therapy notes, exam findings, imaging reports and prior ratings, handwriting included, duplicates stripped and never billed to you.

Deduplication →
Step 2

Extract the measurements

Range of motion, strength and functional findings pulled out with their dates and their examiners.

Range of motion analysis →
Step 3

Assemble the worksheet

MMI evidence, apportionment record and measured findings in your rating format, every value linked to its page.

Apportionment graph →

You sign it. That is the point.

The worksheet reports measured findings and dates, cited. It does not calculate an impairment rating, select a table or chapter of the Guides, apportion causation or determine MMI. Those are clinical judgments under the edition your jurisdiction adopted, and they stay with the physician who signs.

Impairment rating worksheet: common questions

No. Applying the adopted edition of the AMA Guides is a clinical judgment under your licence. It gives you the measured findings and the dates, cited, so you are rating from the whole record rather than the pages you had time to read.

No. It surfaces every entry bearing on maximum medical improvement in date order, including the ones that conflict. Which one controls is your call.

No. It carries prior injuries, prior ratings and pre-existing findings as their own cited rows. The apportionment decision is yours and, ultimately, the judge’s.

No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

Per page, not per rating and not per seat. Ten cents a page on Self-Service with duplicates free. The plans page lists every plan in numbers.

Send one rating file. Read the worksheet it assembles.

Bring a file you are already rating. You get the measurements, the MMI evidence and the apportionment record back, cited, and you check them against your own read.

Test a file