NewWe now read the actual MRI and CT imaging — not just the radiologist's 1-page report. See how →
HomeSolutionsOhio Affidavit of Merit
OHIO CERTIFICATE OF MERIT RECORD REVIEW

An affidavit for each defendant, or a motion for 90 more days.

Ohio certificate of merit record review services prepare the page-cited record an expert reads before signing the affidavit Civ.R. 10(D)(2) requires. Every encounter and finding is indexed to its source page, and the review is organised by defendant, because the rule requires an affidavit relative to each one.

Click any row → the source page it cites
Record review · Case #IME-4812 documented
Adams, Timothy · pre-filing record set
342 pp / 2 packets received logged
11 duplicate pages removed free
p.140 — wrong patient quarantined
Pages 342 Documents 27 Cited 100%

Rule 10(D)(2) attaches the affidavit to the pleading itself.

We do not build for a case type until we can name the standard that defines a correct output and the person who grades the file against it. In merit screening, both are written into the rule itself.

The standard and the referee
The rulebook
  • Ohio Civ.R. 10(D)(2)(a), which requires one or more affidavits of merit relative to each defendant for whom expert testimony is necessary to establish liability
  • Ohio Civ.R. 10(D)(2)(a), under which the affidavit states familiarity with the applicable standard of care, that the affiant has reviewed the applicable medical records, and the opinion that the standard was breached
  • Ohio Civ.R. 10(D)(2)(b), the motion for an extension of up to ninety days to file the affidavit
  • Ohio Evid.R. 601(D) and 702, which require an expert giving liability testimony in a medical claim to devote at least half their professional time to active clinical practice
The referee
  • The trial court on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the express consequence of an inadequate affidavit
  • The Ohio appellate courts, which have examined how specifically the affidavit has to identify the breaching defendant
  • The affiant, who has to attest that they have reviewed the applicable medical records — the rule says so in terms
Expert hours multiplied by every defendant for whom testimony is necessary Flat 10¢/page here, duplicates free
Record review · Case #IME-4812 cited 100%
Packet342 pp / 2 packets · 11 deduplicatedlogged
Chronology by defendantEncounters mapped to each providercited
Findings and imagingEach result at its source pagecited
Records referenced, not producedNamed in the chart, absent from the fileflagged
Review delivered · cited 100% · no standard-of-care opinion offered
How it works

3 steps between the records and the affidavit.

01

Send the record set

Hospital charts, office notes, imaging and operative reports, nursing records and billing, in any format.

02

We return the review, page-cited and split by defendant

The chronology, findings and course of treatment, each line citing the page it came from, organised so each named defendant's involvement reads on its own.

03

Your expert signs the affidavits

Familiarity with the standard of care and the opinion that it was breached are the affiant's, one affidavit relative to each defendant, and filing is counsel's.

The boundary, in writing

A record review, never an affidavit of merit.

We index and cite what the record documents. We do not state the applicable standard of care, opine that it was breached, identify which defendant breached it, or sign an affidavit under Civ.R. 10(D)(2). Those are the affiant's statements, from an expert qualified under Evid.R. 601(D) and 702.

The rule requires the affiant to attest that they have reviewed the applicable medical records. That attestation is the whole reason a page-cited review exists: it is the difference between having read the file and having received it.

Audit trail · Case #IME-4812 exportable
08:12Packet received · 342 pp / 2 packetssystem
08:3111 pages deduplicatedsystem
08:44p.140 flagged — wrong patientsystem
08:54Record review complete · review complete · chronology cited · cited 100%system
09:20Record review reviewed · citations verifiedreviewer
09:26Record review exported · affidavits signed and filed off-platformreviewer
Every access logged · file deleted 30 days after delivery
Why Medrecords AI

The rules the platform never breaks.

Medrecords AI EVERY LINE CITED
CASE #IME-4812 · ADAMS, T.342 pp
2/14 — ER visit, right knee p.4
4/18 — arthroscopic surgery p.61
p.140 — wrong patient quarantined
Medrecords AI
Read every page · cite every line

HIPAA, under a signed BAA

Every file is handled under our Business Associate Agreement, from the first byte.

Never trains a model

Your records are never used to train any AI model — ours or anyone else's.

Every line cited

If we can't cite it, we don't say it. Every sentence links to its source page.

Deleted after delivery

Files are deleted 30 days after delivery, with a full audit log of every access.

Powered by the platform

4 capabilities behind every record review.

The record review is one deliverable of the same platform that reads, sorts, and cites the whole record.

FAQ

Ohio affidavits of merit, answered.

No. Civ.R. 10(D)(2) requires an affidavit from an expert qualified under Evid.R. 601(D) and 702, attesting to familiarity with the standard of care, review of the applicable medical records, and the opinion that the standard was breached. We prepare the record review behind that attestation.

Because the rule requires one or more affidavits relative to each defendant for whom expert testimony is necessary to establish liability, and Ohio courts have looked closely at how specifically the affidavit identifies who breached the standard.

Civ.R. 10(D)(2)(b) allows a motion for an extension of up to ninety days to file it. Filing neither the affidavit nor the motion leaves the complaint subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim.

No. Medrecords AI does not retrieve records from providers or facilities. You bring the records you already have — review starts in minutes from upload. Retrieval vendors take days; you can keep yours and still cut the review to minutes.

Evid.R. 601(D) and 702 govern, and include the requirement that a person giving expert testimony on liability in a medical claim devote at least half of their professional time to active clinical practice. Qualification is a legal question for counsel.

Send one file. We'll tell you what we can read.

No obligation. If the case type is buildable we'll scope it; if it isn't, we'll say so.