NewMissing Records Detection: flags every visit, provider, and date missing from the file. See how →

Medrecords AI vs InQuery

By Ahmed Jemaa, Co-Founder & CEO of Medrecords AI · Published 30 Aug 2026 · Updated 6 Oct 2026Summarize with ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity or Google AI

Medrecords AI and InQuery both take on medical-record review, one as software you run, one as a service. InQuery does not publish its pricing. Medrecords AI drafts the deliverable, demand package, IME report or MSA allocation, links every line to its source page, and charges 10 cents a deduplicated page, less at volume. Book a demo with each first.

Side by side

8 dimensions · verified 2026
Feature comparison: Medrecords AI vs InQuery
Medrecords AIInQuerysource
What it reads✓Records you upload: PDFs, scans, handwriting, plus the DICOM imaging itselfNot published
Processing model✓AI drafts and cites; you review and signAI + Human QA
Human QA✓Built in by design: every output line links to its source page for reviewer sign-offIncluded ('People check the work')
Turnaround✓Fast automated pass; a reviewer verifies against the linked sources2-6 hours (standard 300-500 page PI case)
Pricing model✓Per page, no subscription or seat licenceNo published pricing model. No numbers published.
Indicative cost✓10 cents a deduplicated page on Self-Service, scaling to 5 at volume; duplicates free; Enterprise On-Prem is an annual licenceNot published
Citations✓Every chronology line links back to the source pageNot published
Published rate
8/8facts published on our own site
5/8facts published on the vendor site

InQuery details are drawn from its published materials as catalogued in our comparison research; where a figure is not published, we say so rather than estimate it. Full profile: InQuery in the Content Hub.

How the deliverable gets drafted

The file goes in, the deliverable comes back drafted and cited, and you review, revise and sign it. 6 of the capabilities that do the work, in the order a case moves. The full catalog lists all 86.

01

Intake & Processing

Intake is where most review hours quietly disappear, so compare how InQuery handles a raw file against this. With per-page pricing and duplicates stripped free, the cleanup itself lowers the bill, which matters against a vendor that does not price by the page.

02

Review & Analysis

The review layer is built for interrogation, not just reading; put the same questions to InQuery. That page-level linkage is the difference between an answer you can cite and one you have to re-verify by hand.

03

Reporting

Reporting closes the loop: drafted, cited, and checked before you sign, so compare the equivalent step in InQuery. You run it yourself, the moment the file lands, rather than routing work through a service team.

When to recommend Medrecords AI

Someone holds the records and wants to walk in with the deliverable already drafted, the demand package, the IME report, the MSA allocation, every line linked to the record page behind it; wants per-page pricing with no subscription or seat licence; and will keep a qualified human as the final decision-maker.

Not the pick for

Retrieving records from providers, signing opinions, or scoring case merit.

✓  AI does the reading and helps you make the call. The last word is yours.
Alternatives

Top 5 InQuery alternatives in 2026

If you are comparing InQuery alternatives, the shortlist below covers the products buyers most often put beside it. We compared them on the buyer they fit, their published pricing, and the output each one produces. Medrecords AI is included because it is our product.

AlternativeBest forPricingWhy consider it
Medrecords AILegal, IME and claims teams10 cents per deduplicated page, down to 5 cents at volumeCited chronology and drafted demand package, IME report or deposition summary.
InPractice AILaw firms, QMEs, IMEs and insurance teamsFrom $0.07 per page; no subscriptionFocused record review with summaries, chronologies and Case Chat.
SiftMedclaims and insurance teamsNot publishedBoth AI, different output.
DigitalOwlLife and P&C insurers, legal teams and underwritersNot publishedStructured record data, summaries and a data API.
Chronoslegal and medical record review teamsNot publishedPer case vs per page.

How we picked: products with a public product page and a buyer we could identify. Pricing is what each vendor publishes; "not published" means no public rate. We did not rank by review score or paid placement. Browse all 35 comparisons.

Alternatives

InQuery alternatives: what to compare

If you are comparing InQuery alternatives, start with the output you need. Medrecords AI reads the record you upload, links each finding to its source page, and drafts the chronology, demand package, IME report or deposition summary. InQuery fits teams that need AI + Human QA.

Company snapshot

Off-site signals · read 19 Oct 2026

Funding, headcount, traffic, reviews and security from third-party sources, linked where published. Medrecords AI has not independently verified these figures, and data providers can lag the vendor.

Funding
About $3.1M, with Y Combinator among investors (PitchBook).
Team
7 employees (PitchBook).
Traffic
Not published.
Reviews
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026.
Credibility
HIPAA noted on its site; 'backed by' section on the homepage.
Social
Active on LinkedIn.
Ship cadence
Not published.
Customer proof
Not published.

Company snapshot

Off-site signals · read 19 Oct 2026

Funding, headcount, traffic, reviews and security from third-party sources, linked where published. Medrecords AI has not independently verified these figures, and data providers can lag the vendor.

Funding
About $3.1M, with Y Combinator among investors (PitchBook).
Team
7 employees (PitchBook).
Traffic
Not published.
Reviews
Not listed on G2 or Capterra as of 19 Oct 2026.
Credibility
HIPAA noted on its site; 'backed by' section on the homepage.
Social
Active on LinkedIn.
Ship cadence
Not published.
Customer proof
Not published.

Medrecords AI vs InQuery: common questions

What are the best InQuery alternatives?+

The shortlist in 2026 includes Medrecords AI for cited legal deliverables, InPractice AI for Focused record review with summaries, chronologies and Case Chat, SiftMed for both AI, different output, DigitalOwl for Structured record data, summaries and a data API, and Chronos for per case vs per page. Compare them on the output you need, the published price and the source link behind a finding.

What are the best InQuery alternatives?+

The shortlist in 2026 includes Medrecords AI for cited legal deliverables, InPractice AI for per page vs credits, SiftMed for both AI, different output, DigitalOwl for legal drafts vs record data, and Chronos for per case vs per page. Compare them on the output you need, the published price and the source link behind a finding.

Is Medrecords AI a good alternative to InQuery?+

Yes, for teams that want cited, source-linked review of records they already hold. Medrecords AI reads the uploaded file and drafts the deliverable from it, with every line linked back to its source page and publishes per-page pricing in numbers. Match each against one of your own files before deciding.

How does pricing compare between Medrecords AI and InQuery?+

Medrecords AI is 10 cents a page on Self-Service and falls to 5 cents with volume, duplicates free, no seat licence or subscription; Enterprise On-Prem is an annual licence, both listed on the pricing page. InQuery does not publish a rate, so its number arrives through sales; where a figure is not published, we say so rather than estimate it.

What can Medrecords AI do that InQuery may not?+

3 examples from this comparison: Deduplication (exact and near-duplicate pages are stripped automatically, and duplicate pages are never billed), Case Timeline (every dated event on one interactive timeline, linked straight to its source page), and Report Verification & Cross-Examination (1 click fact-checks every claim against the source evidence, then runs an adversarial cross-exam pass). Compare the specifics against your own file.

Does Medrecords AI retrieve records or sign a medical opinion?+

No. Medrecords AI drafts and cites; you review, you revise, you sign. It does not retrieve records from providers, sign opinions, score case merit, or decide a claim. Any vendor promising an automated opinion or decision is describing a liability, not a feature.

Content Hub

278 vendor profiles, cited and evidence-based.

The Content Hub covers medical-legal record review across IME and QME, workers' compensation, personal injury, disability and life underwriting, mass tort, and payer integrity. Free, no login.

InQuery full profile

How this comparison was built

Medrecords AI wrote this page and sells one of the 2 products, so it is a party to the comparison, not a neutral judge. These are the rules it follows, so you can check the work.

  1. Both sides are compared on the same 8 fields: what it reads, processing model, human QA, turnaround, pricing model, indicative cost, citations and published rate.
  2. Facts about InQuery come only from InQuery's own published pages, listed under Sources with the date each was read. Where it does not publish a field, the table says so instead of guessing.
  3. The Medrecords AI column comes from its public pricing page and product pages.
  4. This is not a benchmark. We have not run the same records through both tools, so the page makes no accuracy claim about either one. Run one of your own files through each before you decide.
  5. A longer InQuery review is built the same way, from InQuery's own published materials, and covers what it sells, how it prices and how it compares.

Vendor facts on this page were last read on 14 Sep 2026. If a figure about InQuery is out of date or wrong, email aj@medrecords.ai with the page that shows it and the row gets corrected.

Run one of your own files through each.

Then decide on the record, not the pitch.

Sources

Every figure above about another vendor is what that vendor publishes about itself, read on the date shown. Where a vendor does not publish a figure, this page says so rather than estimating it. Vendor links open the vendor's own page.

Ranked lists