342 pages. One count tells you where the case actually lives.
Body Part Occurrence Detection groups and counts every body-part and injury reference across the file, surfacing which anatomy the record actually centers on — not just what the referral letter says the case is about — with every occurrence linked back to the page that mentions it.
Every mention, grouped under one anatomy.
Body Part Occurrence Detection scans every page for body-part and injury references and rolls variant phrasing for the same anatomy or spinal level into a single group, so a mention count reflects the whole file — not however a term happened to be phrased on any one page.
The count that tells you where the case actually lives.
Once every reference is grouped, the occurrence count becomes a map of where the file's attention sits — often different from what the referral letter or intake form named as the focus. Every count is drillable back to the page that mentions it.
A focus map, not a keyword search.
Searching a record for "knee" returns pages. Body Part Occurrence Detection returns a count, grouped and ranked, of every anatomy the file actually discusses — so a reviewer sees the real center of a case in one glance instead of reading 342 pages to find it.
See Medical Record Q&AFrom 342 pages to one ranked count.
4 steps, no manual tally — whether you're prepping an exam, working a claim, or building a case.
Notes, imaging reports, operative reports, and billing are all checked for body-part and injury references.
Variant terms for the same body part fold into one group instead of splitting the count.
Groups sort by mention count, most-referenced anatomy first.
Click any count to open its citing pages and confirm the pattern yourself.
Who needs the real focus surfaced fast.
Same count, different use: each team reads the pattern for what decides their file.
Walk into the exam already knowing which anatomy the file actually centers on.
For evaluatorsSpot a mismatch between the referral's stated focus and what the file discusses.
For LNCsConfirm the claimed body part is what the treatment record actually reflects.
For workers compCheck a claimed injury pattern against every page, not just the demand letter.
For defense teamsBody part occurrence detection, answered.
Every explicit reference to a body part or injury across the file — in notes, imaging reports, operative reports, and billing — grouped by anatomy and totaled into one count per body part.
No. An occurrence count describes how often something is mentioned, not a diagnosis or a causation finding — it's a pattern to review, and every count is drillable back to the citing page.
Yes. Every occurrence in a group opens to the specific page that mentions it, so a reviewer can check the pattern against the source instead of taking the tally on faith.
A referral letter states an intended focus at the time it was written. Occurrence counts reflect what the file itself discusses across every page since, which can surface a different, or additional, area of concern as treatment progressed.
Yes. Variant terms for the same anatomy or spinal level fold into a single group, so the count reflects the whole file instead of being split across however a term happened to be phrased on any one page.
No. Occurrence counts surface a pattern for a human reviewer to confirm — they don't diagnose, apportion causation, or make a case-merit judgment. That stays with the reviewer.
Related features
See every occurrence in date order, on the same timeline the count is built from.
ExploreAsk a follow-up question about any body part and get a cited answer.
ExplorePair the focus area with the date it likely started, cited to source.
ExploreSee where your case actually lives.
Upload a file and get a ranked body-part occurrence count back, every group linked to its source pages. No commitment. Handled under our BAA; never used to train a model.