What is in this list
Six kinds of organisation sit in the same market and are easy to confuse. Funders advance cash against a claim. Lien networks sign providers up to treat on a letter of protection and get paid at settlement. Provider networks are the directories those networks publish. Billing companies handle the lien paperwork. Associations set the rules the rest work under. Comparison sites rank them. The entity type on each row says which one you are looking at.
One member directory was left out because it sits behind a login. Its published advisory material and its 18-state statute map were recorded instead; the member roster was not.
Why record review reaches this market
A lien is only as good as the treatment record behind it. Whoever advances the money has to know what was treated, when, by whom, and whether the billed care lines up with the injury. The same question comes back at settlement, when the lien gets negotiated against what the chart actually shows.
Medrecords AI turns the file into a dated, cited chronology in minutes rather than days, with every entry linked to its page in the source record. The person holding the lien still decides what it is worth.
Key facts
| Listings | 217 |
| Carrying a public link | 120 |
| States and territories | 18 |
| Contact details shown | None |
| Last verified | 2026-09-15 |
| Gated source | One provider directory behind an email capture form produced no rows |
| Regulatory note | New York's DFS litigation-funding registry is not live yet, so no roster exists to list |
How this list was built
Names were collected from public listings, normalised and merged to one row per listee. The rows carry name, credential, specialty and location, and the listee’s own site where they publish one. No phone number and no email address is published here.
Listed here and want a correction or a removal? Tell us and it is done.
