HomeSolutionsMedical Board Investigation Review
MEDICAL BOARD INVESTIGATION RECORD REVIEW

40 charts, 1 prescribing pattern, every page cited.

Medical board investigation record review services organize the multi-patient chart sets behind a licensure complaint. Prescribing histories, visit documentation, and standard-of-care questions are abstracted chart by chart and page-cited, so a board investigator or defense counsel can see the pattern across patients instead of reading each file cold.

Click any row → the source page it cites
Chart abstraction · Case #IME-4812 documented
Adams, Timothy · licensure investigation file
342 pp / 2 packets received logged
11 duplicate pages removed free
p.140 — wrong patient quarantined
Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100%

The practice act is published. So is the board that applies it.

We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In medical board investigations, both are already published.

The standard and the referee
The rulebook
  • The state medical practice act and the board's own regulations, which define unprofessional conduct and the documentation a licensee must keep
  • State controlled-substance prescribing rules and PDMP check requirements, which set what the chart must show before and during opioid therapy
  • The board's disciplinary guidelines, which tie a finding to a sanction range
  • The standard of care as testified to by the board's expert reviewer, chart by chart
The referee
  • The board's investigator and its expert reviewer, who read the charts and write the report the board votes on
  • The board itself, in a public disciplinary order that is citable and appealable
  • The state administrative law court on appeal, where a sanction unsupported by the record can be reversed
An expert reviewer reading 40 charts at hourly rates, before anyone has organized them Flat 10¢/page here, duplicates free
Chart abstraction · Case #IME-4812 cited 100%
Packet342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicatedlogged
Patient chartsAbstracted to a common structurecited
Prescribing historyDrug, dose, date, prescriber per visitcited
Documentation gapsVisits missing a required elementflagged
Abstraction delivered · cited 100% · no standard-of-care opinion
How it works

3 steps between the charts and the review.

01

Send the chart set

Every patient chart under review, as produced — EHR exports, faxed notes, PDMP printouts, handwritten records, in any format.

02

We return the abstraction, page-cited

Each chart reduced to the same structure: visits, complaints, examinations, prescriptions, and monitoring, with every entry citing its page.

03

Your expert forms the opinion

The board's reviewer or the licensee's expert reads the pattern and states whether the standard of care was met. That opinion is theirs.

The boundary, in writing

An abstraction of the charts, not an opinion on the licensee.

We organize and cite what each chart documents, and we flag where a required element is absent from a visit note. We do not opine on the standard of care, characterize conduct as unprofessional, or recommend a sanction. Those determinations belong to the board's expert reviewer and to the board.

In the demo case, page 140 turned out to belong to a different patient. The abstraction flags it and quarantines it in its own line — which matters more, not less, when a single investigation spans dozens of charts.

Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable
08:12Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packetssystem
08:3111 pages deduplicatedsystem
08:44p.140 flagged — wrong patientsystem
08:54Chart abstraction complete · abstraction complete · 40 charts · cited 100%system
09:20Chart abstraction reviewed · citations verifiedreviewer
09:26Chart abstraction exported · investigative exhibit drafted off-platformreviewer
Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery
Why Medrecords AI

The rules the platform never breaks.

Medrecords AI EVERY LINE CITED
CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T.342 pp
2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4
4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61
p.140 — wrong patient quarantined
Medrecords AI
Read every page · cite every line

HIPAA, under a signed BAA

Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.

Never trains a model

Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.

Every line cited

If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.

Deleted after delivery

Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.

Powered by the platform

4 capabilities behind every chart abstraction.

The chart abstraction is 1 deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.

Medical Records OCR

Every chart read in full — EHR exports, faxed consults, handwritten progress notes, PDMP printouts — nothing skipped, nothing guessed.

IN ACTION · 342 pp / 2 packets → 27 documents, read in full

Medical Chronology

Each patient's course builds itself into a timeline, so a prescribing pattern is visible across visits instead of buried in them.

IN ACTION · first prescription → current regimen, 1 continuous timeline

Verifiable AI Citations

If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every abstracted entry links to the chart page and the visit it came from.

IN ACTION · every chart entry → cited 100%

Medical Summary Reports

The abstraction formats straight into the investigative file — your template, your letterhead.

IN ACTION · chart abstraction → board-ready exhibit
FAQ

Medical board investigation review, answered.

No. We abstract and cite what each chart documents and flag visits missing a required element. Whether the documented conduct falls below the standard of care is an expert opinion, given by the board's reviewer or the licensee's expert, and ultimately decided by the board.

Yes. The deliverable is the same either way: a page-cited abstraction of what the charts contain. Both sides work from the record, and an abstraction that cites every entry is checkable by whoever reads it next.

Each chart is read and abstracted separately to the same structure, then presented side by side. Documents are matched to the patient they belong to, and anything that doesn't match is quarantined rather than filed into the wrong chart.

No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

Send 1 file. We'll tell you what we can read.

No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.