HomeProductSettlement Demand Letter
SETTLEMENT DEMAND LETTER SOFTWARE

The demand letter, drafted from the record — not from scratch.

Settlement demand letter software pulls diagnoses, treatment, billing, and future-care costs straight from the structured file into a cited, jurisdiction-ready demand draft. The AI drafts; the attorney decides — the output is a starting point the attorney reviews, revises, and sends, never a finished filing.

AI drafts; the attorney decides. The draft is real, cited work product — a starting point the attorney reviews, revises, and sends. Never a finished filing.

Demand draft · Adams, Timothy Case #IME-4812 DRAFT · attorney review
I. Liability & incident drafted
II. Injuries & diagnoses cited · p.129
III. Treatment · 7 visits, improving since 4/02 cited · p.412
IV. Specials · ICD/CPT-coded from billing pages
V. Future care · low–high range review range
Exhibits pulled automatically from the cited pages — indexed and cross-referenced.
In action · Case #IME-4812
342 pages of record become a five-section demand draft — every assertion cited to its page before the attorney touches it.

Every section starts in the record.

By the time you ask for a demand, the platform has already read the file: chronology built, diagnoses extracted, billing coded, citations attached. The draft assembles from that structure — injuries, treatment narrative, specials, and future care, each populated from the record with the page references inline.

Treatment narrative from the cited chronology
ICD/CPT-coded specials straight from the billing pages
Draft passage · treatment
Following the incident, Mr. Adams underwent a course of physical therapy — 7 documented visits, with objective improvement noted since 4/02 p.412. His treating orthopedist recommended continued follow-up p.418, and imaging confirmed the diagnosis p.129.
Click any citation — the source page opens beside the draft.
Exhibit set · auto-assembled cross-referenced
Exhibit A · Imaging report cited §II · p.129
Exhibit B · PT progress note cited §III · p.412
Exhibit C · Billing statements cited §IV
Your template, your letterhead — DOCX or PDF out.

Exhibits attach themselves.

The pages the draft cites — key notes, imaging reports, billing statements — are pulled into an indexed exhibit set with the cross-references already in place. The demand ships as a package: letter, exhibits, and specials table, formatted to your jurisdiction and your letterhead.

Exhibit index generated from the draft's own citations
Jurisdiction-ready structure — your template and section order

Built for attorney review, not around it.

The draft opens in an editor made for the red pen: tracked changes, inline citations that open the source page beside the text, and flags on anything the record supports weakly. The attorney strengthens the theory, adjusts the ask, and owns the final document — with the verification one click deep the whole way.

Tracked changes and comments for the review pass
Weakly-supported assertions flagged for attorney judgment
Review queue · before send 2 flags open
FLAG Future-care range rests on one recommendation — confirm or trim
FLAG Prior-injury history in the record — address or distinguish
READY All other assertions verified against their linked sources
Nothing sends until the attorney says send.
The adjuster's first move: check the numbers
Specials figure · provider roll-up billing pages cited Treatment claim · 7 visits p.412 Diagnosis · imaging-confirmed p.129
A demand that shows its sources is harder to discount and faster to pay.
The standard

A demand the other side can check — and can't dismiss.

Adjusters discount demands with round numbers and vague narratives. This one cites its record page for every diagnosis, every visit, and every dollar, which makes it audit-grade on their desk and legally defensible on yours. Source-linked persuasion, not adjectives.

See Verifiable AI Citations

From record to demand package.

Three steps — the blank page never appears.

01
Upload the file

Records and bills are read, structured, and cited — the same foundation every other output uses.

02
The draft assembles

Injuries, treatment, specials, and future care populate your template, citations and exhibits attached.

03
The attorney finishes it

Review the flags, sharpen the theory, set the number, and send — DOCX or PDF, on your letterhead.

Who drafts demands with it.

Plaintiff-side teams for whom demand volume is the practice's throughput.

FAQ

Demand letter drafting, answered.

The platform has already read the whole file — chronology built, billing extracted, citations attached. The demand draft assembles from that structure: injuries and diagnoses, treatment narrative, specials, and future care, each section populated from the record with its page citations inline. You start from a cited draft, not a blank page.

From the ICD- and CPT-coded lines extracted from the billing pages and EOBs in the file, rolled into a specials table grouped by provider or category. Every figure is click-to-source, so the number in the demand is the number on the page.

Yes. The pages cited in the draft — key notes, imaging reports, billing pages — are pulled into an exhibit set with the citations cross-referenced, so the demand ships with its evidence attached and indexed.

The draft assembles in the structure and format your jurisdiction and recipient expect — your template, your letterhead, your section order — exported as DOCX for final edits or PDF for service. It does not mean legal advice; the legal strategy stays with the attorney.

The attorney, always. The AI produces real, cited work product — but it is a starting point, never a finished filing. The attorney reviews every assertion against the linked sources, revises, and decides what is sent. AI drafts; humans decide.

Related capabilities

See a demand drafted from one of your files.

Upload a single file and get a cited draft back — sections populated, exhibits indexed, ready for your review pass. Handled under our BAA; never used to train a model.