NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →

InQuery — Profile & Assessment

InQuery publishes 5 of the 8 buying facts this rubric checks, including turnaround but not pricing. InQuery operates in the medical-record review ecosystem, within the Insurance / Legal / TPA segment. This profile records what the company publishes about its services, maps those claims to the Content Hub evaluation rubric, and cites every source behind them. 12 of 17 facts are confirmed from 18 public sources; unpublished fields are marked, never estimated.

4 sections·18 sources·Verified 2026-08-28 ✓
Disclosure
11/17 facts
01

What it does

InQuery does not publish a description of its services. The fields below record only what could be confirmed from the 17 public sources cited at the foot of this page; nothing is estimated to fill the gap.

Key facts

Segment

Insurance / Legal / TPA

Website

inquery.ai

Founded

2023

HQ

New York, NY, USA (447 Broadway FL 2, New York, NY 10013-2562)

Headcount

4 employees

Certifications

SOC 2 Type I; states HIPAA compliance (no third-party audit named)

Ownership

Y Combinator-backed startup

Not publishedPricingTurnaround

Medrecords AI vs InQuery at a glance

Same eight rubric rows, side by side. Vendor cells repeat what InQuery publishes; a row it has not published stays that way. Medrecords AI cells are our own published terms.

Rubric rowMedrecords AIInQuery
Processing modelAI drafts and cites; you review and sign. Every line cites its source page.AI + Human QA
Human QAYours, not ours. Output is editable and every claim links to the page it came from.Included ('People check the work')
Typical turnaroundMinutes to hours per file2-6 hours (standard 300-500 page PI case)
Pricing modelPay per page, no subscription (Self-Service); annual licence for AI Enablement and On-PremNot published
Indicative costfrom 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page, duplicates freeNot published
Export formatsDOCX, PDF and HTML, hyperlinked back to every source page; API or SFTP deliveryNot published
Best forLaw firms, IME clinics, legal nurse consultants and small TPAsHigh-severity, multi-source claims needing rapid fact extraction
Customer satisfactionWe publish no rating of our ownNo public reviews found

Longer versions: Medrecords AI vs InQuery, head to head · InQuery alternatives compared.

The boundary on our side does not move: the software drafts and cites; you review, you revise, you sign.

02

Evaluation criteria

Content Hub rubric5 of 8 published
✓
Processing model
AI + Human QA
✓
Human QA
Included ('People check the work')
✓
Typical turnaround
2-6 hours (standard 300-500 page PI case)
○
Pricing model
No published pricing model. No numbers published.
○
Export formats
No formats named; deliverables described as source-linked and page-cited
✓
Best for
High-severity, multi-source claims needing rapid fact extraction
✓
Customer satisfaction
No public reviews found
○
Not published
Indicative cost goes unstated, as it does across most of this market. The questions to ask instead are below.
03

Profile notes

Who it serves
Case types not published.
Claims & platform notes
No platform claims published.
Review summary
Not independently rated by Medrecords AI. Cited public reviews are listed under Sources; Medrecords AI assigns no star rating without verified evidence.
Competitive coverage
Comparing the Top AI Medical Chronology and Record Retrieval Platforms Side by Side · AI Medical Chronology Speed Benchmarks: Top Platforms Compared · Medical Record Summary Software: Costs, AI Tools, Top Platforms · 7 AI Platforms for Legal Medical Chronologies: Features, Pricing, and Accuracy Compared · Medical Chronology Services vs Software: Costs, Workflow, Top Tools · Best Medical Summary Software for Law Firms Compared in 2026 · How to Evaluate Medical Summarization Platforms: Buyer's Guide (2026) · AI Demand Letter Tools for Personal Injury Lawyers: 2026 Guide · 10 Best AI Tools for Medical Record Review in Litigation · Medical Record Summary Software for Adjusters & Carriers: 2026 Comparison
04

What to confirm before you sign

InQuery publishes 5 of the 8 fields in the Content Hub rubric. Across all 270 vendors profiled in the Content Hub, the median is 5 of 8. Of the three it leaves unpublished, these two matter most.

  1. How do you charge — per page, per file, per hour, or per seat?
    Get the unit before you scope a pilot. A per-hour or per-seat quote and a per-page quote behave very differently once a file runs past 1,000 pages.
    Pricing model56% of all profiled vendors leave this unpublishedOurs: flat per page, no seats, no subscription
  2. What does a real 1,000-page file cost, all in?
    Ask for a worked example rather than a rate card. Duplicate pages, rush fees and monthly minimums are where the quoted rate and the final invoice separate.
    Indicative cost82% of all profiled vendors leave this unpublishedOurs: from 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page, duplicates free

The other seven questions, and what all 270 profiled vendors do and do not publish, are in the evaluation guide.

Sources

How Medrecords AI does this work

InQuery works in medical-record review. Medrecords AI does this category of work as software: the record sorted, deduplicated and read in minutes, every statement cited back to its page, and a qualified human signs off on what it means.

SolutionInsurance carriersClaim files read, cited and organised for the adjuster who has to decide.Read more →SolutionLaw firmsCase files read end to end, with every fact traceable to its page.Read more →ProductMedical chronologyA dated, deduplicated timeline with a citation on every entry.Read more →
Test it on a file you already have.
Send one real record set. You get back a cited chronology and decide for yourself whether the read holds up — no obligation either way.
Test a fileBook a demo

Explore the Content Hub

Software & platforms

AI and case-management platforms across medical-record review.

Service providers & BPOs

Record review, peer review, retrieval, LNC and BPO providers.

State programs

Rules, AMA Guides edition, and MMI standards by state.

Comparisons

Head-to-head vendor and program comparisons.

Guides

Editorial reference on report writing, MMI, and validity testing.

Conferences & events

Workers' comp, claims, insurance and medical-legal conferences with editorial takes.

Directories

Link-out rosters of examiners, LNCs, and expert witnesses.

State matrix report

All 10 verified state programs, side by side.

Content Hub home

The full index of everything in the hub.

Medrecords AIMedrecords AI

Minutes per file. Every line cited. From 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page.

Bring the hardest file from this page. Get a cited chronology and a report draft in minutes — every line traced to its source page, ready for your review and signature.

  • Minutes per file, not days
  • Every line cited to its source page
  • From 10¢ to as low as 5¢/page, duplicates free — no license, no minimums
  • HIPAA-eligible · SOC 2
Test on a file Book a demo

See how Medrecords AI compares with anything on this page — over a 30-minute call, side by side.

Last verified: 2026-08-15