NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →
Home›Solutions›VA-Accredited Representatives

We draft 90% of the medical chronology for VA-accredited representatives.

Drafted into your appeal brief. You verify and file.

A C-file that arrives as one unsorted scan becomes a dated, cited chronology: service treatment records, VA treatment records, and private charts in a single timeline, with the in-service event and the current diagnosis traceable to a page.

2,000 pages in 20 minutesHIPAASOC 2
Appeal brief foundationfor VA-accredited representatives
review-ready
1,540 pp → STRs, VA and private records, sorted & deduplicated
Service-to-present timeline — cited across treatment history
Findings the rating criteria turn on — cited to source
Prior rating decisions and effective dates — in sequence
C-file
1,540 pp, sorted
Timeline
service to present
Argument
yours to write
Built for the caseload, not just the file.
The status quo
A C-file arrives as one PDF, thousands of pages, out of order
Service treatment records, VA care, and private charts in one undifferentiated scan
Decades of records, one nexus argument to build from them

Open a C-file that's already organized.

Everything the claim needs — structured, surfaced, and sourced. Medrecords organizes decades of records, builds the chronology, and drafts the history with citations, so your time goes to the argument, not the sorting.

Appeal brief · from your templateYour template
p.31 p.212 p.640

Custom reports: your letterhead, your voice

Templates draft the medical history and the record review with inline citations. You build the argument. Export clean, in your format, every time.

Chronology · by date
2011In-service event · lumbar strain, 2011
Feb 11Separation exam — STR
May 22MRI — Lumbar imaging placed inline
Jun 01Gap in care · 47 days
Jul 17Orthopedic consultation

Automated chronology: the history in order

Service treatment records, VA care, private treatment, and gaps — every event dated, sourced, and in sequence. The whole C-file scannable before you file.

Duplicate sets · 4Match similarity
Ambulance Call ReportmultipleReview
Consultation Report84%Review
Progress Note87%Review
Remove all duplicates

Dedup & indexing: shrink the file first

C-files arrive bloated with duplicate scans and misfiled pages. Medrecords removes the redundancy and indexes what remains — so you read each page once.

Cross-checked · multi-modelC-file #M-2210
Veteran nameJane Doe✓
In-service event2011-06-14✓
DiagnosisLumbar disc herniation✓
Separation exam2013-04-02✓
Treatment to datePT ×12 · ESI ×2✓

Built to be verified — not just believed

Multiple models cross-check every extraction. Each field carries its citation and a confidence score, and low-confidence pulls are flagged, so your verification is a click, not a re-read.

Adapts to each claim

Built for expert-level decisions.

Contradictions, diagnostic inconsistencies, prior injuries: surfaced with citations, scored for confidence, and left for you to weigh. The judgment stays yours.

See the full IME workflow, capability by capability →
Intake · Case 2025-0412 reading — p. 1,462 / 1,847
PDF ED_records · 214 pp DOC ortho_chart · 1,128 pp JPG nurse_note · flagged
Multi-model read · dedupe · claimant split · index
1,847 pp in 612 unique 14 flagged One DICOM study
Organized recordby provider · date
01Jul 17Medical Records
02Jul 17Imaging Reports
03Aug 06Physician Notes
612 pp indexed · every row citedopen the case →

Surface the clinical details that change opinions

Contradictions across providers, diagnostic inconsistencies, and key clinical events — highlighted on the timeline and cited to the page, so you analyze instead of search.

You make the calls — always

AI does the reading, every line stays reviewable and traceable, and verification is one click to the source. The findings and the opinion remain yours. As they should.

Who this is for

You're the expert. Reading shouldn't be the job.

Accredited attorneys, claims agents, and VSO representatives preparing C-files for a supplemental claim, higher-level review, or Board appeal.

Contradictions and diagnostic inconsistencies highlighted with sources
Records oriented by provider, facility, and date at a glance
More files per week, with the same clinical rigor
Records review · file 3 of 9 today panel-ready
Dx: cervical radiculopathy — progress notep.212
EMG negative — 6 weeks laterconflict · p.388
Prior rating decision, same body part — 2021p.63
ROM measurements — all visits, comparedtable
Contradictions found for you — conclusions stay yours
The objection

“Will this tell me the right rating?”

It surfaces and cites the clinical findings the rating criteria turn on: range of motion, frequency, severity, and the documented course of treatment. Matching them to a diagnostic code and arguing the evaluation stays yours.

Built for the defensible disability case.

Who we serve

One platform. Built for everyone who works the file.

The same defensible, cited record, shaped to how each team reads it: the case, the claim, or the exam.

Roles
Plaintiff AttorneysProve the injury, dollar by dollar Defense CounselSurface the case-deciding fact Legal Nurse ConsultantsChronologies in a fraction of the time IME & QME PhysiciansDefensible IME opinions, faster Medical Expert WitnessesCited opinions, not paper chases Claims Adjusters & ExaminersTriage and settle sooner Forensic EvaluatorsYour report format, fully cited Medical Examiners & CoronersThe history before the certification Life Care Planners & Vocational ExpertsCost projections built on the full record VA-Accredited RepresentativesYOU ARE HEREThe whole C-file before you file C&P ExaminersC-files, exam-ready on time Social Security Disability RepresentativesYears of records, one hearing
Organizations
Insurance CarriersScale review across every claim Law FirmsLitigation-ready case files TPAs & Case ManagementStandardize across clients Government & Public SectorCompliant, auditable records IME Companies & NetworksOne pipeline, every physician Self-InsurersClaims reviewed like a carrier would Disability InsurersLTD/STD files, cited every cycle Settlement AdministratorsTier claims at MDL scale VA C&P Exam ContractorsC-files, exam-ready on time Hospital Risk ManagementKnow the chart before counsel does Litigation FundersUnderwrite the file, not the pitch Medical Funders & Lien NetworksFund the treatment, verify the file
Use Cases
Social Security DisabilityTimeline ready before the hearing Personal Injury PlaintiffCited evidence on demand Personal Injury DefenseVerify specials, flag the gaps Veteran DisabilityTimeline built before the exam Workers' CompensationTrack treatment and gaps Mass TortQualify claimants at scale Medical MalpracticeReconstruct the timeline Auto Bodily Injury ClaimsSpecials and causation, cited
Not sure which fits? Talk to us about Enterprise
FAQ

VA-accredited representatives, answered.

Yes. Every source merges into one dated, cited timeline, and each entry keeps the page it came from.

The cited chronology and summary are built to drop directly into the argument, with a page reference behind every fact.

Ask about caseload pricing for accredited-representative volume.

CONTENT HUB

The Content Hub covers medical-legal record review across IME and QME, workers’ compensation, personal injury, disability and life underwriting, mass tort, and payer integrity. Free, no login.

Browse the Content Hub

Send your next C-file.

Read the cited timeline. Then write the argument.