The date of injury, suggested — with the page it came from.
Key Date Auto-Suggestion surfaces the likely date of injury (or another key case date) along with the citations behind the suggestion, so review means confirming a candidate instead of paging through the file to find it — and every suggestion stays editable until a reviewer confirms it.
By Ahmed Jemaa, Co-Founder & CEO of Medrecords AI · Published 25 Aug 2026 · Updated 30 Aug 2026
A candidate date, not a hunt through the file.
Key Date Auto-Suggestion scans the record for the likely date of injury, or another key case date, and surfaces the strongest candidate — with the citations behind it — instead of leaving a reviewer to search the packet page by page.
A starting point, not a determination.
Every suggestion ships with its supporting citations and stays editable — a reviewer checks the cited pages, then confirms, corrects, or replaces the candidate. Only a confirmed date carries forward as the case's key date.
Confirm instead of hunt.
Finding the date of injury manually means Ctrl+F and scrolling through hundreds of pages hoping the right note turns up. Key Date Auto-Suggestion turns that search into a check: the candidate and its citations are already there.
See Smart Case IntakeFrom upload to a confirmed date.
4 steps, no page-by-page search — whether it's the date of injury or another key case date.
Records go in the same way they always do — no separate date-hunt step.
References to the injury or event are located across the whole file.
The strongest candidate surfaces with the pages it's drawn from.
Check the cited pages, confirm or correct, and the date anchors the case.
Watch the injury date come with its citations
It opens on the Document Index of the demo case Rivera v. Coastline Freight. A click on the MRI cervical spine record from Harbor Point Imaging opens its popup: a descriptive summary first, then cards for the providers named (the author is marked), the treatment rendered, the diagnostic codes as written and the body parts affected. Next, "Providers in this case" lists 5 people found in 41 mentions. Laura Brennan, MD opens to 3 spellings and the reason each was merged, such as "initial matches one person". The confirmation panel then suggests body parts with record counts, and a date of injury of 03/14/2025 stated in 5 records with quoted citations, next to a 1-record outlier you can flag. Last, a steer instruction adds the MRI impression to the narrative, and the change waits in a word diff for review. Every name, provider and date in the demo is invented.
Transcript
- Open a record for its summary, providers, codes and body parts.
- See each provider once, with every spelling and mention count.
- Confirm the injury date and body parts the records state.
- Steer the narrative, then review the changes before you accept.
Who confirms instead of hunts.
The date of injury decides different things for different teams — everyone still starts from the same cited candidate.
The date of loss anchors the demand — confirmed, not guessed.
For PI firmsDate of injury drives compensability — a citation-backed candidate speeds that check.
For workers compEvaluators walk in with the injury date already checked against the record.
For IME orgsSpend the review hour on the analysis, not the search for a date.
For LNCsRelated features.
Key Date Auto-Suggestion, answered.
A feature that surfaces the likely date of injury, or another key case date, along with the citations behind the suggestion — so instead of paging through the file to find it, review means confirming a candidate.
It scans the uploaded record for the earliest and most consistent references to the injury or event, then surfaces the strongest candidate with the specific pages it draws on, so the reasoning is visible alongside the suggestion.
No. Every suggestion is a starting point, not a determination — it ships with its supporting citations and stays editable until a reviewer confirms it.
The suggestion reflects the strongest candidate found, with its citations attached, so a reviewer can check it against the competing references directly instead of re-deriving the timeline from scratch.
No. It replaces hunting for the date, not deciding on it. The AI drafts a cited candidate; a person still confirms it before it's treated as the case's key date.
Smart Case Intake pre-fills the date of injury field on upload; Key Date Auto-Suggestion is the citation-backed reasoning behind that suggestion, so a reviewer can check the source pages before confirming the field.
If the record doesn't support a confident suggestion, none is forced — the field stays open for manual entry rather than presenting a guess as a citation-backed candidate.
See the cited candidate on your own file.
Book a quick demo, or upload a single file and see the date it suggests, with the pages behind it. No commitment. Handled under our BAA; never used to train a model.