What it does
Records Retrieval Solutions publishes these service lines: Document processing (OCR/ML), Request management/workflow tracking, Secure storage and archiving and Analytics and reporting. Everything above is drawn from the 8 public sources cited at the foot of this page. Fields the company does not publish are marked as unpublished below rather than estimated.
Key facts
| Segment | Mass Tort / Settlement / Lien |
| Website | No live site; the company indicates a rebrand to Sunlight Access, new URL not confirmed. |
| Certifications | SOC 2 Type II compliance claimed |
| Founded | 2014 |
| HQ | Orange Park, FL, USA (per its LinkedIn company page; the vendor's own site says only "Based in Florida") |
| Headcount | 11-50 employees (self-reported band on its LinkedIn company page) |
| Not published | OwnershipPricingTurnaround |
Medrecords AI vs Records Retrieval Solutions at a glance
Same 8 rubric rows, side by side. Vendor cells repeat what Records Retrieval Solutions publishes; a row it has not published stays that way. Medrecords AI cells are our own published terms.
| Rubric row | Medrecords AI | Records Retrieval Solutions |
| Processing model | AI drafts and cites; you review and sign. Every line cites its source page. | Not published |
| Human QA | Yours, not ours. Output is editable and every claim links to the page it came from. | None disclosed |
| Typical turnaround | Minutes to hours per file | Not published |
| Pricing model | Pay per page, no subscription (Self-Service); annual licence for Enterprise On-Prem | Not published |
| Indicative cost | from 10¢ to as low as 5¢ a page, duplicates free | Not published |
| Export formats | DOCX, PDF and HTML, hyperlinked back to every source page; API or SFTP delivery | Not published |
| Best for | Law firms, IME clinics, legal nurse consultants and small TPAs | Not published |
| Customer satisfaction | We publish no rating of our own | No public reviews found |
Longer versions: Medrecords AI vs Records Retrieval Solutions, head to head · Records Retrieval Solutions alternatives compared.
The boundary on our side does not move: the software drafts and cites; you review, you revise, you sign.
Evaluation criteria
Profile notes
What to confirm before you sign
Records Retrieval Solutions publishes 4 of the 8 fields in the Content Hub rubric. Across the 23 Mass Tort / Settlement / Lien vendors profiled here, the median is 4 of 8. Of the 4 it leaves unpublished, these 2 matter most.
- How do you charge — per page, per file, per hour, or per seat?Get the unit before you scope a pilot. A per-hour or per-seat quote and a per-page quote behave very differently once a file runs past 1,000 pages.
- What does a real 1,000-page file cost, all in?Ask for a worked example rather than a rate card. Duplicate pages, rush fees and monthly minimums are where the quoted rate and the final invoice separate.
The other 7 questions, and what all 270 profiled vendors do and do not publish, are in the evaluation guide.
Sources
- Records Retrieval Solutions website
- Records Retrieval Solutions (rebrand notice)
- Wisedocs: Top 10 Record Retrieval Companies in North America
- Codes Health: Record Retrieval Solutions Alternatives
- Codes Health: Best Medical Record Retrieval Software Solutions for Case Managers in 2026
- Records On Time: Top Medical Record Retrieval Companies of 2026
- Records Retrieval Solutions, About us
- Records Retrieval Solutions, medical record summarization
- Records Retrieval Solutions: LinkedIn company page (self-reported)
