Guides › HIPAA and AI record review
HIPAA and AI medical record review: what to verify
HIPAA compliant AI medical record review means the vendor signs a business associate agreement, encrypts PHI in transit and at rest, limits who can access it, and does not reuse your files. Before you send any tool protected health information, confirm those points and where your data physically lives.
Sending medical records to an AI tool means sending protected health information to a vendor. HIPAA has clear expectations for that, and most of the risk is avoidable by asking the right questions before you sign. This is the checklist to run any AI record-review vendor through, and the answers a compliant one should give.
What HIPAA expects of an AI vendor
A vendor that processes PHI on your behalf is a business associate. That carries specific obligations, and a compliant vendor meets them without hedging.
- ›A signed business associate agreement, or BAA, before any PHI is uploaded. No BAA, no PHI.
- ›Encryption in transit and at rest, typically TLS 1.2 or higher and AES-256.
- ›Access controls and audit logging, so use of PHI is limited and traceable.
- ›A clear breach-notification commitment in the agreement.
- ›Data minimization: the vendor takes only what it needs to do the job.
The questions that separate compliant from convenient
- ›Where does our data physically live, and can it stay in our jurisdiction or on our own infrastructure?
- ›Do you reuse our files to train models or for anything beyond producing our output?
- ›Who can access PHI on your side, and is that access logged?
- ›Can we get an on-premise or private deployment for sensitive matters?
- ›What happens to our data when we stop using the service?
A tool can be encrypted and still use your files to train its models or enrich a dataset. Ask directly whether your records are reused for anything beyond your own output, and get the answer in writing. For medical-legal work, files that leave for someone else’s benefit are a problem the encryption does not solve.
Cloud, on-premise, and sovereign deployment
Where the data lives is often the deciding factor. A shared cloud is fine for many teams with the right agreements. For sensitive matters, client contracts, or data-residency rules, an on-premise or sovereign deployment that runs on your own infrastructure removes an entire category of vendor risk, because the PHI never leaves your control.
HIPAA-aligned handling with a BAA and DPA available, AES-256 encryption and TLS 1.2 or higher, SOC 2 audit-ready controls, and an on-premise deployment that runs on your own infrastructure. Your files are used to produce your outputs and are not reused or de-identified for anyone else. The full posture is on the security page, stated plainly.
Upload a record and get a cited chronology back in minutes. You bring the file; a qualified reviewer stays the decision-maker.
Test a file →Frequently asked
Is AI medical record review HIPAA compliant?
It can be, when the vendor signs a business associate agreement, encrypts PHI in transit and at rest, limits and logs access, and does not reuse your files. Compliance is a property of the vendor and the agreement, not of AI itself. Confirm those points and where your data lives before uploading any PHI.
Do I need a BAA with an AI medical records vendor?
Yes. Any vendor that processes protected health information on your behalf is a business associate under HIPAA and should sign a business associate agreement before you upload anything. If a tool will not provide a BAA, it should not receive PHI, regardless of how good the product looks.
Does AI use my medical records to train its models?
Some tools might, which is exactly why you should ask in writing. A compliant vendor uses your files only to produce your output and does not reuse or de-identify them for training or resale. Get the reuse policy in the agreement rather than relying on a verbal assurance.
Can AI medical record review run on-premise for compliance?
Yes. For sensitive matters or data-residency requirements, an on-premise or sovereign deployment runs the software on infrastructure you control, so PHI never leaves your environment. That removes a category of vendor risk and is worth asking about before you default to a shared cloud.